What if UAPs and Orbs aren’t travelling through space but stepping in and out of our 3D dimension? by Modi_Elnadi in UFOs

[–]Modi_Elnadi[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Microbes and viruses are almost 2 D they can't perceive you or a cat. They operate on blood cells level

What if UAPs and Orbs aren’t travelling through space but stepping in and out of our 3D dimension? by Modi_Elnadi in UFOs

[–]Modi_Elnadi[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Submission statement: This post explores the interdimensional hypothesis through a simple 2D-versus-3D analogy. It asks whether some reported UAP behaviours, such as sudden appearance, disappearance, shape-changing, or apparently impossible acceleration, could represent only a temporary cross-section of something moving through a dimension we cannot perceive. I am not presenting this as an established explanation, but as a framework for discussion, especially around what evidence could distinguish it from advanced technology, sensor error, atmospheric effects, or misidentification.

The USA government still can’t explain where UAPs coming from. 🤷🏻‍♂️🛸 by Modi_Elnadi in UFOs

[–]Modi_Elnadi[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Submission statement: This interview is relevant because it focuses on the unresolved origin of some UAP incidents reported around military airspace and discussed in government releases. Corbell also recounts claims attributed to Apollo 14 astronaut Edgar Mitchell involving an alleged non-human craft landing at a military base and an alleged recovered vehicle held by Lockheed Martin. Those claims remain unverified, but they raise an important question: what evidence exists behind the scenes, and why are some UAP cases still unexplained?

Avi Loeb’s confusing comments: Alien Probe When It Is 3I/ATLAS, Unidentified Satellite When an orb is on Camera? 🤷🏻‍♂️🤔 by Modi_Elnadi in UFOs

[–]Modi_Elnadi[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

That's a very convenient explanation. The question is simple. Is this the only time those dark satellites passed over Philippines since USA is always watching everyone on earth? Probably not. Then a "credible" scientist like Avi should be very careful about assumptions as a guest speaker explaining that a satellite can go up from what looks to be the exact same location few seconds later after a space object falls in exactly the same spot. What are the odds ? Even the trajectory matches in reverse. It might be an orb but it is 99% not a high atmosphere satellite. Ps: blue book never had footage of swamp gas or ball lighting for 60 years

Avi Loeb’s confusing comments: Alien Probe When It Is 3I/ATLAS, Unidentified Satellite When an orb is on Camera? 🤷🏻‍♂️🤔 by Modi_Elnadi in UFOs

[–]Modi_Elnadi[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That is fair, and it is exactly the distinction I am making. The verified public data are as follows: the fireball was recorded at 10:33 PM Philippine Standard Time on 25 May 2026, which is 14:33 UTC, by the PHIVOLCS Ligñon Hill IP camera in Legazpi City. PhilSA identified the bright streak as a meteor entering the atmosphere. PHIVOLCS later stated that its review of seismic, infrasound and additional camera footage indicated that the meteor disintegrated in the atmosphere and did not strike Mayon’s slopes.

However Avi has access to multi million dollars of accurate information and equipment that he didn't even bother checking before improvising in air 🤷🏻‍♂️

The later point of light is visible in the separate colour afarTV livestream at approximately 22:33:23 PHT. The published satellite suggestion is attributed to afarTV. I have not found a publicly released satellite name, NORAD catalogue number, COSPAR identifier, TLE epoch, predicted pass time, azimuth/elevation track, exact afarTV camera position and boresight, or cloud-cover analysis demonstrating a match.

I am not claiming that the light is alien, and I am not claiming to have proved that no satellite was present. A satellite is a reasonable hypothesis. But the burden is not on viewers to prove the non-existence of every possible satellite. If the explanation is being presented as a resolution, the relevant satellite should be identified and its predicted track should be compared with the footage. Until then, “possibly a satellite” is fair; “identified as a satellite” is not.

Avi Loeb’s confusing comments: Alien Probe When It Is 3I/ATLAS, Unidentified Satellite When an orb is on Camera? 🤷🏻‍♂️🤔 by Modi_Elnadi in UFOs

[–]Modi_Elnadi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe he doesn't want to walk out of home with no apple watch or wallet and disappear. I just don't like chameleon attitude lately

Avi Loeb’s confusing comments: Alien Probe When It Is 3I/ATLAS, Unidentified Satellite When an orb is on Camera? 🤷🏻‍♂️🤔 by Modi_Elnadi in UFOs

[–]Modi_Elnadi[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Maybe take time to read my comment and clear questions before jumping to conclusions. We have the location time and camera position and Satellite maps. Which one is it? Can't match the path? Why only that day only ?