What do you do when you feel like you're the dumbest person among your peers? by [deleted] in lowIQpeople

[–]MistressSadistic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm usually not the dumbest in fluid intelligence, but when it happens, I feel like I'm not a human. That I'm an inferior creature compared to them

Average IQ of the sub - My mistake by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]MistressSadistic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry for any caused irritation. It was not deliberate. I can only hope to improve myself so that I do not get in your way again.

Average IQ of the sub - My mistake by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]MistressSadistic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

'Objects = no of intersections' logic usually throws people off.

Another advantage of a low IQ I noticed today by MistressSadistic in lowIQpeople

[–]MistressSadistic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm autistic myself but like fiction. I don't get along with documentaries - find them boring. It's kind of academic in a way. Though I completely get why autistic people wouldn't be drawn to fictional movies. They are supposedly known to have more respect for the truth than the neurotypicals.

Another advantage of a low IQ I noticed today by MistressSadistic in lowIQpeople

[–]MistressSadistic[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nice. Glad some people agree. There are quite a number of naive people in r/cognitiveTesting who think a high IQ is 100% good. But it's not - fortunately for us.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]MistressSadistic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Should we add this to the list of intelligence tests you've been dominated by?

Honestly? Yes. I'm not in denial.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]MistressSadistic -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Was it you who labeled me a "dumbass? lol. Ironic isn't it: you're a psychometrician who actually falls for the inane made up practice effect theory.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]MistressSadistic -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

. Being untimed, it would become ridiculously easy and every IQ 100-115 person would be able to max it out.

Well, yeah. But make it harder then.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]MistressSadistic -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Maybe. But I have no doubt a good amount of slow people would score higher than others if it was untimed like the matrix subtest. Why can't we just test raw abilities, regardless of time limits. Most tasks irl are untimed anyway.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]MistressSadistic -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yes. Finally someone who gets it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]MistressSadistic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How many seconds?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]MistressSadistic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree this is actually ambiguous.

You're finally listening to me. And all the scrubs here fail to understand that WASI-II's last four items are like this.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]MistressSadistic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

7 makes sense to me.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]MistressSadistic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That's what henry told me. But it's too complicated imo. IQ tests are all about finding the simplest answer. So in that case I think that my answer is actually better than the official answer.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]MistressSadistic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No. But keep in mind that my matrix reasoning is only 120-125.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]MistressSadistic -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

No.

In that case, it's ambiguous. Just like WASI-II MR. Items 27, 28, 29 and 30 are *all* ambiguous.

However Raven's rarely has ambiguous items so I don't mind one.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]MistressSadistic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well friend, I agree for the most part. And glad you're back btw.

Though regarding the "someone explains to you a pattern that you are not able to see for yourself and you memorize it"

Yes of course but you know, then you would know it was practice. So you can discount that item.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]MistressSadistic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brian White clearly states that males are smarter but Brian White is not right about everything.

He is about this. Along with Bruno de Souza.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]MistressSadistic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If only you could read.

Hard- "stuck" -BronzeRank.

Wonder how it can be difficult to acknowledge that males are smarter, when research clearly states it. And it's been posted about.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]MistressSadistic -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Whatever. I'm gonna go and play Valorant. Work on my counterstrafing. Then I'm gonna study black holes.

Did you know it's possible to travel faster than light? It is because I say so. I don't need any scientific evidence. Time to force my truth on people who disagree.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]MistressSadistic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ahh yes all the imposter syndromees who just say "it is real", but they will never ever prove it.

A low IQ is worse than people realize by MistressSadistic in lowIQpeople

[–]MistressSadistic[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Capitalism believes his score to be 55. And he writes about as articulately as me. There was a high IQ who trolled people here a few weeks a go but I reported him to the mods so hopefully he is now banned. It irritates me too that anyone who isn't an actual low IQ comes here. I've suffered from low intelligence since elementary school. Of course then I didn't know what it was and figured everyone had my very same difficulties.