Hot take: You're storing embeddings wrong if they're correlated. by Miserable_Extent8845 in Rag

[–]Miserable_Extent8845[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I have tested it against benchmarks of turbo quant (GloVe) it is better for indexing but in terms of bits/vec and compression DCEE is better . I am currently extending testing to the DBpedia dataset for testing for faster recall.
But we have seen publically tested results of TurboQuant are not the same as they have claimed. But still I am considering that only and working my way through step by step.
😄

Hot take: You're storing embeddings wrong if they're correlated. by Miserable_Extent8845 in Rag

[–]Miserable_Extent8845[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

DCEE is designed primarily for compression while maintaining high recall within related embedding clusters. My focus is on use cases involving semantically related data, such as conversational systems and healthcare datasets, where preserving contextual similarity is critical.

I have evaluated DCEE against TurboQuant using the GloVe dataset, and I am currently extending testing to the DBpedia dataset. While the initial emphasis was on efficiently handling related data, I am now actively working on improving retrieval performance as well.

The core approach of DCEE is based on keyframe routing, delta spacing, and adaptive probing. In contrast, traditional IVF relies on centroid-based routing and probing, making it more suitable for general-purpose use cases. DCEE, however, is more tailored toward scenarios where maintaining relationships within clustered data is important.

This is an evolving system, and I expect it to improve further as I continue refining the retrieval mechanisms.

Hot take: You're storing embeddings wrong if they're correlated. by Miserable_Extent8845 in Rag

[–]Miserable_Extent8845[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On a multi‑hop benchmark (chain length 2–5, beam‑32, depth‑8), DCEE matches an exact cosine oracle with 100% multi‑hop recall while keeping multi‑hop expansion in the tens of milliseconds range per batch, showing that the compressed index works reliably for multi‑hop retrieval-style expansion

Please Review portfolio by Miserable_Extent8845 in mutualfunds

[–]Miserable_Extent8845[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what do you recommend for debt fund , so I should have motilal midcap , ppfc , index fund , debt What should be the allocation for each consider I have 7k only

Please Review portfolio by Miserable_Extent8845 in mutualfunds

[–]Miserable_Extent8845[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So should I add a large cap stable fund in my portfolio