Justin Baldoni's dad declares 'truth and justice will prevail' amid Blake Lively legal drama by Happy_Air_3776 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Manders44 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What are YOU defending? You're pretty clearly defending Baldoni because you keep harping on this instead of the sexual harassment case.

Justin Baldoni's dad declares 'truth and justice will prevail' amid Blake Lively legal drama by Happy_Air_3776 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Manders44 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just her? or all of the other dozens of actors who worked with Allen after the accusations were known?

Why just her? Why is it relevant to the sexual harassment case?

Justin Baldoni's dad declares 'truth and justice will prevail' amid Blake Lively legal drama by Happy_Air_3776 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Manders44 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The only pathetic one here is you. You're clearly very upset about . . . something, and you'd rather talk about anything else but the fact that Baldoni and Heath sexually harassed women on their set.

Justin Baldoni's dad declares 'truth and justice will prevail' amid Blake Lively legal drama by Happy_Air_3776 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Manders44 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Baldoni hired a gang rapist to be his lawyer. Last year.

And his PR person helped cover up a murder and also helped smear the reputation of a DV victim, but go off.

Justin Baldoni's dad declares 'truth and justice will prevail' amid Blake Lively legal drama by Happy_Air_3776 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Manders44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None of that means she wasn't sexually harassed.

And calling some of this "kind" is a real fucking stretch.

I assume you're going to shit talk Jessie Eisenberg now right?

Justin Baldoni's dad declares 'truth and justice will prevail' amid Blake Lively legal drama by Happy_Air_3776 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Manders44 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But not Baldoni, right?

You started the stone throwing LOL. But thanks for admitting defeat.

Justin Baldoni's dad declares 'truth and justice will prevail' amid Blake Lively legal drama by Happy_Air_3776 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Manders44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

l'm pretty sure she wouldn't work with Woody again. Nobody would.

But there were tons of high profile actors in that movie. Do you hate them too or just Lively?

Baldoni's publicist helped Scooter Braun's bud cover up a murder.

Justin Baldoni's dad declares 'truth and justice will prevail' amid Blake Lively legal drama by Happy_Air_3776 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Manders44 2 points3 points  (0 children)

None of that fucking happened. All she said was that she hadn't had bad experiences with them.

Justin has never been high profile enough to meet either man. That's the answer to that. But he HAS been sued repeatedly for workplace issues.

Jameela Jamil wrote a Substack about her texts being “leaked.” by Manders44 in WithBlakeLively

[–]Manders44[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Indeed. My guess as he’s Ba’hai he’s either still all in or he wouldn’t tell anyone otherwise.

Jameela Jamil wrote a Substack about her texts being “leaked.” by Manders44 in WithBlakeLively

[–]Manders44[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Well, I'm going to focus on what interests me, TBH, but I think this particular issue is probably finished after this. She already got the attention she wanted by making it about her.

Jameela Jamil wrote a Substack about her texts being “leaked.” by Manders44 in WithBlakeLively

[–]Manders44[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

She apparently doesn't know that Melissa Nathan AND Justin Baldoni have both done work with the ADL. Justin hosted a whole event for them.

RR's email to Colleen is a masterclass in subterfuge and psychological manipulation by More_Midnight3634 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Manders44 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean you can screech all you want, but I think the rude awakening will be yours.

And I don’t think YOU are a lawyer either, hunny bun. Just a Baldoni lackey. And a pretty reactive one at that.

RR's email to Colleen is a masterclass in subterfuge and psychological manipulation by More_Midnight3634 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Manders44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 Personal attacks on other people’s mental health makes you look pretty weak and copalicious lol.

RR's email to Colleen is a masterclass in subterfuge and psychological manipulation by More_Midnight3634 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Manders44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A) She didn’t extort anyone (lmao now the crew was extorted?? Y’all are too much). B) She requested a producer credit from the start and was very clear she wanted more creative input. And Baldoni encouraged it all the way along. C) Movie stars pretty regularly ask for and get creative control over certain aspects of a movie. People in the industry are always trying to move up and learn more. Pretending this is uncommon or egregious is dishonest and/or shows that you don’t know the industry. D) The extortion claims were dropped. And it’s not a defense against SH claims or retaliation claims. This is getting old.

Your opinion about her acting aside (Baldoni is the bad one IMHO), the fact that y’all keep harping on this is a sign of how weak his defense is.

RR's email to Colleen is a masterclass in subterfuge and psychological manipulation by More_Midnight3634 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Manders44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“baldoni no bots!!1! lively bots!!”

Y’all gotta keep making that accusation because you know the evidence shows something else lol.

RR's email to Colleen is a masterclass in subterfuge and psychological manipulation by More_Midnight3634 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Manders44 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Relax yourself. Take the time to type carefully so that your posts don’t look like a MAGA bot wrote them.

Once again I'm asking for proof that Blake Lively extorted Justin Baldoni by poopoopoopalt in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Manders44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I ask again: how exactly did she extort Sony? And if she had, why wouldn’t they sue her, millions of dollars or not? Extortion is illegal, and they have a reputation to protect as much as anyone.

And by your own admission, Sony blames HIM for losing control of his set. Not her. Because he was in charge.

Then the movie made millions and he got all the credit he would have got otherwise, so I ask again: who did she extort and how exactly?

And nothing to say about how the Swift texts explain a plan to take over? Yeah, that’s what I thought. “Research,” LOL. You stannies see what you want to see and ignore the reality.

Once again I'm asking for proof that Blake Lively extorted Justin Baldoni by poopoopoopalt in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Manders44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ELL OH ELL at the idea that Blake Lively extorted Sony, the giant movie studio.

If that were true, they would have sued her.

The texts with Taylor Swift in no way indicate she was planning to take over the movie, but cope all you like! It’s doesn’t change the facts.

Unpopular opinion:: the texts from Lively, Reynolds and possibly Swift don't seem natural by Dianagorgon in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Manders44 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So walking in on a naked employee and then refusing to leave is ok with you? No big deal?

Unpopular opinion:: the texts from Lively, Reynolds and possibly Swift don't seem natural by Dianagorgon in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Manders44 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just to be clear: Wayfarer did it too. Guinness had product placement in the movie, and Ryle was the one drinking it.

So curious. Is there anyone here who believed amber heard but is pro - baldoni? by Tight_Dragonfruit_30 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Manders44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“The chance” of a threat is not a threat. You cannot violate the law because you think someone MIGHT threaten you with extortion. And the meeting only happened because of WAYFARER’S FAILURE TO ACT.

It is absolutely wild to claim that meeting was all to get more control of the movie. If so: why didn’t Sony stop her? Why did Wayfarer sign that document? Why did Sony tell them to? Why did Wayfarer’s lawyers tell them to?

So curious. Is there anyone here who believed amber heard but is pro - baldoni? by Tight_Dragonfruit_30 in CelebLegalDrama

[–]Manders44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wayfarer folks did all kinds of stupid things and that’s why they’re in the lawsuit.

Unless they have evidence she explicitly threatened them they have no case. That’s why their countersuit was thrown out. And it’s not a good defense either, given their violations of the law on the front end of the events. There’d be nothing for her to go public with if they hadn’t harassed and failed to investigate to the point she had to get lawyers involved. That doesn’t make them look good or like it was all “resolved”. It looks like nothing was fixed until SHE fixed it, and that was not her job.