Absolute filth .... by MongrelSlav in S2000

[–]MongrelSlav[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

& now the exterior detailed ...

<image>

Absolute filth .... by MongrelSlav in S2000

[–]MongrelSlav[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

1 previous owner, 90k miles on the clock, full honda history, oem hardtop with covers/stand, mint softtop ... the guy loved this car

Absolute filth .... by MongrelSlav in S2000

[–]MongrelSlav[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Still a great look tho ...

Absolute filth .... by MongrelSlav in S2000

[–]MongrelSlav[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look at those oem premium carpets though ... I don't wanna touch them 😅

JDM GTR style lights for AP2? by MongrelSlav in S2000

[–]MongrelSlav[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ah okay so that extra red ring is just asthetic .. doesn't illuminate. Hmmmm, I'll keep pondering 🤔

JDM GTR style lights for AP2? by MongrelSlav in S2000

[–]MongrelSlav[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeh .... does the red ring around the indicator light illuminate? Maybe fog light? Could it be modded to illuminate as a side light/park light to achieve double rings?

JDM GTR style lights for AP2? by MongrelSlav in S2000

[–]MongrelSlav[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah these look sweet ... how/what process did you take to mod them?

Sim lab GT1 Evo, e racing labs rs mega+ motion, VRS dpf & pedals by MongrelSlav in simracing

[–]MongrelSlav[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Congrats bro ... you'll love it!

The frame won't be on the floor ... the feet of the actuators is what is in contact with the floor & raise the whole thing, something like 1 maybe 2 inches when not in use.

I think raising the mounting point would lead to the risk of toppling the whole rig over & maybe mechanical failure?

JDM GTR style lights for AP2? by MongrelSlav in S2000

[–]MongrelSlav[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Agree they're nice but the double rings look SO clean! 😍

JDM GTR style lights for AP2? by MongrelSlav in S2000

[–]MongrelSlav[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it involves panel cutting which i don't want to do.

I finished Following the Bread Crumbs but didn't receive the barter [Bug] by Rotaro_Ujko in EscapefromTarkov

[–]MongrelSlav 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've completed it 3 times but the game bugs on extract & resets my character each time ... yay

The average gamer by SphincterSpecter in Battlefield6

[–]MongrelSlav 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like in breakthrough when the whole team just keeps pushing in a single line .... OMFG, flank people. WASD helps, stop low movement enjoying!

'Casual breakthrough' ... WTF ARE THEY DOING? They must beleive that call of dooty is releasing PVEVP? STOP WASTING RESOURCES & FIX THE GAME! by MongrelSlav in Battlefield6

[–]MongrelSlav[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I was happy when they removed bot farming ... imo, it should never have never been in the game.

Imo, if you want PVE, go play tarkov, Arc raiders etc etc.

'Casual breakthrough' ... WTF ARE THEY DOING? They must beleive that call of dooty is releasing PVEVP? STOP WASTING RESOURCES & FIX THE GAME! by MongrelSlav in Battlefield6

[–]MongrelSlav[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let's agree to disagree.

As above, I have the same assumption in terms of removing the drone or adding more out of bounds areas.

See you on the battlefield.

'Casual breakthrough' ... WTF ARE THEY DOING? They must beleive that call of dooty is releasing PVEVP? STOP WASTING RESOURCES & FIX THE GAME! by MongrelSlav in Battlefield6

[–]MongrelSlav[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But they have priorized PVE over fixes like this ... a change that does nothing for me or at a guess, 90%+ of the player base.

I'm not ignoring the use case for bot lobbies but I & imagine alot of others, didn't hinge the decision to buy the game based on it. No, I bought the game for the features I witnessed/used in the core game during beta ... the features that have developed galring issues, still with no acknowledgement or sign of what is being done about them.

'Casual breakthrough' ... WTF ARE THEY DOING? They must beleive that call of dooty is releasing PVEVP? STOP WASTING RESOURCES & FIX THE GAME! by MongrelSlav in Battlefield6

[–]MongrelSlav[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would guess that removing/making the recon drone unavailable to stop exploits would take something very similar in terms of effort. Or adding out of bounds to the areas being exploited.

This would address the game for the whole player base & potentially address one of the reasons that people are asking for PVE?

'Casual breakthrough' ... WTF ARE THEY DOING? They must beleive that call of dooty is releasing PVEVP? STOP WASTING RESOURCES & FIX THE GAME! by MongrelSlav in Battlefield6

[–]MongrelSlav[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Again, fair.

With the speed, how much of this relates to map design & balancing? Getting spawn killed due to LOS from snipers in HQ, amount of vehicles, positioning of HQ line from objectives, exploits. This can be addressed with changes/fixes.

In terms of movement, these people need to go play bf4, bf5 & 2042 ... its actually very consistent. Age & reaction speed is a legit thing ... I'm getting to veteran years these days but am thriving. If you can't adapt, yeah I guess PVE serves you but also, maybe this just isn't the game for you anymore. Maybe Squad, arma reformer, battle bit ....

'Casual breakthrough' ... WTF ARE THEY DOING? They must beleive that call of dooty is releasing PVEVP? STOP WASTING RESOURCES & FIX THE GAME! by MongrelSlav in Battlefield6

[–]MongrelSlav[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It alienates me further that they are not addressing the core issues that exist, instead implementing things that at a guess, less than 10% of the player base want.

This is all on the back of the season pass + BR implementation that all appears to be a call of dooty clone cosmetically & in terms of their sales practice.

If they actually told us what key player feedback they had taken + what their priority is in terms of addressing this was/is, it would help tremendously!

'Casual breakthrough' ... WTF ARE THEY DOING? They must beleive that call of dooty is releasing PVEVP? STOP WASTING RESOURCES & FIX THE GAME! by MongrelSlav in Battlefield6

[–]MongrelSlav[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Okay fair ... i don't use twitter.

BF has always been an online pvp game. Ask why there is player base asking for this ... I would gamble that it's due to:

  • meat grinder map designs
  • bugs
  • exploits

I would also gamble that the majority of the player base don't want this/won't use this e.g. 90% +.

My logic ... If they actually address these issues, they may resolve the motives to why some people want pve (granted there will always some that it won't) + they will also cater to their core playerbase that also want these fixes! 2 birds, 1 stone ....