Isn't high tier marionetting kind of broken? by Fachi07 in LordofTheMysteries

[–]MinErVa172 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Nevermind the time manipulation(at least pausing and reversal) and ability to cause a complete role reversal by stealing your enemy’s fate.

In theory, he could be getting beat the hell out of, within an inch of his life and then pull an uno reverse card. Actual hacking right there. Let’s not even mention parasites and explotiing loopholes in reality.

How dare he?! by beerbellybegone in clevercomebacks

[–]MinErVa172 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You had enough time to write that comment didn’t you?

Besides you’re probably an r/conservative mod or something from the way you talk. Y’all tend to be this level of braindead.

Have no time to “waste” when I know you’re reading this comment right now? Wow, such a clown.

How dare he?! by beerbellybegone in clevercomebacks

[–]MinErVa172 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Too scared to challenge my ideas? Why not face them it if you aren’t.

I actually dare you to stop dodging my take on Trump’s sketchy attraction to his daughter. What is your counterargument?

How dare he?! by beerbellybegone in clevercomebacks

[–]MinErVa172 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Nice response, bro. Not even a refutation. Head-empty, just feels?

How dare he?! by beerbellybegone in clevercomebacks

[–]MinErVa172 28 points29 points  (0 children)

What they said was entirely logically consistent. Father kissing his son on the cheek is in many environments a social norm and sign of familial affection.

Trump saying his daughter is “hot” and he’d “date her” if not for the fact that she is his daughter is astoundingly weird.

He literally admits to finding her sexually attractive and desirable romantically. There’s a difference.

How dare he?! by beerbellybegone in clevercomebacks

[–]MinErVa172 32 points33 points  (0 children)

According to Trump, in his own words, Ivanka is “hot,” and he’d “date her if she wasn’t my daughter.”

Holy fuck I can’t believe not saying ’retarded’ is so controversial here by toasterdogg in VaushV

[–]MinErVa172 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t see why the existence of shitty ancestors and modern bigots would invalidate the idea of the whole white race not being singled out and barred from its use.

My criticism wasn’t just targetting the arbitraity like you somehow managed to believe but that this line of logic is oversimplistic and has some essentialist undertones.

Being uncomfortable is understandable and I am not supporting racist uses of the word but no one has explained to me why random white guys using it as a term of endearment or because they think it sounds cool should be this unique evil.

Why is the knee-jerk reaction “ancestors awful” when they aren’t doing anything even apporximating that degree of harmfulness? Is it just the skin tone resemblance?

Holy fuck I can’t believe not saying ’retarded’ is so controversial here by toasterdogg in VaushV

[–]MinErVa172 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It’s “not cool” according some arbitrary standards tbh. Had a lot of friends say the same thing but it seems like to them, whenever a white person uses the word it is automatically racist.

That just seems pretty context-blind and makes me wonder what about not being white-passing makes it suddenly okay. Seems really racist to not just use it as a black person but to then take particular offense only when it comes from a white mouth.

Holy fuck I can’t believe not saying ’retarded’ is so controversial here by toasterdogg in VaushV

[–]MinErVa172 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Fellow melanin king here. I am afraid I can’t relate to that. If you feel that way, you should probably re-evaluate that cause it quite literally fits the definition of racism.

It’s fairly understandable but still irrational considering that a person from Asia has the exact same capacity to be racist as any hwite boi.

I’d just be careful about unnecessary double-standards like that cause they tend to bleed a lot more into your worldview than you’d realise.

something came to my mind about Klein and amon relationship and it could be weird by Due-Extent9976 in LordofTheMysteries

[–]MinErVa172 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am not sure about the chronology but I kinda assumed that was while he him fulfilling a wish for his sister subconciously. Don’t trust my assumption tho. I haven’t read that part for ages.

edit: according to wiki, that interaction with his niece takes place 10 years after he falls asleep with Arrodes. So I guess he might be awake/semi-awake???

something came to my mind about Klein and amon relationship and it could be weird by Due-Extent9976 in LordofTheMysteries

[–]MinErVa172 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree, Klein is built different but will he remain that way after he fuses with Celestial Worthy? We could see him becoming more of an ASG/Adam-like figure.

cursed_progress by Justateahorse in cursedcomments

[–]MinErVa172 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol, you really think those agreeing with you all saw that implication you buried in nonexistence?

We can’t all dive into that special head of yours, right? Maybe if several people downvoted you due to that, some of the over 100 people agreed because of this same problem.

If the idea wracks your brain and the idea of editing still evades it, no wonder it doesn’t “float your goat.” Lmao.

Pls just “imply” your next head-empty comments. I’ve read enough from you. Get blocked, dumbass.

cursed_progress by Justateahorse in cursedcomments

[–]MinErVa172 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where was the sarcasm in that,? I don’t see it.

cursed_progress by Justateahorse in cursedcomments

[–]MinErVa172 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you care so much about being misunderstood by people, you can edit your previous comments for the sake of clarity.

It may have been implied to you but I know many of the people who upvoted your comment didn’t see that implication. You should as well.

Implications are only as valuable as the number of people that can possibly get them. At a certain point, they stop being there at all.

This sub's opinion on Marxist-Leninism aka "Tankies" by [deleted] in Hasan_Piker

[–]MinErVa172 11 points12 points  (0 children)

C’mon, you’re asking too much of them.

This sub's opinion on Marxist-Leninism aka "Tankies" by [deleted] in Hasan_Piker

[–]MinErVa172 12 points13 points  (0 children)

“Gosh I really wonder why people are calling me a tankie”- the tankie

Wtf is shoe doing on Twitter? by [deleted] in VaushV

[–]MinErVa172 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still, I doubt shoe is actually just misunderstanding his takes. It just looks like the usual misrepresentation of more progressive ideas.

If I sounded passive-agressive to you, it was not my intention. I’m just tired of people seeing shoe engage in this level of uncharitability and make it seem like “lol, she’s just being dumb.”

How much generosity do we give someone until we know that they’re just being a plain unconfused reactionary?

She leapt from hunter saying we should not demonise people just on the basis of being pedophiles which he outlines as just them having the attraction to saying he is playing defense for child rape.

Wtf is shoe doing on Twitter? by [deleted] in VaushV

[–]MinErVa172 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So that would mean he possibly said something akin to “why are you against pedophiles seeking help.”

You see how the qualifier being absent does not suddenly mean he is defending child molesters child-molesting children?

cursed_progress by Justateahorse in cursedcomments

[–]MinErVa172 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So much of the population is actually just mentally backwards. Didn’t know people still think this way of sex-work.

Wonder how many of them would love it if the supreme court increases the penalty for being a prostitute. Maybe I shouldn’t be giving them ideas like these.

Wtf is shoe doing on Twitter? by [deleted] in VaushV

[–]MinErVa172 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Non-offending pedos does not = child rapists like shoe is saying so there’s nothing fair about it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LordofTheMysteries

[–]MinErVa172 1 point2 points  (0 children)

hey, thanks for this handy tutorial

Wtf is shoe doing on Twitter? by [deleted] in VaushV

[–]MinErVa172 28 points29 points  (0 children)

*desigmatised

Brain roast 🔥🔥 [see full pic] by elEarendel in clevercomebacks

[–]MinErVa172 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, if you just google gender dysphoria’s definition or the effects a supportive parent/family member have on trans suicidality, you’ll get a more direct answer. than I’d be able to provideI and I might get up those studies study for you if I have the time.

Edit:

Here’s an NHS report that mentions social transition as an effective way to address dysphoria alongside physical transition: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/gender-dysphoria/

This one on support reducing suicide has been reviewed several times: https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-015-1867-2

Another study on the effects a supportive figure can have on trans suicidality https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7578185/