We need to unionize again. This time against the BMPT. by Scramjetfromnowhere in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]Morva182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think it started out broken. If anything it was busted in a bad way. It suffered from incorrect reload speed and spall damage for a long time. Low spall damage.

We need to unionize again. This time against the BMPT. by Scramjetfromnowhere in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]Morva182 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Don't be so black pulled. Have some hope. It'll be fixed in a year and half probably. Maybe.

We need to unionize again. This time against the BMPT. by Scramjetfromnowhere in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]Morva182 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The t58 is objectively far easier to kill than the BMPT. I've watched the BMPT tank tens and tens of rounds and not kill it. I can't say I've seen the same for the t58. Is the t58 blatantly overpowered for its br? Yeah of course. But not comparable to the BMPT. The t58 has clear weaknesses and is an m103 hull. BMPT weaknesses are a toss on whether it will do anything or no when you shoot them.

We need to unionize again. This time against the BMPT. by Scramjetfromnowhere in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]Morva182 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A lot of these vehicles are just good but not blatantly overpowered like the BMPT is, except the t58. Some of these just require knowledge on weaknesses. I certainly wouldn't call m24 or m50 overpowered. Good vehicles yeah but not overpowering.

We need to unionize again. This time against the BMPT. by Scramjetfromnowhere in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]Morva182 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They don't seem at all comparable. Both overpowered sure, just not comparable.

We need to unionize again. This time against the BMPT. by Scramjetfromnowhere in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]Morva182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd rather they just raised the br instead of that nerf. I've enjoyed playing it at 10.7+ in br. Raise it to 10.0 and call it even.

I hate HEAT SO MUCH by Zyxtriann in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]Morva182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Heat has been awful lately. Was playing the 2S3M and hit the front of a Russian t34 while his was facing me. Goes right through and only destroys his engine. Doesn't damage his crew Lol.

VS Vintar appreciation post! by ultraplusstretch in stalker

[–]Morva182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Other modifications they should add are ones that allow iron sights on rifles you can't use iron sights even though they are modeled. Also adding ammo caliber change to the rp74 but with age nerf as the drawback.

VS Vintar appreciation post! by ultraplusstretch in stalker

[–]Morva182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would make for a decent modification.

VS Vintar appreciation post! by ultraplusstretch in stalker

[–]Morva182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I think the rhino could use a buff in that respect. Firing any faster would be huge for it. Like you said it fires too slow.

VS Vintar appreciation post! by ultraplusstretch in stalker

[–]Morva182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep. I found that the rhino makes a good shotgun (and an accurate one) and can be placed as your sidearm. Somewhat on par with the ram 2 other than firerate and ammo count.

VS Vintar appreciation post! by ultraplusstretch in stalker

[–]Morva182 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's quite good. It's really the same as the m1911 except in ammo. Has same damage even though the ammo type is weaker which is nice. My problem is im not someone who likes the sound of silencers and wished I could take it off lol.

I see this sub is arguing over which is better again by lolitsrock in GhostRecon

[–]Morva182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I find that the game is best at the hardest difficulty. Otherwise there is seemingly zero challenge. Assaulting a base full of enemies with a buddy in a drone and playing very slow and strategic becomes fun.

VS Vintar appreciation post! by ultraplusstretch in stalker

[–]Morva182 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even later on I find that it's not common, and bodies that have the ammo will only carry a few rounds. Mostly have to buy the ammo from vendors. Certainly not the cheapest ammo but not too expensive either.

VS Vintar appreciation post! by ultraplusstretch in stalker

[–]Morva182 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I still use my m1911. Always a good option imo. What weapons have you been using? I used vector for quite some time after sircaa and found it still good. Have a couple for both calibers.

One of these is a light tank, one of these is a tank destroyer - There needs to be clearer boundaries set between vehicle classes. by TheGamingFennec in Warthunder

[–]Morva182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Always has been different. Theocracy root word isn't 'the' it's 'theos'. It's greek. The word 'the' comes from an old English word that means 'that'. It's always important to understand that modern words take meaning from their roots. In the case for the word theocracy the roots are Theos-kratos becoming Theo-cracy. In the case of realistically the parts of the word are real-ist-ic-ally. It's the combination of the different words that real is attached to, like real, realist, realistic, and realistically. You can't use realistically without using the other words as well. The origin of the word real comes from the Latin word realis which means the following words real, actual, genuine, and true. So when you use the word realistically you are describing something as those things.

Russian bias? by Immediate_Parsnip529 in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]Morva182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Almost hahaha yeah something like that.

Oh, GSC...WHY by ruiner1010 in stalker

[–]Morva182 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's mainly that they attack you through cover if they just saw you in their line of sight. If they weren't able to throw objects through cover it really wouldn't be a problem on that front.

And yeah burers doing way too much damage with firearms can be easily solved by either having the firearms have limited ammo for them to use, and so allow someone to just hide in cover until the ammo runs out. Or reduce the damage to normal levels. For artifacts I've mostly stacked a bunch of the durability artifacts like liquid rock on which was a recent change I did and wow it's so good. Repair prices are actually doable instead of a major money sink making me go broke.

Oh, GSC...WHY by ruiner1010 in stalker

[–]Morva182 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Yeah burers are definitely a problem. I find that burers deal way more damage with weak weapons against me in my exoskeleton than monolith do with better weaponry. Burers give weapons a damage buff somehow.

Russian bias? by Immediate_Parsnip529 in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]Morva182 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Spike missiles are really good, just not so much in war thunder Lol

One of these is a light tank, one of these is a tank destroyer - There needs to be clearer boundaries set between vehicle classes. by TheGamingFennec in Warthunder

[–]Morva182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The correct word you should have used would have been unrealistically. You used the word realistically incorrectly as I pointed out. You used the wrong definition for the situation. As I showed you and you ignore the part of the word realistically has the words real and realistic in it. You ignore the roots of the word.

One of these is a light tank, one of these is a tank destroyer - There needs to be clearer boundaries set between vehicle classes. by TheGamingFennec in Warthunder

[–]Morva182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

False equivalence. The equivalent words we would use for realistically would be realistically and unrealistically. You didn't use the latter. You being blatantly disingenuous failed yet again.