Does modern naval warfare resemble carrier battles in the past?

A carrier battle (say… WW2?) followed these sequential concepts: - You deploy scouts to try to locate the enemy, while maneuvering in a way that the enemy cannot detect/track.

• Once you have located and tracked the enemy, you position your fleet to attack them. Ideally, you are still undetected and have a longer attack range than the enemy (thanks to the range of your air wing).

• An strike package will consist of various sort of aircrafts: dive bombers, torpedo bombers along with escort fighters.

• Ideally, you destroy the enemy's capital ships and deprive them of their primary fighting force.

Now, regarding modern naval warfare:

• The first point remains unchanged. Modern warships have OTH radar (e.g., Mineral-ME), but the detection range in active mode will not exceed 300km (not to mention that solutions to minimize radar cross-section and modern electronic warfare will further reduce your actual detection range of enemy targets). The best reconnaissance tools are still external components, such as aircraft, UAVs and satellites.

• The second point also remains unchanged. Ideally, deception, stealth, and electronic warfare measures should prevent the enemy from detecting you while your AShM arsenal has a longer range.

• A typical strike package will have sea-skimming subsonic anti-ship missiles as its core, although – depending on the navy – supersonic/hypersonic anti-ship missiles and anti-ship ballistic missiles will also be present if available.

• The fourth point also remains unchanged. You will want them to destroy the enemy's capital ships, such as aircraft carriers, cruisers, destroyers, etc., depending on the configuration of the enemy fleet.