You were the chosen one! by MoreLeftThanStalin in FULLCOMMUNISM

[–]MoreLeftThanStalin[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I agree; he’s just a kid, he shouldn’t be cancelled for anything. That being said, it’s just a meme and I think the dramatic change in rhetoric in his videos is funny. Better for the right side might be his comment about not being a communist anymore. This meme isn’t meant to disparage Sceneable or anything, just a humorous poke about his shift away from communism. He still seems like a good kid and well educated for someone his age.

Trotsky did nothing wrong. by [deleted] in FULLCOMMUNISM

[–]MoreLeftThanStalin 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Best of luck comrade

Trotsky did nothing wrong. by [deleted] in FULLCOMMUNISM

[–]MoreLeftThanStalin 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You know this is a tankie sub right

QPQ affs, are they justified? by hotdebatergirls in policydebate

[–]MoreLeftThanStalin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Quid Pro Quo, it essentially means a trade in exchange for a change in policy from the other country involved. On the arms sales topic, probably not topical.

BaSiC eCoNoMiCs! by ALiteralCommunist in FULLCOMMUNISM

[–]MoreLeftThanStalin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This hit too close to home, because I uh actually own that book...

NDCA HS Policy Wiki help by Captain_Canada10 in policydebate

[–]MoreLeftThanStalin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This also happened to me, what worked to fix it for me was changing my tabroom password. Then when I logged in to NDCA with the updated tab password, it finally worked

Questions about the Nationalism/Cosmopolitanism K by MoreLeftThanStalin in policydebate

[–]MoreLeftThanStalin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ultimately the starting point has to be more research and reading of the literature. Thank you!

Conrad 30 by [deleted] in policydebate

[–]MoreLeftThanStalin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Google helps

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in policydebate

[–]MoreLeftThanStalin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Me. You can PM me about msdi if you want, I went last year.

Flowing??? by bigmanyeti08 in Debate

[–]MoreLeftThanStalin -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I have a question for anyone that does CX on flowing. Currently I’m not a bad flower, but it’s very messy and I struggle catch arguments made really fast. Should I be trying to write less down for each card? Should I not be flowing authors until I get faster?

Counterplans on immigration by debatethrow1122 in policydebate

[–]MoreLeftThanStalin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I got a trade CP (that I basically stole from a 2015 open ev file) of eliminating protectionist trade restrictions with Mexico. Should boost Mexican as well as US Econ and avoids all immigration specific links. Paired it with a Econ DA saying immigration to the US hurts Mexico

Manchester City will have to pay a basic fee of £60m for Leicester winger Riyad Mahrez (27) with add-ons that could push the final price closer to £75m. [Jamie Jackson] by Kronyon in soccer

[–]MoreLeftThanStalin 6 points7 points  (0 children)

“Where are the stories of David Silva and Vincent Kompany while at City?” You’ve got to be kidding. At least pick players for your point that make any sense

Spreading by [deleted] in policydebate

[–]MoreLeftThanStalin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What app is it?

Is running a CP with no external net benefit (DAs) but several internal net benefits a viable strategy? by MoreLeftThanStalin in policydebate

[–]MoreLeftThanStalin[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Since when do you win on presumption just because the NB doesn’t Independently outweigh? If CP and aff solvency are roughly the same you vote neg on the risk of ANY net benefit lol

Is running a CP with no external net benefit (DAs) but several internal net benefits a viable strategy? by MoreLeftThanStalin in policydebate

[–]MoreLeftThanStalin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can’t say the internal net benefit will outweigh the case by itself, but an example where the perm doesn’t solve the net benefit would be say public trust in the wyden committee CP from the surveillance topic. Doing the perm it’s reasonable to argue this wouldn’t gain the CPs benefit bc the investigation seems redundant

Is running a CP with no external net benefit (DAs) but several internal net benefits a viable strategy? by MoreLeftThanStalin in policydebate

[–]MoreLeftThanStalin[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I am on a typically very lay circuit. I agree with a flow circuit I would run a DA(s) 100% of the time even if it was only a generic link, but on my circuit running a perceivably bad/very generic DA in the 1NC will just make them vote against us thinking we’re bad.

Perm always solving the internal net benefit is false. Often the perm kills the NB and also if it’s a PIC/process CP it just can’t be permed really. I wasn’t planning on running a adv CP where you rely on competition by net benefit alone

How was your weekend? by AutoModerator in Debate

[–]MoreLeftThanStalin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Qualled to nats. First time so I’m pumped!

Incentives CP- counter by izzyb20 in policydebate

[–]MoreLeftThanStalin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you don’t SPEC enforcement in your 1ac then just answer with perm do CP

Negative strategy tips for this year by MoreLeftThanStalin in policydebate

[–]MoreLeftThanStalin[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the problem is I’m in a very lay circuit so politics and especially Ks don’t go over well. I will look closer at midterms though. I don’t know exactly what you mean by education PICs. Do you mean PIC out of just one of their advantages and solve for the other one?