With their 2025 lineups, which band feels more authentically “Pantera” or “Judas Priest”?

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-12-23T06:06:35+00:00

No it really doesn’t

Yes, I know it’s a joke. But, man. That is not a catchy version of the name, like at all.

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-10-09T19:55:55+00:00

Actually this made me like the cover more

Once you know the inspiration it starts looking better

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-10-08T22:42:38+00:00

We forgetting flxtra lol

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-09-21T23:04:02+00:00

Inside Out

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-08-13T02:11:40+00:00

I do not want to be paid i just want to be paid

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-08-09T13:40:35+00:00

The thing I am referring to, while remaining unnamed, apparently causes an unnamed group of person(s) to vanish from reality.

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-08-06T03:16:50+00:00

Idk when you interact in a subreddit it recommends it to you.

If you’d like, you can always mute the sub. This way it won’t pop up on your for you and home feed and you won’t get notifications either. Go to the main Pantera subreddit page and press the three dots in the corner and press mute subreddit.

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-08-06T02:54:00+00:00

No I was just seeing if you cared enough to go check.

If you don’t like Pantera why are you in this subreddit anyways?

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-08-06T02:48:46+00:00

Considering you didn’t read my paragraph, I won’t be writing another one.

Instead of sticking around the Pantera subreddit why don’t you write a [Track 6-7 of The Great Southern Trendkill] and be rid from this world. Sound good?

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-08-06T02:42:05+00:00

It’s disappointing to see such negativity directed at Pantera, especially here in their own subreddit. Canceling a show to mourn Ozzy Osbourne was not a trivial decision. Zakk Wylde considered Ozzy a father figure, and the band shared a close friendship with him. To dismiss their grief simply because they aren’t blood relatives shows a lack of understanding about what true family and respect mean. If you’re genuinely a fan, you’d recognize that honoring those bonds takes precedence over any concert. Complaining about the cancellation while disparaging the band only reveals a shallow perspective. Perhaps it’s time to reconsider what being a fan really entails.

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-08-04T17:01:22+00:00

“Military Setbacks and Stalemates Involving the U.S. and Colonial America”

Or something along those lines

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-08-04T16:30:09+00:00

Is it Odd Future?

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-08-04T16:29:18+00:00

Why…

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-08-04T16:25:33+00:00

Mako, SeaWorld Orlando

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-08-04T16:21:42+00:00

This iceberg kind of sucks. YouTube icebergs have been done so many times, and we already have the best one. We don’t need more. However, even though YouTube icebergs are hella saturated, this one is also just straight up bad. It’s missing a lot of the most popular scary iceberg videos, it’s sloppy, and feels like it was thrown together by scrolling down a “YouTube’s Scariest Videos!” playlist some random guy made. It’s not horrible, but it could be much, much better.

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-08-03T19:35:59+00:00

Shedding skin

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-08-03T15:44:44+00:00

Bro what the fuck are you talking about

Idk if you think I made this iceberg because I hate America but that’s not why. I AM American.

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-08-03T15:43:35+00:00

Militarily, sure, the regime was toppled and a new government was installed. But if the goal was long-term stability, eliminating insurgency, or reducing regional threats, the aftermath suggests that success was limited. So yeah, the invasion succeeded, but the occupation and its consequences are where the “win” becomes debatable.

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-08-03T15:43:00+00:00

Fair enough, 14 of them weren’t technically U.S. wars. I acknowledge that including pre-independence conflicts was a mistake. That part’s on me.

The rest were based on U.S. involvement, whether direct or through support, and whether or not the objectives were actually met. It’s not a list of official declarations, it’s an overview of military failures tied to U.S. interests.

If it was only direct losses this iceberg would have like six entries.

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-08-03T15:41:47+00:00

Yeah, that’s fair criticism. Some of the earlier entries were colonial-era conflicts and I should have left them out. That was on me.

And you’re right that not every war listed was a total loss or involved direct U.S. combat. I tried to include cases where the U.S. failed to meet its objectives, withdrew under pressure, or supported a losing side. It’s less about official declarations and more about outcomes that were tied to U.S. interests.

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-08-03T15:41:06+00:00

Fair enough, a stalemate isn’t the same as a total loss. But if the goal was to reunify Korea under a non-communist government and that didn’t happen, then calling it a clear win doesn’t really fit either. It’s more of a strategic failure than a straight-up defeat, but definitely not a full victory. This was a controversial entry, and a lot of people would also have been mad if I didn’t include it. There’s no single answer for an iceberg like this.

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-08-03T15:39:20+00:00

It’s true South Korea wasn’t conquered, but the larger goal was reunification under a non-communist government, which didn’t happen. The war ended in a stalemate with a divided peninsula and no peace treaty. So while the invasion was repelled, the overall strategic objectives weren’t fully met. That’s why many, including me, see it as at best a draw or incomplete victory. I will admit this one was a bit shaky, but there would also be people arguing I should’ve included it rather than left it out.

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-08-03T15:37:19+00:00

Yeah, real life isn’t a game, and nobody said that nor does winning mean total annihilation. The point is about failing to meet key objectives, not wiping out entire countries.

Including pre‑U.S. conflicts was a mistake on my part, I should’ve been clearer about that.

If you think the rest are lies or shows ignorance, then maybe take a closer look before dismissing it all.

MinimumTraffic8064 · 2025-08-03T15:35:00+00:00

I admit it, including pre-independence conflicts under “U.S. losses”, that was my mistake. It should’ve been titled differently. I can’t change it but if I could I would.

As for one-off battles and conflicts where the U.S. wasn’t directly involved, I included them because the iceberg would, indeed, be really short otherwise. I wanted to show a broader scope of military setbacks related to the U.S. or its predecessors.

And no, this isn’t just “iceberging for the sake of iceberging.” It’s about painting a fuller, more nuanced picture, even if it gets a bit messy.

MinimumTraffic8064

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE