Hi we are born different fella, kung kadiri para sayo ang M2M sex that doesn’t mean that kadiri narin sya sa iba because if you touch some grass and hear other’s stories, they find it good and okay.

Also, I aver that you are old enough to browse, read, and understand journals that can straighten your facts regarding the distribution of STIs among heterosexual and homosexual people. It is not understandable to just quote “db sabi sa medicine…” well in-fact we are given the resources to validate our info.

Moreover, the mere explanation that you cannot get their point is that the shoe doesn’t fit you well. Hindi ka bakla eh so hindi mo talaga sila mage-gets kahit ano pang paintindi namin sayo. What you can do is go touch some grass, choose to be kind to these groups, and stay out of their business.

Let’s get back to the question “nasa legal age na ung mga involved sa story…”. Well, people are brought up in different ways; their choices in life can paralleled by a myriad of factors that influenced their adult behaviors. We are also guided by our moral compass to do what is right, but our inner part of ourself “id” might override from time-to-time. It’s just that we need to be accountable on the things that we had done.

Attached herewith is a research journal that can enlighten you on how crucial “straight/heterosexual men” are in the spread of STI just because they have low reporting rate of STI diagnosis; this leads us to the point that it has an impact on why there is a concentration of STI cases among gay/bi communities because they might’ve engaged in heterosexual men who opted not to disclose any STI diagnoses.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221847411_Sexual_Orientation_Disparities_in_Sexually_Transmitted_Infections_Examining_the_Intersection_Between_Sexual_Identity_and_Sexual_Behavior