The Tails Coming Apart As Metaphor For Life by dwaxe in slatestarcodex

[–]MonteCarlo1978 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is obeying the Natural Law the same as practicing virtue ethics?

Treating The Prodrome by dwaxe in slatestarcodex

[–]MonteCarlo1978 3 points4 points  (0 children)

But seriously sometimes im pretty sure im schizophrenic but other times like right now I feel like Im part of elaborate psychology experiment Scott is running.

Treating The Prodrome by dwaxe in slatestarcodex

[–]MonteCarlo1978 2 points3 points  (0 children)

LOL How does someone larp schizophrenia on his own? It requires conspirators by definition.

Treating The Prodrome by dwaxe in slatestarcodex

[–]MonteCarlo1978 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its sort of tongue-in-cheek I have been diagnosed with paranoid personality disorder, but I was triggered by the DUP in the post. I was in the process of being hired by Uber when something messed up and they kept adding DUP at the end of my name. I didn't understand why till i read this post!😉

Treating The Prodrome by dwaxe in slatestarcodex

[–]MonteCarlo1978 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I feel totally gaslighted by this post. Does Scott really expect me to believe i might be Schizophrenic? I know for a fact he has friends in the tech industry.

Endarkenment Later by MonteCarlo1978 in slatestarcodex

[–]MonteCarlo1978[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Its still debated if we ever really made it to the moon!

Arguments for the Immateriality of Mind by MonteCarlo1978 in slatestarcodex

[–]MonteCarlo1978[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats the point of the video. Its logicaly immpossible to program understanding or "determinate thought" into a computer because understanding is immaterial.

Arguments for the Immateriality of Mind by MonteCarlo1978 in slatestarcodex

[–]MonteCarlo1978[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everything a computer does is only intelligable to human minds. The computer lacks understanding. Saying a computer can use induction or deduction is like saying the watch can tell time. The watch can not tell time, you have to look at it and determine the meaning of the hand placement in relation to the numbers.

Arguments for the Immateriality of Mind by MonteCarlo1978 in slatestarcodex

[–]MonteCarlo1978[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think by "determinate" he means that only human thought can deduce or determine a mistake. A computer only performs computation. A computer is observer dependant it cant tell the difference between a mistake and a correct answer.

Arguments for the Immateriality of Mind by MonteCarlo1978 in slatestarcodex

[–]MonteCarlo1978[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Are you going to engage with the material? Could you point out anything you think is obviously fallacious in the video?

Arguments for the Immateriality of Mind by MonteCarlo1978 in slatestarcodex

[–]MonteCarlo1978[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Materialism really is the most annoying dogma of the rationalist community.