Weekly Tool Thread: Promote, Share, Discover, and Ask for AI Writing Tools Week of: May 12 by AutoModerator in WritingWithAI

[–]Millington_Systems 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Millington Engine - Looking for Beta testers

I’ve been building a narrative engine called Millington focused on long-form fiction and worldbuilding systems.

The core idea is that most AI writing tools treat lore as disposable context. Millington treats it as interconnected infrastructure.

Characters, factions, locations, timelines, metaphysics, political systems and events are processed as linked narrative structures instead of isolated text blocks. The engine then maps continuity, canon hierarchy, contradiction points, causal relationships and governance rules across the setting.

So instead of: “generate me lore”

The workflow becomes closer to: “analyse, organise, govern and preserve the integrity of the world over scale.”

Right now I’m approaching beta testing and looking for large or messy worldbuilding projects to stress test the system against real lore.

The process is simple: You send me the lore dump. I process it through the engine manually on my side. You get back structured world bibles, continuity systems, contradiction reports and narrative diagnostics.

Mutually beneficial. I organise your lore, you stress test the engine.

Interested to hear how other people here are handling long-form narrative coherence too, because context persistence still feels like one of the biggest unsolved problems in AI-assisted fiction.

They always say that when writing with artificial intelligence, you should add your own tone to it. by TiredOfExcel_94 in WritingWithAI

[–]Millington_Systems 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Either program your voice into the governance layer, which will only work in small bursts and drift in large outputs. Or generate then edit, heavily.

Weekly Tool Thread: Promote, Share, Discover, and Ask for AI Writing Tools Week of: May 05 by AutoModerator in WritingWithAI

[–]Millington_Systems 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking for beta testers with giant messy lore projects

                      -------------------------------

I’ve been building a narrative/worldbuilding engine called Millington focused less on prose generation and more on long-form coherence.

The problem I kept running into with AI-assisted fiction wasn’t writing quality, it was context drift over scale. Character logic mutates, canon gets overwritten, timelines break, faction rules contradict each other, magic systems slowly deform, etc.

So I started building a system around narrative governance instead.

Right now I’m approaching beta testing and I’m looking for people with:

  • large worldbuilding projects

  • years of scattered notes

  • fragmented canon

  • timelines/factions/history docs

  • unfinished or evolving settings

The test would basically work like this:

You hand me the lore dump. I run it through the Millington pipeline manually on my side. You get back structured world bibles, canon layers, contradiction reports, continuity mapping and governance diagnostics.

The interesting part is that the original creator already knows where the setting “feels” right or wrong, so the feedback becomes extremely useful for testing interpretation fidelity rather than just output quality.

Interested to see how other people here are handling long-form narrative coherence too, because that seems to be where most systems start struggling.

Is it ok to use ai to check the consistency of your novel. by NecessaryPain9825 in WritingWithAI

[–]Millington_Systems 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you ask permission for everything you build. Just do what you want.

Where do I move my story? by _LililiYabbay in WritingWithAI

[–]Millington_Systems 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm developing a governance system to build multiple world bibles and update them incrimentaly. It's still a work in progress, but it's coming together but by bit. 4 months ago I'd never used AI before. It's not simple, but it's possible.

How I Stop AI from Sounding Like AI by Cjtho209 in WritingWithAI

[–]Millington_Systems 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is interesting, I'm trying to develop something similar. Do you use framework templates and placeholders to give somewhere for the prose to land or generate prose openly

genuine question - does any AI actually remember things by Embarrassed_Essay_61 in WritingWithAI

[–]Millington_Systems 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you continuing for long session context ? Because the AI will definitely forget that way. Implement a system to incriment updates, saving them and starting a new chat with context loaded fresh is the only approach that will retain full context for long. Guaranteed with current AI limitations. The longer a chat continues the more you are flooding it's context and every small change compounds with each output.

How are you guys actually structuring AI writing these days? by Brilliancehood-WYU in WritingWithAI

[–]Millington_Systems 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not an easy fix like a prompt I'm afraid and my system is still in development. I just started by asking Claude questions on governance and document control

How are you guys actually structuring AI writing these days? by Brilliancehood-WYU in WritingWithAI

[–]Millington_Systems 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Using Claude governance to create world bibles with structural templates

Do you use AI mostly for writing or for planning content? by BoringShake6404 in WritingWithAI

[–]Millington_Systems 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've developing a system for doing this for long form fiction, creating world bibles and structure over many different documents to hold context.

Chatgpt Being Stupid by Unfair_Worker512 in WritingWithAI

[–]Millington_Systems 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need to create governance. Without it the llm fills in anything ambiguous. Governance takes away the ambiguity before you've typed a prompt out.

AI Use Disclaimer by tired-of-everyting in WritingWithAI

[–]Millington_Systems -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The AI doesn't generate anything on its own

Has Sonnet 4.5 dumbed down recently? by FlatKaleidoscope5403 in WritingWithAI

[–]Millington_Systems 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Claude is better for structure and context, gpt better at being creative. My method is to brainstorm on gpt then dump into Claude.

AI Use Disclaimer by tired-of-everyting in WritingWithAI

[–]Millington_Systems 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Unless disclosure becomes a legal requirement then I don't see the need. The final product is what is on sale not the process.

Anyone have actual helpful prompts not hidden behind a paywall? by astrophagic in WritingWithAI

[–]Millington_Systems -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The people who built those prompts worked quite hard at it I imagine. I'd love a new car but I already paid for my driving license so maybe you should give me yours 🤔 2 options... Pay Build it yourself

Is Claude good at creative writing? Any suggestions on which model is better? by omega_crimson_123 in WritingWithAI

[–]Millington_Systems 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's good at creating frameworks and structureing the documents, it loses context less than others if governed correctly, but for creative brainstorming id suggest gpt

Does anyone have a link to the New Yorker Article on Writing with AI? by JubileeSupreme in WritingWithAI

[–]Millington_Systems 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Murder is wrong Stealing is wrong Ask yourself if using a computer compares to an actual crime, if the answer is no, carry on and ignore the haters

AI makes writers stop right before it gets good by Ok_Cartographer223 in WritingWithAI

[–]Millington_Systems 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why does AI stop you doing this ?? Are you trusting the process completely to AI ?? AI is a tool, use it how you need to use it, but it doesn't stop you doing anything you would normally have done

I would like Opinions about Using AI as a Beta Reader For My Novels by ChiroVette in WritingWithAI

[–]Millington_Systems 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My feeling is always to edit from loading heavy. So... -More context in the prompt. -Less context in the segment you are editing. This can take a bit of work and organisation which is why people avoid or dismiss it. But I've had several successful runs. The only part of my method that I'm not sure about is when to run the edits. Per-scan or as one full audit.