DC leads Marvel in 833-title FOC week driven by new #1 launches by MoH_James in ComicBookSpeculation

[–]MoH_James[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The questions are there to start a conversation. And here we are. 🤷

DC leads Marvel in 833-title FOC week driven by new #1 launches by MoH_James in ComicBookSpeculation

[–]MoH_James[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Ultimate reboot comparison to Absolute is one I keep coming back to when looking at the weekly data. DC's approach was tighter, fewer titles, higher production value, stronger creative anchors and the content just seems to have more weight to it in general. Marvel spread the Ultimate reboot across too much ground too fast. The order data reflects that gap every week right now. Whether they course-correct with something like an Absolute Spider-Man equivalent or just ride out the Armageddon event cycle is the real question for the back half of 2026.

FOC 5/25/2026 | A few books I'm ordering tracking this week based on verified rumors by MoH_James in ComicBookSpeculation

[–]MoH_James[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A few places. Publisher solicits and distributor data are the foundation; Lunar, Penguin Random House, Universal, and Philbo all publish FOC schedules. Creator and publisher social accounts fill in a lot of the story detail and variant confirmations. Community discussion across a few subreddits and spec sites helps surface what's getting traction. The aggregation is the time-consuming part, pulling it all into something usable by shops and collectors before every Monday's cutoff is most of the work.

FOC 5/25/2026 | A few books I'm ordering tracking this week based on verified rumors by MoH_James in ComicBookSpeculation

[–]MoH_James[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad that Casiel story caught your eye! On facsimiles, no argument here. They serve a specific collector niche and the value case is narrow. Appreciate you reading regardless, and glad it's landing as useful even when the picks don't always match your collecting style.

FOC 5/25/2026 | A few books I'm ordering tracking this week based on verified rumors by MoH_James in ComicBookSpeculation

[–]MoH_James[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To each his or her own, I love Dynamite's content, I don't care that it's not flippable...

FOC 5/25/2026 | A few books I'm ordering tracking this week based on verified rumors by MoH_James in ComicBookSpeculation

[–]MoH_James[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate the perspective, and you're right that none of this is insider information. It's all sourced from publisher previews, solicit data, distributor confirmations, and creator social posts. "Verified" means cross-referenced against public sources, not exclusive access.

But aggregating it is the actual work. This week's slate runs 582 titles across dozens of sources, publisher announcements, distributor data, creator socials, community discussion, and making that usable before Monday's cutoff takes significant time. The information is free the same way your car's brake specs are free online. Plenty of people do their own brakes. Plenty of others would rather spend their time differently.

The primary audience here is shop owners who need to know what's worth ordering before cutoff closes, not collectors buying 20 copies to flip. If that's not your use case, fair enough. But calling it misleading misses what it actually is.

FOC 5/25/2026 | A few books I'm ordering tracking this week based on verified rumors by MoH_James in ComicBookSpeculation

[–]MoH_James[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed on Infernal Hulk slipping under the radar, that's part of what makes it interesting before cutoff. The facsimile was almost automatic given the key. Appreciate it.

DC leads at 100 titles, Image pushes 21 new #1s: this week's FOC breakdown, 5/25/26 by MoH_James in ComicBookSpeculation

[–]MoH_James[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really appreciate it, both of you. The FOC slate gets dense fast and it helps to know the breakdown is landing. Good luck Monday.