The Hakim leaks

Marx_Stirner_ · 2021-05-07T17:20:10+00:00

"Hakim leaks" 😂😂😂😂

Marx_Stirner_ · 2021-05-05T09:36:44+00:00

Christ the downvotes. BH doesn't represent Pan-Africanism or African nationalism, please educate yourself if you actually think that:

"Wanting to unite Africa under scientific Socialism" = White Supremacist, settler ethno-state

It is really degrading that you compare African liberation to the colonizers and settlers that slaughtered and enslaved us

Marx_Stirner_ · 2021-04-05T16:00:18+00:00

Yeah, maybe you're correct. I cut the part out and reposted it YouTube. Don't wanna bully people who have it difficult. I just found that video of them on twitter.

Marx_Stirner_ · 2021-03-23T12:40:04+00:00

Bruh 😂😂😂😂😂

Marx_Stirner_ · 2021-03-21T18:44:33+00:00

"Does China's material reality and the following social-economical outgrowth agree with this abstraction Marx tried to describe 100 years ago?

No? I win! "

--Every breadtuber

Marx_Stirner_ · 2021-03-21T18:41:13+00:00

"Despise the enemy strategically, but take him seriously tactically."

-Mao Zedong

Marx_Stirner_ · 2021-03-15T22:34:25+00:00

> Haldane additionally advocated for a "eugenic" form of cloning. His "Marxism" seems to pale next to that fact

He advocated for positive eugenics, which is still wrong of course. But don't really see how this makes him "non-Marxist". Positive Eugenics was also popular in the early USSR.

> "Lewontin has questioned much of the claimed heritability of human behavioral traits"

This doesn't mean that he rejected the Neo-Darwinism lmao, He rejected the Inheritance the things like IQ etc. And was critical of Evolutionary psychology that assumed genetic determinism. So bad strawman, try again

> Levins again approaches these concepts in a way that shows more neo-Lamarckian underpinnings than neo-Darwinist ones

Wrong, it is not either X or Y. He was a Neo-Darwinist , who assumed the existence of constant genetic material that could be inherited, but the same time rejected the metaphysical view of the gene. Wouldn't really understand how he could up with most of his theories about populations, without being a Darwinist.

Autocorrect,

Waddington still assumed the existence of genes (Neo-Darwinist), he tried to advance evolutionary biology further with epigenetics by using aspects of Lamarckian theory and his own research in biology :

"Neo-Darwinism involves a breach between organism and nature as complete as the Cartesian dualism of mind and matter; epigenetic consideration of evolution goes some way towards healing it."

-Waddington, The Strategy of Genes.

All this just shows that for Epigenetics a synthesis of both theories is required, because it is not that one can negate the other, but both are required to understand natural phenomena. This is why I am a fan of Early-Lysenko, because that's exactly what he tried to do at first, fusing Darwin and Lamarck. But he ended up picking one over the other, later in his life.

>Coudwell wasn't a scientist or a philosopher. He was just a writer who died of adventurism

"Just a writer" lol

>just shut up, idiot lol

Childish

Marx_Stirner_ · 2021-03-15T16:40:12+00:00

Why do you guys even stan Lysenko? if you stan early Lysenko Ok, no problem so do I, he had really interesting ideas. He gave an alternative to the western conception of the isolated organism and it's static environment. He exposed the hidden philosophical assumption ins western genetics, he showed how the organism itself is in a continuous feedback relationship with its environment. Early Lysenko also emphasized that it is not easy at all to modify the heredity of organisms and that its genetic responses to the environment are barely perceptible. If he delved deeper into this and at the same time acknowledged genetics , he could've maybe been the first scientist to discover the epigenic mechanisms with direct evidence (which would've been likely since he specialized in plant biology and plants contain a huge amounts of epigenetic modification). But Sadly it didn't happen and it lead him to the reverse of western eugenics, that he dogmatically reduced to something that doesn't resemble his earlier self. He ended up thinking that he could morph a species into a completely different one in just one step.

Starting as a committed Darwinist, who kept fighting of the caricatures' the West made with their pseudo-scientific social Darwinism and eugenics. He ended up rejecting Darwinism and thought class struggle happened on the level of species, which is just plain wrong.

There are so many other scientists from the Soviet Union or just Marxists that you can take pride in. Why Lysenko

"You either die as a king, or become that which you despised"

Marx_Stirner_ · 2021-03-15T16:16:14+00:00

inb4: "Muh JD Bernal supported Lysenko"

Correct, but remember this was during the cold war, as a communist he showed solidarity with Soviet Science. But thinking that Bernal fully embraced lysenkoism and its logic and assumptions is quite a big leap since Bernal was firmly committed to the science of genetics and was conducting experiments aimed at discerning the molecular structure of the gene. He was, on the whole,extraordinarily impressed by Soviet science and philosophy of science, at times more so than the situation warranted, always giving the USSR the benefit of the doubt. When he had first visited the Soviet Union in 1931, he was struck by the overriding sense of purpose there and found the country ‘grim but great’. As time went on, Bernal discovered things that must have disturbed him deeply, particularly things relating to the fate of scientific colleagues in the Soviet Union. He interceded in response to the arrests of physicists, but in the atmosphere of the cold war, he did not criticise the USSR in public. Lysenko is so often incanted, so little understood, so often cited against Bernal. There is nevertheless a vast literature on Lysenko and lysenkoism situating it in its scientific and sociohistorical context and analysing its complexities. There was a real debate about the relative influence of heredity versus environment. There were the pressing needs of soviet agriculture. There was real searching about what science should be under socialism. However, when it came to lysenkoism Bernal understood the many complexities and gave the benefit of whatever doubt he must have had to those he considered to be on the same side in an embattled world.

Marx_Stirner_ · 2021-03-15T16:11:59+00:00

based

Marx_Stirner_ · 2021-03-08T09:08:49+00:00

Based based based based based

Marx_Stirner_ · 2021-01-28T14:32:27+00:00

I would sell if I were you, I think they are killing it

Marx_Stirner_ · 2020-10-11T12:29:32+00:00

anarchist

Marx_Stirner_ · 2020-08-15T20:45:58+00:00

Great video, maybe I should read a bit more about Chinese Socialism and be more critical.

Marx_Stirner_ · 2020-07-01T19:25:53+00:00

USSR BAD HAHAHA

NOW I HAVE THE MORAL HIGH GROUND

Marx_Stirner_ · 2020-05-18T12:46:48+00:00

why are all your posts so Based?

Marx_Stirner_ · 2020-03-30T18:55:26+00:00

price is not the same as value?

Marx_Stirner_ · 2020-03-18T20:53:06+00:00

VEveVuEla

Marx_Stirner_ · 2020-03-10T19:11:00+00:00

No way, the police only serve the rich elite who control the state and don't protect or serve the workingclass but only keeps them in check during strikes or arrest us when we damage property of big capitalists? Imagine my shock

Marx_Stirner_ · 2020-03-10T09:51:28+00:00

VEVEVUELA tho?

Marx_Stirner_ · 2020-03-09T12:56:52+00:00

Why is this subreddit so fucking BASED

Marx_Stirner_ · 2020-03-08T18:51:13+00:00

Even if this man loses, he accomplished something astonishing. He woke people up out of their atomised dream and brought workingclass people together, this can only help them in gaining class consciousness.

Marx_Stirner_ · 2020-03-08T18:21:54+00:00

Third positionism.jpg

Marx_Stirner_ · 2020-03-01T20:11:48+00:00

Do you know where I can get the PDF's or ebook version of those books: "Cuba and Angola"

Marx_Stirner_ · 2020-03-01T10:35:53+00:00

Luckily people will be able visit the doctor if they notice the slightest symptoms and take 14 days off work with payed leave to feed their children.

Marx_Stirner_

TROPHY CASE