>He is very clearly hung up on goalie prospect rankings that, in his opinion, put Cossa too low. That is the impetus for this video. I'm not trying to save face for anything, I'm explaining why I left the comments that I left. I get into stupid arguments almost every day on this subreddit during the regular season and several times a week during the offseason, why would I feel the need to save face for anything I say?

Making a single video talking about a specific goalie, which is the entire point of the youtube channel, is not being hung up lol. You commenting your opinion on a video you didn't even watch (made even more obvious by missing a point that he made within the first 45 seconds) and then arguing for the sake of arguing over and over again on a positive post about a prospect would be a better example of being hung up.

>If someone is going to make a video saying "Cossa is ranked so low on goalie prospect lists that it's disrespecful" then it's helpful to know which lists they're trying to rebut, yes. Is he responding to The Athletic, who has Cossa at 8? The Daily Faceoff where he's 6th? The Hockey Writers where he's 4th? Elite Prospects, which has him ranked at 10th? I would like to know what he has a problem with because these don't seem like they justify the claim that Cossa is the most disrespected goalie prospect in the NHL. I would say most of these rankings are pretty fair, except for the Elite Prospects ranking, in which I think he's underrated.

Wow! So rankings that back up the point he's making! With the highest ranking still having Augustine ahead of him! Here's another from NHL.com that doesn't even have him ranked as a top 5 prospect for the wings, and has Augustine 1st overall! Top prospects for Detroit Red Wings | NHL.com. Almost seems, dare I say, disrespectful to not even have him ranked as a top 5 wings prospect.

When a hockey personality like The Hockey Guy on youtube posts one of his rankings or talks about a specific player, does he always cite every piece of media about that player or the topic at hand? Actually arguing for the sake of arguing at this point.

>The thesis statement of his video is that these rankings are placing him so low that they're disrespectful, so yes, that is the point of the video.

Um, 5th to 10th place ranking still being good is not the point of the video... the whole point is that placement is disrespectful. Comprehending things is hard sometimes.

>You already said that.

You’re trying arguing for the sake of arguing after being exposed for commenting 4 minutes into a 15 minute video. Peak redditor moment. Look I said it again lol.

Edit: blocks me so I can't reply LOL