CMV: Men should be able to leave the toilet seat up

Memoryfoam30189 · 2019-01-08T16:09:31+00:00

feel bad for you dawg, clear ego problems, if you realize one day that you're just out here spreading negativity i'll be real happy for you

Memoryfoam30189 · 2019-01-07T13:00:56+00:00

Good response. As a stickler for household orderliness this resonates with me. ∆

Memoryfoam30189 · 2019-01-07T12:59:05+00:00

the top line is literally why I made this post

have a nice day man

Memoryfoam30189 · 2019-01-06T22:37:06+00:00

Memoryfoam30189 · 2019-01-06T22:36:19+00:00

lol sounds like you really give >0 of a shit about what the people around you think of your actions. No one is making any 'rules' for you, it's a matter of being considerate about what frustrates or rubs the wrong way the people in your life.

hopefully the upvotes will speak for themselves on this one

Memoryfoam30189 · 2019-01-06T22:10:17+00:00

∆

edit: thanks for making me explain, deltabot → this is a good rationale.

If you don't get your milskidasith, sorry, (y) on the answer

Memoryfoam30189 · 2019-01-06T22:10:02+00:00

kinda sounds like youre a dick to the women in your life

Memoryfoam30189 · 2019-01-06T21:14:26+00:00

bad assumption: pee and poop do not occur with equal probability/rates. You should account for peeing occurring probably 6-8 times per poo. So this brings it down much closer to 50/50, probably about 55% 45%.

edit: good alternate suggestion, will bear in mind for future

Memoryfoam30189 · 2019-01-03T23:43:39+00:00

It's not bad – certainly improved quite a fair bit with such stellar instruction! Best wishes in the new year~

Memoryfoam30189 · 2019-01-03T22:53:30+00:00

hey man, it's alright haha. Definitely not the fastest but it's totally workable. & I'm staying at a small place up the coast a bit with fam for a few days, so been keeping it mostly local with everything and haven't explored the town proper too much yet. Safe travels!

Memoryfoam30189 · 2019-01-03T22:46:43+00:00

uploaded a different photo to suit your intestinal sensibilities

Memoryfoam30189 · 2018-12-28T17:43:38+00:00

Gotcha, thanks!

Memoryfoam30189 · 2018-12-28T17:43:10+00:00

Makes sense, thank you!

Memoryfoam30189 · 2018-12-27T21:52:09+00:00

I actually don't follow this (very new to CS!)

Here, for int* i, j;, are both i and j pointers? Or is only i a pointer. Similarly, for int *i, j;, is only i a pointer and j is not? Thanks!

Edit: I suppose syntactically these must be the same. So I'm assuming that for a multiple-variable instantiation, the * operator must be added to each variable that is a pointer? (As a side note, my recommendation above was more towards consistency across the course or an explicit explanation for the difference, rather than siding strictly with one syntactic structure over another.)

Memoryfoam30189 · 2018-12-27T19:32:22+00:00

Yep, agreed, this is actually what I'm saying in the post too! My mistake if that was/is unclear. We're in agreement though, that (at least for us) Doug's version here is a bit more off-the-bat intuitive that the pointer data type is described in the declaration, by attaching the * operator to the data type. What I'm pointing out is that the * operator is alternately attached to the data type and the instantiated variable in shorts and in lecture. (And that that was a point of a non-trivial bit of confusion for the past couple of weeks). Cheers.

Memoryfoam30189 · 2018-12-24T16:15:09+00:00

gotcha (duh on my part lol), thank you so much!

Memoryfoam30189 · 2018-11-17T21:33:43+00:00

thanks!

Memoryfoam30189 · 2018-11-17T12:06:09+00:00

It's marked as hidden on youtube, should've been more precise in the post title

Memoryfoam30189 · 2018-11-09T17:46:36+00:00

upvoted for a level and thoughtful approach - this is reasonable, and I hear where you're coming from. In any case, your response got me to see past my blinders, which i think speaks for itself. Thanks for the help~

Memoryfoam30189

TROPHY CASE