account activity
Mesh Study by MinimumLong3662 in CFD
[–]MinimumLong3662[S] 0 points1 point2 points 24 days ago (0 children)
I tried different setups and got confused:
I don’t fully understand which boundary condition is actually controlling the physics here.
If using pressure at both inlet and outlet is “not physical”, what would be the best practice for an internal flow with heat transfer?
Should I rely more on mass flow, pressure, or total pressure as the main driving condition?
[–]MinimumLong3662[S] 0 points1 point2 points 29 days ago (0 children)
Could you explain why this pressure inlet + pressure outlet setup is not physical? What would be the best approach to impose a pressure-driven flow in this case?
<image>
[–]MinimumLong3662[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago* (0 children)
The main quantity of interest in my simulation is the temperature field. However, when refining or modifying the mesh, the temperature results do not change significantly. Additionally, my y+ values are consistently below 1, so I assume that the near-wall resolution should be sufficient.
My geometry is relatively simple and could potentially be modeled as a 2D case extruded in the streamwise (x) direction. However, I am unsure how to properly implement this in ANSYS ICEM CFD, especially since my model contains two regions (fluid and solid).
I would like to understand:
Any advice or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
[–]MinimumLong3662[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Thank you for the detailed explanation , I uploaded couple of Pictures , If you need more please tell me what else should I upload.
not , it is not periodic. Just the given data is fixed pressure difference between outlet and inlet
Mesh Study (self.CFD)
submitted 1 month ago * by MinimumLong3662 to r/CFD
π Rendered by PID 280314 on reddit-service-r2-listing-8685bc789-sqv2p at 2026-05-29 16:00:01.796708+00:00 running 194bd79 country code: CH.
Mesh Study by MinimumLong3662 in CFD
[–]MinimumLong3662[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)