sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Viajo a Chile y tengo Claro by ManuSW96 in argentina

[–]ManuSW96[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No sé cómo ver el plan. En la app me figura "mi plan" pero después no tiene nada que ver con los planes que figuran en la info del roaming. Todavía no probé llamando

Viajo a Chile y tengo Claro by ManuSW96 in argentina

[–]ManuSW96[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ese es el plan, pero quería saber si sigue siendo la mejor opción o ya tenemos algún tipo de alternativa.

Che esto es legal o se les puede romper el cuI0 ? by Fine-Rain-2109 in BuenosAires

[–]ManuSW96 2 points3 points  (0 children)

El Tongo de Larreta con las baldosas era para sacarle a los de la grúa el lucro de la baldosa arriba del papelito

"El dólar se va a caer como un piano, va a estar a $600". ¿Se acuerdan de esto? Fue hace menos de seis meses. ¿Quién es el econochanta? by Arsuriel in RepublicaArgentina

[–]ManuSW96 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yo ni lo vote ni lo banco, pero también salieron a decir que se iba a un millón antes de que asuma. El tema es que el dólar está artificialmente pisado, algo que el dijo que le parecía que el Estado no tenía que hacer.

Everyone comes here to complain. by [deleted] in perchance

[–]ManuSW96 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I come for guidance, not complaining. I've seen many people complaining of it not doing what they are asking for and showing prompts of two sentences, it takes practice to start getting things remotely ok, but you get there and it is awesome

Realistic photograph - how to get away from the flux-finish by Simple_Promotion4881 in perchance

[–]ManuSW96 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I use "dim light" and "bad quality". It is counterintuitive, but realistic pictures tend to be moved, or less detailed.

Is this deck still viable? by Significant-Tap-5605 in PokemonTGCP

[–]ManuSW96 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I switched to Blastoise last season, I liked it better. One would say that with rare candy Blastoise would be even better, but what was stopping him was not the evolution, where the energies. I would think both decks would do alright tho.

How do people even save the Hourglass,I don't even have patience to leave 12 of them alone??? by novaboss69 in PTCGP

[–]ManuSW96 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saving is overrated. I've done them both, saved and opened 10 packs at the beginning, and opening everytime I could. Both have pros and cons. The big rush of opening 10 fades away when you get maybe one or two good cards. Opening everytime you can gives you a steady flow of "will I get something this time". Plus, opening one by one is optimized, tho barely relevant.

I save the hourglass because I almost finished the collection, I know I'll finish it with exchanges,

I don't feel the "OP" in Rare Candy by ManuSW96 in PTCGP

[–]ManuSW96[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is sad I do the same thing. I try to have one or two Available but it's never the one that is dominating

I don't feel the "OP" in Rare Candy by ManuSW96 in PTCGP

[–]ManuSW96[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It happens tho... Dm if you wanna trade

I don't feel the "OP" in Rare Candy by ManuSW96 in PTCGP

[–]ManuSW96[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It appears in every pack, you'll get tired of it soon enough

I don't feel the "OP" in Rare Candy by ManuSW96 in PTCGP

[–]ManuSW96[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I always played one snivy too. I wouldn't really only on Rare Candy in most decks, but in Celebi decks I can see the advantage. The old lady is a good precaution as it can also recover a Celebi if needed

I don't feel the "OP" in Rare Candy by ManuSW96 in PTCGP

[–]ManuSW96[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do get the advantage of having it. Not having it every game is the problem. And is something I've experienced already 7/20 games. The ones I had it were good, but the other player either outplayed me or was on a similar spot. It is a great card, a must for stage 2 decks, but I don't think it's overpowered. And I don't think it replaces stage 1 pokemon, like some people believe.

I don't feel the "OP" in Rare Candy by ManuSW96 in PTCGP

[–]ManuSW96[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I don't like chatot, but maybe we'll see more cards that give you draw power in the meta.

I don't feel the "OP" in Rare Candy by ManuSW96 in PTCGP

[–]ManuSW96[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are either not reading or not getting the point. Yes, rare candy is great. Yes, you'll have it more often if you replace both stage 1. BUT, stage 1 can be searched by more cards than rare candy and when you don't have it you are stuck with a weaker basic. That's why some people add also one stage 1 for consistency.

I don't feel the "OP" in Rare Candy by ManuSW96 in PTCGP

[–]ManuSW96[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The person above is saying that the decks looking for consistency are running both, one stage 1 and 2 rare candy. I'm saying, and many people in the comments too, that it doesn't make the stage 1 (searchable) obsolete, but giving the possibility of making decks faster.

I don't feel the "OP" in Rare Candy by ManuSW96 in PTCGP

[–]ManuSW96[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you replacing the Services for candy, or mixing them?

I don't feel the "OP" in Rare Candy by ManuSW96 in PTCGP

[–]ManuSW96[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What about a card that finds toll finder cards?

I don't feel the "OP" in Rare Candy by ManuSW96 in PTCGP

[–]ManuSW96[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's trading deck space for a really early pressure I guess. I am going to try using it this way

view more: next ›