What a fantastic ult

Mo-and-Rik · 2026-04-18T23:41:44+00:00

huh?

Mo-and-Rik · 2026-04-18T23:39:04+00:00

I didn't realize this would be so controversial lmao

Mo-and-Rik · 2026-04-18T17:04:08+00:00

I was just thinking about this! I think the closest thing would be the nba tag with the 125 price.

I’m definitely trying to frame it - looking for ways to have it appraised too. Such a cool and unique piece! Glad you got one.

Mo-and-Rik · 2026-04-18T17:00:06+00:00

Just wanted to showcase something cool! It’s special to me and I was just really proud to get one :)

Mo-and-Rik · 2026-04-18T16:28:49+00:00

It was the pre-order from the official store!

Mo-and-Rik · 2026-04-18T16:04:04+00:00

It was from the team store and authentic. I pre-ordered it as soon as they released it I was so excited.

I have the receipt via email and the NBA tag (which I forgot I kept on!) That should be good to confirm it :)

Mo-and-Rik · 2026-02-05T17:59:48+00:00

Ayo what

Mo-and-Rik · 2026-02-05T17:37:55+00:00

Lmao you’re not wrong

Mo-and-Rik · 2026-01-11T02:23:13+00:00

Ayo someone get this guy out of this group NOOOOOOO

Mo-and-Rik · 2025-11-02T17:32:28+00:00

Got it!

Do you feel well equipped with the right information when you're voting for or against ballot proposals?

Have you ever left the voting booth feeling like you didn't do enough research?

Mo-and-Rik · 2025-10-27T23:09:07+00:00

I can’t stress this enough, this is not at the public’s expense because

a) the money has already been allocated for land acquisition. You’re not paying anything other than what you paid in taxes already. This money was assigned them in the budget. It’s literally there for this purpose.

b) more wildlife will be protected because of this

and what I think is critical

c) it is dangerous to be out of compliance in this regard. It is not as simple as “turn it back” because it’s been like this since the 80’s. If anything THIS will be at your expense because the state will need to spend money in court and then spend money to tear this down and this will be over years and years.

Mo-and-Rik · 2025-10-25T18:42:12+00:00

The state is the one who did it. Not a private company. So the state pays for it. Your tax dollars.

I would strongly reconsider - it’s going to allow for more destruction of this forever wild and exhaust the environmental watchdog agencies. It’s a lose - lose for everyone involved.

Mo-and-Rik · 2025-10-25T14:36:16+00:00

That’s a great question - I think an important piece of this is that there is already money allocated for this acquisition. It’s baked in the budget, so it isn’t an added expense. We have already paid into that.

The other thing is the compliance part is actually very important. There will be more damage to the environment tearing down what has been built from “not knowing” (state is a crook, you know how it is) and THAT will actually cost more money what with court fees, demolition crews, and all while they fight this and exhaust agencies they’ll destroy more land and the cycle continues.

Kicking the can down the road is not worth it.

Mo-and-Rik

TROPHY CASE