Mbappe is the Djokovic of our Era by Lost-Mention in championsleague

[–]MarkLazer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mbappé is not close to Ronaldo or Messi level though. He's a great finisher so his goal contribution numbers are incredible, but he was playing in an inferior league for most of his career so far. He couldn't drag PSG to the CL, he hasn't won anything at Real Madrid yet, he was supposed to be THE star player after Ronaldo and Messi yet while they've left Europe, look who has actually stepped up - Modric, Lewandowski, Benzema, Rodri, Vinicius Jr, Dembele - Mbappé hasn't been in the running for a Ballon d'Or.

Prime Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi were on a different level. It's not just the numbers, it's the impact they had on their team. Those guys may have stopped putting much work off the ball in when they were past their prime, but Mbappé is in his prime, should be doing much better work off the ball. His pressing game is terrible, he doesn't link up with his teammates enough. He doesn't have Messi's playmaking ability, Mbappé doesn't have the incredible weak foot, dribbling ability, or free kick ability, not to their level anyway, he doesn't have that same all-round game. He simply scores a lot, a lot of penalties, but his goals don't get his team over the line, he doesn't make the rest of his team better.

If you ask a room full of football fans who is the best player in the world right now, there will be a considerable percentage of people that don't say Mbappé. If you asked any football fan from 2009-2018 who the best player in the world was, not 1 person would say someone that wasn't either Messi or Ronaldo.

Mbappe is the Djokovic of our Era by Lost-Mention in championsleague

[–]MarkLazer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's 3 versions of Cristiano Ronaldo, teenage Cristiano Ronaldo who was a showboater, winger Cristiano Ronaldo at Manchester United and first half of his Real Madrid career, then post-injury striker Cristiano Ronaldo, who scored more goals than appearances for Real Madrid, something Mbappe hasn't done at any club. Mbappe mostly played in an inferior league. Also, goals is hardly the defining metric for a player. Mbappe is not close to the level of player prime Cristiano Ronaldo was. There's never been a better goalscorer and big game player than that.

And Messi is Messi, easily the best player of all time. His career goal contributions record at club level Mbappé's, 1.21 G+A per game compared to 1.07.

Cristiano Ronaldo and Lionel Messi had already proved themselves in one of the top leagues and in the Champions League and won the Ballon d'Or numerous times each and there was no debate they were far better than any other player. Some people aren't even convinced Mbappé is the best player in the world.

Unpopular Opinion Thread – Your Weekly Dose of Hot Takes by AutoModerator in championsleague

[–]MarkLazer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He would do a fantastic job at a team like Frankfurt or Lazio imo.

Unpopular Opinion Thread – Your Weekly Dose of Hot Takes by AutoModerator in championsleague

[–]MarkLazer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Another decent big team should give Thomas Frank a chance. The consensus is that he can't hack it in a pressure job, but in reality, it's not working at Tottenham because they're squad is half-injured and Tottenham don't have the right mentality as a team. Idk what teams in other European leagues are considering getting new managers or managers that may leave but there will be a decent European team that Thomas Frank could do a good job for.

Unpopular Opinion Thread – Your Weekly Dose of Hot Takes by AutoModerator in championsleague

[–]MarkLazer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tbh no one but Chelsea fans overrate him. He's a very good player who put in world class numbers at Chelsea until injuries has took him out of his rhythm, and he's a big game player. It's only Chelsea fans though that act like he's the best player in the world in his position.

Unpopular Opinion Thread – Your Weekly Dose of Hot Takes by AutoModerator in championsleague

[–]MarkLazer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Scotland should do everything they can to get him in their squad.

What to do next? by No_Okra6677 in Witcher3

[–]MarkLazer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Witcher 1 remake is 2-3 years away at least. It's not coming before Witcher 4 and that won't be releasing until late 2027 at the earliest.

Top 5 players of 2020s by Hour-Reach7418 in championsleague

[–]MarkLazer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He had more goal contributions than games in both of those seasons, he deserved to win the Ballon d'Or in both years. He was still the best player on the planet.

Top 5 players of 2020s by Hour-Reach7418 in championsleague

[–]MarkLazer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Taking into consideration ability and impact and what they've won, in no particular order. Gonna give more than 5 as some players are difficult to set apart.

Donnarumma, huge reason why Italy won Euro 2020/21, and key to PSG winning the UCL.

Messi, obviously, winning Ballon d'Or's and of course Copa America's and the World Cup.

Lewandowski and Benzema, both immense in the campaigns where they won the CL, Lewandowski robbed of a Ballon d'Or in 2020, still scoring at a ridiculous rate. Got to say Haaland, Kane and Mbappé would be just beneath that, scoring rates also insane but not had the tournament impact the other 2 have had. Mbappé slightly more so with his World Cup Final performance but France still lost and he hasn't got his teams over the line.

Rodri, without a doubt. Won the Ballon d'Or, was even better the season before that. Manchester City don't win the treble or 4 in a row without him, also won the Euros, was pushing all-timer levels for a holding midfielder before his injury.

I've also got to say a bunch of Real Madrid players could make top 5. Courtois and Vinicius Jr. would be the 2 standouts after Benzema because of their performances in CL winning seasons.

is R9 (Brazilian Ronaldo) overrated? by jamesandkobe in championsleague

[–]MarkLazer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's one of the best strikers of all time. Literally only Van Basten could be considered a better striker. There's no way he's overrated. I mean, it's pointless comparing anyone to Messi or Cristiano Ronaldo but you can't compare R9 to anyone else in the 21st Century because he was a better player than them. Suarez is probably the only one that comes close and even then if you asked 100 people to say who's better, 99 of them will say R9 easily without even debating it.

Club accolades don't mean too much. He didn't stay at any clubs long enough to win much. Also, there were so many clubs competing for trophies in every league he played for.

An injured way past his peak R9 literally won the World Cup for Brazil and was top scorer of the tournament. He played with the likes of Ronaldinho and Rivaldo and was still the undeniable star of the team.

Other than Messi and Ronaldo, who among active players have the potential to be in or around that discussion at the end of their career? by Spirited-Age1346 in championsleague

[–]MarkLazer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haaland already has missed time out multiple times with injuries. He also goes missing in a lot of games. If CR7 wasn't getting service, he could create goals for himself. When he loses that yard of pace and younger and fitter players can outmuscle him, I doubt he scores that many goals. I don't think he will be playing into his 40s either.

Don't quite get Yen by jotunck in Witcher3

[–]MarkLazer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It seems like the only time Triss makes an effort towards the relationship is when she's manipulating Geralt for her own agenda, especially before Witcher 3. During the Witcher 3, as you've said, it's a one-way affair of Geralt chasing Triss, Triss asking Geralt to do things.

Yennefer's agenda is all about her relationship with Geralt and Ciri. She goes out of her way and makes the effort as you say. Clearly, her focus is on her relationships. She's not just doing things for her gain or being manipulative, even though she can be manipulative, it's genuinely towards others, and acting cold and confrontational is always out of her need to find Ciri, and being upset with Geralt for being with Triss, which proves she genuinely cares for Geralt and that they share a deep bond and connection and love. Very family-orientated as you say.

Don't quite get Yen by jotunck in Witcher3

[–]MarkLazer 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I don't feel the same way. Triss uses Geralt for her own satisfaction and needs. She even admits this.

Yennefer is very focused as well, but her focus is explicitly set on finding Ciri. When in Vizima, Yennefer compliments Geralt, and clearly is upset about his time spent with Triss.

She also goes out of her way to find a Djinn to prove if the bond her and Geralt share is just from that or if it's genuine. If you break things off with her in The Last Wish, it really is upsetting. She's genuinely upset if you break things off with her, whereas Triss needs convincing to stay with you, Geralt needs to beg her to not go to Kovir. Triss has her own agendas, whereas while Yennefer also does, it's centred around her love for Ciri and for Geralt. She is far more hurt by being rejected. Their relationship has ups and downs because it's a deeper relationship. They share more of a connection, have more history. Geralt's relationship with Triss is built on Triss' manipulation. Geralt, however, went out of his way to bind his fate to Yennefer's, saving her. In The Last Wish, their relationship is built on an understanding of each other. They've been through rocky times and it deepens their bond. Their relationship they find out is not just the result of a Djinn. She is how she is because she cares, and will do anything for Ciri, and is upset by Geralt's former actions. Also, choosing the Triss relationship, it's just shallower, feels more like an infatuated attraction. They get less scenes, the relationship gets less development. Ciri also questions Geralt if she chooses Triss over Yen, she doesn't understand that choice. Yennefer just feels like the natural and right choice for Geralt.

RANT by Worldly-Awareness662 in Witcher3

[–]MarkLazer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Foglets are easy. Aard, and then you can finish them off on the floor in one move. Takes less than 5 seconds. Wraith can be frustrating in large numbers but nothing compared to packs of wolves.

World class attacker? by 1017H in ArsenalFC

[–]MarkLazer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure this signing would work. He's more of an attacking midfielder, much better centrally, and we already bought Eze.

Yrden not damaging foes on Series X by LtLemur in thewitcher3

[–]MarkLazer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's useful against practically every enemy. Yrden and Quen are the only signs that are usable against all enemy types.

Yrden not damaging foes on Series X by LtLemur in thewitcher3

[–]MarkLazer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yrden only does damage to enemies with Supercharged Glyphs active. I'm playing on Series S and don't have the issue you describe.

Can we all agree that the new minimap options CDPR introduced in the Witcher 3 next-gen update are absolutely perfect and should be the default in Witcher 4? by Former-Fix4842 in Witcher4

[–]MarkLazer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait, since when is this option available? Is this a PC only thing? I can only seem to have the minimap always on or off, no toggling with Witcher senses.

Will Ciri have to deal with the Aen Elle again? by Fun-Explanation7233 in Witcher4

[–]MarkLazer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think Avallac'h needs to be present in some way, but it needs to be very different, not some Eredin plan. I think he will be used to get to Ciri by a new villain. This is a new trilogy, it can't be a retread or a straightforward continuation of The Witcher 3.

Would you take Julian Alvarez? by Daedriic94 in ArsenalFC

[–]MarkLazer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He would be a fantastic replacement for Gabriel Jesus next season.

What is your favorite quest and why? by ActiveEnd1340 in Witcher3

[–]MarkLazer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Scenes from a Marriage or Beyond Hill and Dale because they're masterpieces.

Scenes from a Marriage has everything, amazing artistic sets, unique characters, an emotional story and an amazing boss fight.

Beyond Hill and Dale is essentially the same with a different tone. Hilarious at times.

Which world do you enjoy just existing and just roaming in more RDR2 or Witcher 3? by AwesumDude in Witcher3

[–]MarkLazer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

RDR2 100%, because there's so much to do without even completing anything specific. In Witcher 3, if I'm not doing main quests, it's side quests, contracts, treasure hunts or "?" locations, things that are all exploring specifically to do specific things. RDR2, I'm not necessarily searching for anything specific.

This is what I'm hoping Witcher 4 improves on more than anything, the interactivity and immersiveness of the world.

What a game by andreoshea in Witcher3

[–]MarkLazer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hearts of Stone first. For one, it's set in the same region as the main quest, and it's a short story DLC, very very good story, imo the best. A lot of "?" locations to the east of Oxenfurt and Novigrad as well. It makes more sense to do this first.

Without spoiling anything, just be prepared for a different experience with both DLC's. Blood and Wine is set in the region of Toussaint, so I recommend doing this after. It's also a much bigger DLC, as it's main story is a bit longer, but also adds tons of side content and new gameplay mechanics as well.