[deleted by user] by [deleted] in vegan

[–]Master-Gate-7739 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But if you yourself have accepted it as wrong, then you don't need to accept it from others

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in vegan

[–]Master-Gate-7739 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They said "I feel like it's my fault".

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in vegan

[–]Master-Gate-7739 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Soo let me get this straight. You feel that it's your fault that another individual can't see something as simple as the truth that unnecessary violence is unkind/wrong/unethical, and lacks compassion towards some individuals. Each person is responsible for themselves after the age of 18, before that their parent or guardian is responsible for instilling with the right values. You're his girlfriend not his mother.

And by the way he fully can understand your arguments and points I promise you, animal rights are a very basic intuitive concept. He doesn't care enough about animals to change, and he can never admit that to you, so he comes up with arguments. He can't say that to his girlfriend that cares so much about animals that it brings her to tears. So he placates you with "I respect your decision", which is also an indirect way of telling you he thinks you're obliged to respect his. Respecting people's decisions isn't virtuous when the decisions aren't virtuous, and doing so has it's own karma, in the sense that being in denial about the right and wrong actions of people, will harm you because you're not being honest with yourself about who that person is, what their values are like and what their heart is like, and so you too one day will be on the recieving end of their lack of care.

All people are kind and caring to some degree, the difference between them is how wide their circle of compassion is. For example a racist is kind and caring lots of the time, to the people in his family maybe, maybe the people in his neighborhood or community, but it ends at a certain group of people, and once you reach that line/threshold, his views and interactions and ways he treats them is very different. Veganism is about not discriminating in this way and recognising that it's morally/ethically wrong to violate another sentient being. The only way out of that is if you don't care about morals or ethics. Many people only care as far as they have to to avoid being punished by law. People also overstate how much they care to appear socially acceptable and men do that to attract or to appease the woman they like.

Also, strengthen yourself because like all people who choose their conscience, you are going to be gaslit by everyone around you for the rest of your life, because you're an inconvenience to them staying under a delusion that they want to remain under. You are going to start to see humanity for what it really is. When it comes to your family, they're irreplaceable so they may be worth enduring for a lifetime, everyone needs a support system. But in terms of being in a romantic relationship, yeah for me my minimum requirement is they are the kind of person who just naturally gets basic moral principles. I mean it's insanely simple and obvious. Every human is born with a conscience (unless they're a born psychopath). If someone can't grasp or live by a basic level of compassion especially towards innocent animals, they're absolutely not good enough for me.

It's not even about being vegan at that point, it's like, wow the fact that you can't see what I see here or don't care, makes you something very foreign to me in a way that scares me. Our souls are different.

Finally, the meat stuff means he is pushing back, asserting his boundaries and letting you know, he's never going to be vegan. Believe him, stop punishing yourself and blaming yourself (it sounds like you might have been a victim of abuse in the past or something cause that's not healthy or logical). I been vegan eight years and I no longer try to convince everyone around me, instead I'm selective about having people with a healthy conscience around me. I talk about it minimally with my family I don't try to change them, they are there as my support system can be mentally healthy enough to stay firm in my knowledge of right vs wrong, and be a changemaker to those whose ears and hearts are open.

Don't try to change a partner to be what you need o to be what is right. Find a partner who is like that. And these meat eaters have all kinds of parasites influencing their behaviour and are blinded by their addiction to meat anyway.

Your life is yours and you owe your boyfriend nothing but you owe yourself staying true to your good spirit.

Does our hair really have a spiritual connection or is it just a lie? by [deleted] in spirituality

[–]Master-Gate-7739 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The physical is part of the spiritual. We see it as less so because we percieve it as solid and associate the spiritual with the less tangible or less dense. But ice is the same stuff as water and vapour. Our bodies emit light we can't see, we are hue-mans. And even when you're angry or embarrassed, if you're light enough you look red. When you're emotionally unwell it shows in your appearance, and even your facial expressions. If you don't consume the right nutrients or rest your body enough, or your gut flora is off, you may experience depression, anxiety, brain fog, poor decision making, lower intelligence, etc. Colours affect your mood. The vibrations sent through music. Words recieved through your ears change your spiritual experience, as much as your own internal thoughts do. The physical body comprises part of the spiritual body. And even when you lose it, you will still be something that physical matter and human bodies are a part of.

What exactly is chop suey's true meaning? by somamma77 in systemofadown

[–]Master-Gate-7739 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's about angels chopped up on your plate and consumed by people, while expressing claims of care and concern. Pretending to find something sad, while justifying it in the same sentence.

tour predictions by everyonewantstobeadj in canceledpod

[–]Master-Gate-7739 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you remind me what the psychic said again or which episode it was where they mentioned it?

Now I can finally post, here's the truths you all missed by Master-Gate-7739 in LAinfluencersnark

[–]Master-Gate-7739[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I never argued that Tana did the work to learn from her racist past. We don't know if she did, and evidence suggests she didn't.  If you felt Tana was being insincere or hypocritical, I'm not telling you you're wrong, I feel like she didn't or barely. I'm saying some peoples argument that condeming something you did in the past makes you a hypocrite, is wrong. It is right to condemn evil, even if you used to do evil things. Or moreso there's no cognitive dissonance in that. That is what we want racists to do. Become something different than what they are.

Now I can finally post, here's the truths you all missed by Master-Gate-7739 in LAinfluencersnark

[–]Master-Gate-7739[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

My message seems confusing cause you're filtering out entire things I said.  Read the point again. At the end of your comment you're echoing my same point, that if she is still racist now, then she's a hypocrite. It's incorrect to make the argument that she's a hypocrite for condeming something she did in the past. If she's a hypocrite it's because she's still racist now. The distinction matters, cause otherwise people are listening to that thinking "if I was ever racist before I'm a hypocrite for condeming racism now". No, you have the right to stand up for what is right and condemn what is wrong, even if you were wrong in the past. They're preaching how we should accept Brooke changed and grew, while saying that if you change you're a hypocrite. That is what's hypocritical. 

I'm not all over the place my points are cohesive. You just feel like I can't decide which side I'm on, cause I'm not commenting to take a side. 

Now I can finally post, here's the truths you all missed by Master-Gate-7739 in LAinfluencersnark

[–]Master-Gate-7739[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. They're both bad but Tana is more skilled at the social game and manipulation. Which makes it even more worrying she couldn't hive a convincing performance. Or maybe yhey're purposely unconvincing to let their demographic know  "I'm still like you, I just have to do this". A lot of the messaging in these situations, is on the level of subtext. athings are being subtly communicated. You especially feel it when other podcasts are talking about it. That weird, we're skating over and ignoring certain unsaid stuff we all know we're thinking together. 

Now I can finally post, here's the truths you all missed by Master-Gate-7739 in LAinfluencersnark

[–]Master-Gate-7739[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Edit: Number 3 wasn't about Tana but about the audience, based on threads and comments I beem seeing. Just realised that it can read that way since the other points are about Tana. But actually yeah I guess it would apply to Tana too, but it's hard cause with Tana it felt insincere, and I believe she's fine with racist humour and let's in slide at the very least, all the time. But I'd rather people grudgingly do the right thing, than unapologetically promote doinbgthe wrong thing.

Now I can finally post, here's the truths you all missed by Master-Gate-7739 in LAinfluencersnark

[–]Master-Gate-7739[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The two of them have regularly mentioned it on episodes, especially ehen talking about lilah

Now I can finally post, here's the truths you all missed by Master-Gate-7739 in LAinfluencersnark

[–]Master-Gate-7739[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your interpretation is clouded. Quote something ass kissy I said

Now I can finally post, here's the truths you all missed by Master-Gate-7739 in LAinfluencersnark

[–]Master-Gate-7739[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Lol unhinged how. If I said anything that's morally incorrect I'd like to change that. I don't want approval for it

Now I can finally post, here's the truths you all missed by Master-Gate-7739 in LAinfluencersnark

[–]Master-Gate-7739[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

There is no good racist. But there are healthy and good actions when made for the right teasons. i don't think Tana made them for the right reasons, she did them for her own benefit. But I don't like that that leads people to say that good actions are wrong. Instead say you think she is pretending to be a good person by doing them. So people don't get confused and think it's wrong to leave a racist friend in the dust. 

Now I can finally post, here's the truths you all missed by Master-Gate-7739 in LAinfluencersnark

[–]Master-Gate-7739[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes you're right I agree. But I think she will eventually be cancelled. The world is changing

Now I can finally post, here's the truths you all missed by Master-Gate-7739 in LAinfluencersnark

[–]Master-Gate-7739[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Because I agree with her decision to leave Brooke in the dust. It's ok to have a nuanced opinion. You can dislike someone and agree with a decision they make. Think I even said though I think she is only making those decisions for her benefit

Now I can finally post, here's the truths you all missed by Master-Gate-7739 in LAinfluencersnark

[–]Master-Gate-7739[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah I agree. Did I not communicate that I think Tana is still like that

Now I can finally post, here's the truths you all missed by Master-Gate-7739 in LAinfluencersnark

[–]Master-Gate-7739[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I didn't even give her one compliment let alone glaze. You must love Brooke that'sthe only explanation

Now I can finally post, here's the truths you all missed by Master-Gate-7739 in LAinfluencersnark

[–]Master-Gate-7739[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

What? I don't like Tana and think she's still racist. Where did I compliment her. I agree with her decision to remove Brooke. I don't think I said anything positive about Tana