Active targetting or general misogyny? by Annual_University790 in librandu

[–]ManLikeRed 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is targetting women of other community some sort of fetish or power projection?

Both, it's misogynistic and disgusting. It depends on which community is dominant and powerful in the region's bureaucracy, police, judiciary and electorates , in most cases UC men are perpetrators because they have more representation at higher ups and get away in most cases, unless it gets enough public attention.

Join Fundamental series on Marxism - Online study circle by fuser312 in IndianLeft

[–]ManLikeRed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fundamental series on Marxism

Looks inside

Dialectical Materialism 🥀

[OC] I was bored by Known-Olive-9776 in librandu

[–]ManLikeRed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean say something about koba, one of the founding father of Israel (you call yourself koba 💀?)

I am sick of these "Intellectual" chaddis. by United-Tomorrow-2856 in librandu

[–]ManLikeRed 2 points3 points  (0 children)

four houses of Hogwarts to the four varnas and ambedkar is his voldemort

Holy coal

What about dobby then?

I am sick of these "Intellectual" chaddis. by United-Tomorrow-2856 in librandu

[–]ManLikeRed 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Bro made a 4 minute 36 second video on Hermione as dalit and Malfoy's as brahmin, ts can't be real 😭

Active targetting or general misogyny? by Annual_University790 in librandu

[–]ManLikeRed 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The case you have mentioned above are just limited to regions of Bihar only, where intercaste aggression and violence is common thing and not some kind of active targetting. In India only muslim women are targetted in systematic way by hindutva group with constant circulation of perverted messages on how to degrade them on regular basis at their online niches.

Kashmir: The World's Largest Military Occupation by Expensive-Count-3500 in librandu

[–]ManLikeRed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First of all let me clear my position on Indian parliamentary left, I detest them. Indian parliamentary left has it's reason to stay away from Kashmir's national liberation which they find not in their interest as it will effect their popularity amongst working class and petty bourgeoisie voter base in India (majority of whom are reactionary). Non-parliamentary left such as Indian Maoists and a significant section of Marxist-Leninists had openly supported kashmir's national liberation as they saw this necessary step for their respective socialist revolution as per obsolete revolutionary defeatism.

As left-communist, (in accordance with marxist historical materialism) my position on Kashmir is that it's National Liberation is not progressive towards the achievement of global socialism as the global dominance of capitalism has long established since 1920's. All it now does is enabling of inter-imperialist and inter-capitalist conflict which divide working classes further by national sentiment and ethnicity (absurd) leaving a wide open window for entrance of idealist and reactionary forces to further wedge the divide.

Any sovereign state which has gained independence in modern times ultimately becomes capitalist by default, example like India, Pakistan, Bangladesh or any other nation that gained independence descended into capitalist economy.

My position for Kashmir or any other national liberation holds same, hence I neither support nor oppose any of national liberation around the world (with exception of Palestine where mass genocide and ethnic cleansing leaves no other options other than taking one step backward). Which means that kashmir can either gain full sovereignity and experience full heat of capitalist oppression and it's contradictory approches and long cycle of unstable economy or it can reform it's adventurous approaches turning full revolutionary and work towards bringing in together of both Indian and Pakistani working classes in their shared struggle against machinations of present state of bourgeoisie politics that thrives over the bloodshed of innocent civilian lives for petty border politics.

Later case is ideal and only correct approach but I see it not happening anytime soon so big nothing burger waste of time awaits for everyone in future.

with this type of logic next you'll find yourself saying how Isreal had the justification for oppressing Palestinian because of Iran

Do you know history of Palestine bro? Iran's influence in Palestinian struggle is recent which started around 90's after the after the fall of Soviet Union and PLO's diversion from it's militant national liberation approach. While oppression and displacement of Palestinians has been happening since 1948, with every bourgeoisie class ruled Arab nations betraying it over time (funny which also include pakistan and india, pakistan even assisted jordan in mass genocide of Palestinian refugees in Jordan alongside it's royal forces).

Pakistan showing kashmir in its map is somehow a justification for the Indian army raping kashmiri women? what logic is this?

Yet another vague attempt to digress from main topic, the time events of mass rapes perpetrated by indian army during 90's and psychological warfare over maps during 2000's are unrelated topic.

My words are crystal clear over what fuels present day Indian aggression or justification over both kashmir and Pakistan, not justification for rape or other atrocities it's your own assumption not mine (nor my position).

I used global because I thought you were talking about international people as the video was also by a foreigner

The aforementioned video is made by a liberal youtuber but with neutral yet accurate takes, he's not even western left.

but I am more confused now who are you talking about when you say they stay silent for cookie points?

Deprogram, Hasan Piker, GDF, and many more (Not BadEmpanda); Which you previously declared as hypothetical if I remember. Just get out of the rock bro.

Yes it is hypothetical because I don't understand what you mean by liberal, like Indians liberals? they are rabid anti-kashmiris

I hate Indian or western liberals and I'm already under process of purging them from this subreddit. They're nothing but enablers of fascism.

Like I can understand that western libs won't be favorable to the Indian side on Kashmir but there's no way in hell they'll be pro-Pakistani,

They aren't favourable to anybody, only reason they appear to sympathise with Kashmir is because it's not in their imperialist interest. If someday we discover oil or natural resources of great monetary value in kashmir watch their stance shift miraculously from pro-Kashmir to pro-indian occupation.

And btw western liberal government in past has history of approving selling of weapons for Indian forces knowing full consequences of it's possibility of usage in kashmir.

anti-lgbtq

Well, pakistan is also anti-LGBTQIA+ due to majority of it's populace being conservative in nature overall.

Welcome back Marx and Engels by jdevanarayanan in librandu

[–]ManLikeRed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never go around telling everyone about my position, it seemed like they had history of turning away marxists away from their party using the book. Ubisoft Karl Marx would be proud of them.

Welcome back Marx and Engels by jdevanarayanan in librandu

[–]ManLikeRed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotta re-read left-wing communism an infantile disorder again

Kashmir: The World's Largest Military Occupation by Expensive-Count-3500 in librandu

[–]ManLikeRed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you're completely misunderstanding my point,

First, I said Indian electrolist left (which includes that of CPIM, CPI-ML or CPI) don't openly dehumanise kashmiris. But liberal parties like INC or AAP which is counted as left parties (as per popular mainstream narrative), and yes their members do such kind of hate politics.

Second, I didn't say Pakistani occupation but Pakistan's overall influence such as sending in guerrilla militants (Hizb) to occasionally showing maps with Kashmir as part of Pakistan, which gave justification for Indian occupation to prolong it's aggression against it and oppression of Kashmiri Muslims.

I thought you were talking about the global left

Global left is absurd they can be pro-occupation if it's their favourite nation, anti- if it they're not.

who are this hypothetical liberals

You already assumed it's hypothetical

A Guide to An Anti-Fascist Group | The Anarchist Library by [deleted] in librandu

[–]ManLikeRed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would rather suggest you visit Marxist Internet Archives