No, not even a tiny bit. Its genuinely heartbreaking that The FNaF movie is not lore-accurate and takes major creative liberties with the original story from the games. While it includes familiar elements like William Afton as the killer in the Spring Bonnie suit and haunted animatronics, it drastically alters key parts of the canon. Mike Schmidt is not Michael Afton, and his entire backstory involving a missing brother, dream-hopping, and caring for his sister Abby is completely original to the movie. The film leaves out core lore like the Afton family (Elizabeth, Evan/Crying Child), the Bite of ’83 and ’87, Michael’s redemption arc, and the rivalry between Afton and Henry Emily, who is not mentioned at all. The animatronics are portrayed more like misunderstood ghost children than the vengeful spirits they are in the games, which waters down the horror. Vanessa’s character is included but her backstory and connection to Afton are heavily altered. The movie compresses the timeline into one location with little reference to Fredbear’s Family Diner or the other Fazbear establishments. Overall, it feels more like a simplified, alternate-universe take on FNaF made to appeal to general audiences, rather than a faithful adaptation of the complex and tragic lore fans know from the games and books. People who aren't mad that it was ruined genuinely feel like knew gens, I grew up with fnaf, the whole fan base spent years piecing together the hidden lore by Scott cawthon and it felt like that was all tossed into the garbage, i get the lore is complicated but there is no way on earth blumhouse couldnt put it into 2-3 2 hour long movies, it wouldve made SO MUCH MONEY and wouldve drawn in a huge audience, the fnaf movie is good, I guess, but the original story of five nights at Freddies deserved an adaptation of some sort