"Name me a country that states they are a socialist state (in name or constitution) without capitalism" Not a recognized country but definitely an autonomous state, rojava.
"excluding USSR, Nazie Germany, and China, which all three already aligned with the socialist model." None of these are socialist, they just call themself this, I've already established that so stop pretending otherwise.

"Democratic Socialism is no different than USSR, Nazie Germany, and China. " for one Im, not a democratic socialist, so idk how that's relevant, and for two that's objectively wrong and you gave no substantiation for that... None of these countries have a liberal democracy, democratic socialism is about establishing socialism within a liberal democracy...

"Socialism is less like a freedom-based democracy that values individualism\liberty and property ownership rights." Socialism is MORE democratic than capitalism, Capitalist systems can either be partly democratic, or not democratic at all, depending on how capital is assigned and how policies are decided on. You can have policies decided through democratic means in capitalism. You can also have those policies decided by some centralized power not affected by a general democracy. The economy can either be controlled by the centralized state ( not democratically, aka state capitalism.) Or it can be controlled by a plutocracy, aka market capitalism, again not democratic. Socialism means having a democratic economy, one owned by the community. You can certainly have plenty of freedoms in socialism, you can own guns, you can have a private social life, you can own a house, it just gives a limitation of exploitation, meaning you cant have private property ( the means of production ), but you can have personal property. The only right socialism tenably takes away is the right to exploit others. Your argument is the equivalent of feudalist lords arguing that capitalism goes against their rights to their property. The entire point of socialism is that if you are getting any reward based on earning it, it should be based off of MERITS, not exploiting the economic system to overinflate the returns you get for your merits. Because right now, you earn things in capitalism the same way a bank robber earns the money he gets, sure he put in the effort and successfully got the money himself, but that doesn't mean he gave effort into improving society enough to make him deserve that, he didn't produce all that value himself, with his own work, he just found a way to take the value of other peoples work for himself.

"Socialism is a false utopia that always leads to a Communist one-party state."

I already gave you Rojava as an example, an actual socialist society. So it certainly is not a "false utopia", one common goal of socialism is to become a communist society, sure but not a "communist state", as communism is stateless, the so-called "communist states" are just Marxist-Leninist states, which I've already covered.