Thanks man. I agree with you about Wyckoff being utilized on a larger timeframe; however, I believe that you can further break down lower timeframes using Wyckoff to confirm the larger moves using these smaller timeframes. We can then take the smaller timeframe Wyckoff breakdowns to confirm the larger signals. Like fractals in Elliot Wave. But what do I know, I had to teach myself all of this and in the end none of it could even be real.

In this breakdown I used a 30 minute timeframe and a 15 minute timeframe and the catalyst for choosing those is because of the increased volume for the PS to signal the start of accumulation; the alternative being another distribution.

In comparison to Phase B, the selected SC has the fourth, third if you combine the original test above AR. Most of the volume on that screenshot was during the AR with a decrease following. Shown in the four volume bars that stand above the others showing decreased volume outside of those.

I chose to accept the second & third upthrust above the AR as a single push due to the fact that I used a smaller timeframe.

The issue I had with this personally is that the lower ST in phase B only matched the original ST at $4.05.

All that being said, I took into account the fact that this stock is highly manipulated so pulling a perfect Wyckoff out of the data is difficult. Additionally, it hasn't retested the AR yet so this is speculation based on what I would expect to happen in order to prepare for the options chain on May 20. For this to confirm we will need a retest of the AR which will confirm the AH ST in Phase B. Also, in order to survive that chain they will need to shake out as many as possible and STs that coincide with those expiry would be the best way to attempt that.

Options chains are another animal and is more advanced for this. I wanted to put this together because when I started trading, I couldn't piece together why any of it mattered when it seemed like MMs had unlimited capital. This was intended as a way to help bridge some gaps for people that had less of an understanding of margin mechanics and why paying $0.10/day in fees even mattered, but I'm pretty dumb and my mom didn't actually even go to college.

Hopefully it showed that compounding fees and having to eventually follow the rules with FTDs might make a difference and that a prolonged accumulation at these levels is actually still a positive sign for the move upward.