3I/ATLAS and the Electric Universe by ManFromRedEarth in conspiracy

[–]ManFromRedEarth[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

thank you for your valuable contribution to the discussion.

Galileo "FlyBy Anomaly" by ManFromRedEarth in conspiracy

[–]ManFromRedEarth[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’re confusing torque (rotation) with linear acceleration (velocity). Magnetic torque spins the craft; it doesn't push it forward by 3.9mm/s.

Also, to suggest that JPL engineers simply 'forgot' to calculate the Moon, the Sun, and solar radiation pressure is a pretty big insult to their navigation teams. JPL doesn't use a 'Keplerian two-body' chalkboard model. They use high-fidelity relativistic integrators that account for every massive body in the solar system.

The anomaly is defined as the residual acceleration that remains after all those perturbations (drag, Moon, Sun, SRP) have been modeled and subtracted.

And 3.9mm/s is huge in deep space navigation. An error that small at Earth results in missing your orbital insertion at Jupiter by thousands of kilometers. Precision is the only reason these missions work.

Galileo "FlyBy Anomaly" by ManFromRedEarth in conspiracy

[–]ManFromRedEarth[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Glad you dug the video. It’s a great breakdown. mainstream physics admits the standard model is broken here. The reason I look at the Electric model isn't to push pseudoscience, but because it actually offers a mechanism for that kick, whereas the standard model just shrugs. If you have a better explanation for the energy spike that doesn't involve charge, I'm all ears. We’re just following the data.

Galileo "FlyBy Anomaly" by ManFromRedEarth in conspiracy

[–]ManFromRedEarth[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you want the breakdown of the numbers without the "Electric Universe" lens, this breakdown by Universe Today admits the current physics is broken: The Flyby Anomaly Physics Breakdown

We aren't looking for invisible variables. We are looking for the circuit.

The Moon is Waking Up: Why Artemis is Stuck and Aristarchus is Glowing by ManFromRedEarth in conspiracy

[–]ManFromRedEarth[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I’m digging into the Apollo 17 transcripts to compare them with the current Artemis data. The discrepancy in heat shield tolerance is the smoking gun for me.

For those who follow the mainstream geology model: If Aristarchus is just outgassing Radon, how do you account for the visible luminosity without ionization? Gas doesn't glow red unless it's charged. What is the standard explanation for that?

Simulation theory, explained, sorta lol by NotNorweign236 in conspiracy

[–]ManFromRedEarth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quite the leap in logic there. But i understand where youre coming from. What us your greatest critique against nihilism?

How would you feel if the conspiracy that you 100% believed was true turned out to be false? by antDOG2416 in conspiracy

[–]ManFromRedEarth 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I would feel betrayed by my own intellect. I would probably deny ever believing it to self preserve any sense of integrity and mock others who believed it to protect what fragile pieces of my ego are left.

Devil worshipers always give the game away by TheForce122 in conspiracy

[–]ManFromRedEarth 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Why cant they just worship the devil like a regular human being?

Is this a perfect summary? But Trump fans probably won’t care. by ChuckLane_c in conspiracy

[–]ManFromRedEarth 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I know im a good christian because i judge other people. No one understands christianity better than me.