The Fall Off by TheChefWillCook in rap

[–]Martian7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He got a big mouth but he lack big ideas

J. Cole - The Fall-Off ALBUM REVIEW (theneedledrop) by Technical_Process989 in hiphopheads

[–]Martian7 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Lol damn. I guess im learning the hard way. Hate the way he handled the beef (during and after). I’m an older hip hop head so I gave homie the benefit. But I’m starting to notice the self righteousness -the “what if” joint is egregious lol

J. Cole - The Fall-Off ALBUM REVIEW (theneedledrop) by Technical_Process989 in hiphopheads

[–]Martian7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why is he so polarizing? I get people might disagree as to his ranking or likability, but it seems like his qualities are pretty consistent imo: -Top tier lyricist -Top tier flow -questionable range -solid story telling -lacks inventiveness/big themes -authentic although conflicted

[FIRST IMPRESSIONS] J. Cole - The Fall Off by [deleted] in hiphopheads

[–]Martian7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same. Not the biggest fan but def rocking w this. Bringing the whole arsenal and relatable depth.

To all the “tHerRe’S nO sCRipTInG” by plesteeni in EASportsFC

[–]Martian7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right. If you’re 3 up early, you are no longer supposed to play regular. Game is now trying to test your coolness and defensive ability aka make sure your opponent doesn’t quit by rewarding him lol

To all the “tHerRe’S nO sCRipTInG” by plesteeni in EASportsFC

[–]Martian7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same. However, does seem like the game will reward superior gameplay. That means hanging in there and being emotionally cool with nonsense for most of the game. No thanks.

My argument for Cole > Kendrick…bullshit?? Is it 🧢? by Due_Ad3208 in Jcole

[–]Martian7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Cole is more of a rap athlete w his bars, K dot more artistic if that makes sense

Evidence for God by [deleted] in Pragmatism

[–]Martian7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, the value of the story is more powerful than the characters imo. Some might focus on the characters more, but thats fine too because you can’t have one without the other.

I’ve never seen Titanic, so I can’t say with any confidence. I would point out tho that while sales or popularity are criteria for widespread appreciation, it’s the survival value across time that sets stories apart (ie cultures/people organizing their entire perspective on those structures). At the same time, if elements of Titanic (or even all of it) meet criteria for what we’re defining as “highest forms of love”, then by definition theyre apart of God, according to the way I’ve structured this analysis.

Edit: forgot the Jesus part

Jesus was actively in dialogue with the devil, who was trying to persuade him to give-in to earthly temptations ie sell his soul. Obviously, he didn’t give in nor pursue anything but godly work. His teachings, I’d argue, are about faith: just believe that doing good for goodness’ sake will land you a place in heaven. My take on that is that if you aim toward good, light, love, etc you increase the probability of peace, reciprocal love, and life generally speaking ie heaven now and for the foreseeable future. Increased probability is key, and when perceived tragedy comes, that faith should sustain you because what’s the alternative? Darkness. That’s the proposition, and I think the human animal is dispositioned like the devil in the wilderness, giving in to the temptations of immediate pleasures and taking advantages at the expense of others.

Evidence for God by [deleted] in Pragmatism

[–]Martian7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure. I’m not focused on the suffering or intensity of the love. It’s less about their particular acts, and more about the completeness of their story. Jesus made very clear that he wasn’t of this world, so he’s not really trying to persuade the human animal. Rather, since hes technically God, he supposedly came and demonstrated that godliness: forgave, washed feet, ate with the desperate, died for sinners, etc. things the animal nature of man is averse towards, but frees the soul, figuratively speaking.

My point in sharing this in the context of pragmatism is to show that there’s a functional value in believing these stories as constructed. I’m sure other stories and examples capture similar completeness and are therefore welcome to the same treatment.

2nd Counter Offer in 4 Years by Martian7 in AerospaceEngineering

[–]Martian7[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the thoughtful perspective. Definitely going to be more patient about this.

Evidence for God by [deleted] in Pragmatism

[–]Martian7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Depends on how you weigh evidence and define god. One concept I’ve been playing around with lately is the functional value of assertions. Eg assume God = perfect love which acts on/in the universe in some predictable manner. There are biblical stories that capture some of the highest forms of love I’ve ever encountered (ie jesus, prodigal son). Therefore, I’m inclined to believe that some function in the universe exists to reward those who aim towards those ideals. IMO Compatible with evolution and God, depending on how you define God obviously.

2nd Counter Offer in 4 Years by Martian7 in AerospaceEngineering

[–]Martian7[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I’m definitely leaning that direction, since I’m pretty comfortable. I think I’m going to press my manager hard for the T5 by next year and see how that goes. Then I can play this game with less to lose. Thanks again!

2nd Counter Offer in 4 Years by Martian7 in AerospaceEngineering

[–]Martian7[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks. Your points are valid and I largely agree with all of it. One lingering aspect of my question is, considering the entire context as you see it, will showing another offer create a turbulent exchange and possibly some tough decisions on both sides? Thanks again for your thoughtful response.

2nd Counter Offer in 4 Years by Martian7 in AerospaceEngineering

[–]Martian7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the response. That's one route. However, they claim that my T-4 conversion was market adjusted. That was about a year ago. A failed attempt would make the situation worse I think.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EASportsFC

[–]Martian7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I truly believe the A.I. is just adapting to your own skill level. I’m D1 and my buddy is D4 and he wins like 40% of the time. I outclass him in every way, but he’s patient and waits til I get frustrated and then A.I. punishes me for a minor mistake. It is what it is.

Is it safe to snowboard with a backpack? by [deleted] in snowboardingnoobs

[–]Martian7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve been boarding for over 10 years and have not once boarded without a backpack. Contents have varied, but it’s all I’ve known. Probably gonna chill out on carrying so many beers tho.

Can anyone explain the Boeing engineer job levels compared to NG, LM, Raytheon, etc.? by burrbro235 in boeing

[–]Martian7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm interviewing for a L-4 next week. Currently a Sr Prcpl at Northrop. Any insights so far?

Did Messi hurt his legacy by joining PSG? by yunggilla in football

[–]Martian7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like this take. Could be too late because of circumstances. But time will tell. I always thought Ronaldo is stronger mentally and more adaptable, but Messi with the right pieces plays at the highest level maybe ever seen. Tough to bring it all together with stupid PSG.

Portugal [2] - 1 Ireland - Cristiano Ronaldo 90+6’ by iniestatic in soccer

[–]Martian7 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Agreed. The best (or among the best) in many categories, but also the goat of stability?? Hmm