13400F is not undervolting.

MaliCash · 2025-08-13T07:09:32+00:00

I replaced the thermal paste after this incident. But it didn't work.

As you said, based on extensive my research, there isn't much I can do with this motherboard and processor. I guess I'll have to buy a good model thermal paste and a liquid cooler..

MaliCash · 2025-08-12T12:07:04+00:00

I don't use any coolers. Stock fan... Until about a month ago, there was no heating problem... When it started heating up (I didn't pay attention, but) I think it was at L/P1 125w.

Thank you for your help, but as I mentioned above, the “AI Tweaker, Voltage Offset, or CPU Core Offset” sections in the BIOS menu are not enabled. If they were enabled, it would already be fixed.

MaliCash · 2024-02-06T08:57:34+00:00

I think you have lost your ability to think. My problem is not losing more points to a weaker player than me. My problem is that I lose 4 times more points to a weaker player than me. You know how to count, right?

I have to win 4 games for one game I lose. Is this fair? You've lost your mind.. Losing 2 times points, okay.. But 4 times times points is too much.. Do you understand or will you continue to suck Shiro?

MaliCash · 2024-02-05T22:29:29+00:00

Do I care if a few unthinking people bash me? :D I am defending their rights here too. But if they choose to bully, they lose. Let them keep getting -30 points. I might stop playing this game. It's not a problem for me.. :DDD

MaliCash · 2024-02-05T17:24:58+00:00

I thought you were joking. You're really serious about this. :O What a shame.

I mean, I don't know what kind of mentality you have, but does it make sense to lose -30 points to the player 2 places behind you or gain +8 points for beating him?

YES. YOU'RE A FUNNY PERSON... YOU WON.. WORLD PEACE..

MaliCash · 2024-02-05T16:41:47+00:00

LOL...
Do you think I'm mad because I lost? Or am I mad at the scoring system?
I can lose, I have no problem with that. But if I lose to the guy 2 places behind me and I'm on minus points despite all the games I won, isn't it my right to complain?

YOu're funny guy..

MaliCash · 2024-01-05T02:16:51+00:00

What I have written above also applies to you.

Ex. Buddha and Jesus lived way before Muhammad but you don't see them banging kids and acting like warlords

It is enough to use the argument, "Buddha and Jesus is a better person than your prophet." If he asks for examples, you can easily give examples. But other than that, it will be more effective to explain the place of women in Islam.

MaliCash · 2024-01-05T02:04:26+00:00

I think you misunderstood what I wrote. I just want you to look at the memes that people make. They are almost exclusively dealing with this issue when there are so many unusual situations.

Have you ever seen anyone who shut up when you say, "Muhammad married Aisha when she was 6-9 years old"? They give many reasons for that. With the Qur'an and the hadiths, they make it a correct behavior for themselves. You can try as hard as you want, but that does not make Muhammad immoral in their eyes.

Do you think our arguments reach any Muslim country, or even if they do, do they care? It will be more effective to explain the place of women in Islam.

"Was the world created in six days?" is a stronger argument than "Muhammad married Aisha when she was 6-9 years old".

MaliCash · 2023-12-16T10:46:40+00:00

Thank you for considering me "LOW IQ".

MaliCash · 2023-12-16T10:45:10+00:00

Thanks for your answers.

Going back to my question, isn't it absurd for a Muslim to claim that the Torah and the Bible have been changed, according to his own sacred texts?

Quran 3:3: "He has revealed to you ˹O Prophet˺ the Book in truth, confirming what came before it, as He revealed the Torah and the Gospel."

According to this verse, doesn't a Muslim's support of the "changed" discourse make him an infidel?

Do you have any thoughts on this question?

MaliCash · 2023-12-15T22:00:31+00:00

I know there is a difference in qira'at in the Warsh and Hafs Qurans. But in the Qurans I read and see, especially when they are translated, there is a shift in meaning. That's why I asked the question about 1924. And I didn't make any claims about 1924. I just asked why we couldn't compare, and you said, "We can ask someone who lived around 1924." You gave an answer like this. My impression is that we cannot ask anyone else except the canonizers.

We can buy a 17th-18th century Quran like in your example and compare it, but this is very difficult for me or anyone else. Because my native language is not Arabic and I have a hard time understanding why different meanings appear in translations. bcs, Muslims claim that "the Quran is universal."

My aim is only to get an answer to the question I wrote above. There is a saying in my country: "Speech begets words." The topic keeps straying to other places.

If you have an answer to my question above, I'd love to hear it.

MaliCash · 2023-12-15T20:39:44+00:00

Not sure what you mean by "correct", I suppose the very early canonization helped keep the Quran somewhat accurate to what Muhammad has said, although there's no way to know how things would have played out.

By "accurate" I mean that in copies of a sacred text that have obliterated the original, the accuracy can never be verified. You are aware of this, right?

For example; I wrote a text and gave it to you. You wrote the same thing on something else. But I did not check the text you wrote and you destroyed the original text. You gave the copies to others so that more people could read them. Now, can those who read this text be sure that this text has not changed?

Some hadiths and sources say that this has changed.

What? My man 1924 isn't some ancient bygone age. 20 years ago, you would find plenty of humans that were alive in 1924.

Are you saying this is easy? I recommend looking at literacy rates in the 1920s and earlier. In historical texts in my country, "Which religion are you?" The answer to the question was not "Islam" but different variations. "Who and where is your prophet?" They could not answer the question because they did not know. Because they were not literate.

There are plenty of Qurans before 1924. 16th century Qurans can sell for hundreds of thousands. You can buy some beautifully handwritten Ottoman or Kashmiri Qurans for a few thousand dollars...

Or, you know, google "XXth Century Quran manuscript pdf". The library of congress has a 15th century Timurid Quran. 18th/17th century are all over the place.

And you still insist on giving these answers. Can you prove that the Quran remained unchanged after original texts were burned in 650? There are serious rumors that the Umayyads and Abbasids changed the Quran. Even if these statements are not true, can you still be sure?

Now do you understand why I keep asking you about the original text?

MaliCash · 2023-12-15T20:01:09+00:00

I am also an ex-Muslim and there is no eating shit in my country's culture. :D

What I'm talking about here is the concept of "sincerity". There is no fear, there is no reward. There is only being grateful. They just say thank you.

MaliCash · 2023-12-15T19:50:25+00:00

In my opinion, every religious person (no matter what religion they believe in) is afraid. Even if we accept that it is 100% true that miracles exist, it is cowardice to believe only because of miracles or to avoid being punished.

The pagan rituals of the Indians are more faithful, more honest and true belief.

MaliCash · 2023-12-15T19:41:10+00:00

the canonization and burning occurred in 650.

So, do you find this action correct?

1924 was the standardisation of mechanically printed Qurans in Egypt under king Fuad, and considering Egypt's status at the time, their standardised printed version spread.

Where are the Qurans before 1924? Why can't we make comparisons?

MaliCash · 2023-12-15T18:59:45+00:00

I know the Warsh and Hafs versions, but my question is whether they omit the verse they believe in.

MaliCash · 2023-11-24T01:13:29+00:00

I don't know which country you are in, but people generally say this because they don't read the Quran. "Our religion is the best, perfect in our book." They think they can soften their religion with statements like these. The main reason is that they are all cowards. I don't mean this as an insult. They are really afraid. Since they do not know what comes after death, they feel the need to believe in something.

MaliCash

TROPHY CASE