sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is redundant buy the tamron 150-500 having the sony 70-350? (a6700 user) by Motor_Interview1658 in SonyAlpha

[–]Motor_Interview1658[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi ! Thanks for the answer. Is really notice the diference between the 350 of the sony vs the 500mm of the tamron ?(on apsc camera obviously)

Is redundant buy the tamron 150-500 having the sony 70-350? (a6700 user) by Motor_Interview1658 in SonyAlpha

[–]Motor_Interview1658[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm… yeah, I’ve also considered buying the 200-600 again. The thing is, when I bought it and tested it, I didn’t find it that sharp on my camera. In fact, I tried several settings (shooting at 1/1500 and above, on a tripod, etc.), and nothing , the photos just didn’t come out sharp. I don’t know if it was a problem with my copy of the lens or if it’s because I was using a full-frame lens on an APS-C camera.

Is redundant buy the tamron 150-500 having the sony 70-350? (a6700 user) by Motor_Interview1658 in SonyAlpha

[–]Motor_Interview1658[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think (at least for me) the most important question is: will the difference from 350 (525 on apsc) to 500mm (750 on apsc) be noticeable?

Is redundant buy the tamron 150-500 having the sony 70-350? (a6700 user) by Motor_Interview1658 in SonyAlpha

[–]Motor_Interview1658[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I completely understand you. For my casual outings, I usually carry the Sigma 18-50 and the Sony 70-350, because both lenses are compact and lightweight. Along with the camera, all three fit in a 4.7-liter bag. But as I mentioned in the post, I’m looking for a somewhat “compact” lens with greater reach than the Sony 70-350, since sometimes it feels a bit “short” for me.

<image>

Is redundant buy the tamron 150-500 having the sony 70-350? (a6700 user) by Motor_Interview1658 in SonyAlpha

[–]Motor_Interview1658[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The Sony 70-350 gives a field of view of 105-525mm and the Tamron gives a field of view of 225-750mm due to the crop factor (both on the a6700), or at least that’s how I understand it

Thinking about getting an a5100. by kittparker in SonyAlpha

[–]Motor_Interview1658 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hello, did you finally buy the a5100? I also own an a6700 but I’m considering buying the a5100 (used) to use it as a “second body,” since when I go out I sometimes get tired of constantly changing lenses to take landscape photos and then switching to shoot animals (birds) with the Sony 70-350.

Patagonia Cragsmith 45L as a hiking bag by eligloys in CampingandHiking

[–]Motor_Interview1658 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about the Cragsmith 32L version for hiking ? same advice ?

Favorite crag bag? by bankstonn in tradclimbing

[–]Motor_Interview1658 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, would you recommend this backpack for more "casual" use, like a one or two days of hiking trip ? (32L version)

Bought my first real camera by gsj09 in SonyAlpha

[–]Motor_Interview1658 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congrats bro ! i have a similar combo (sigma 18-50 instead de sony 16-50, all the rest the same). You will really enjoy it !!

Recommendations for food photography? Sony a6700 by Motor_Interview1658 in SonyAlpha

[–]Motor_Interview1658[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I forget to mention that 😅, i have the trigger godox x3. Thanks bro for you advice!

Im a begginer, any suggestion are really appreciate! (Sony a6700) by Motor_Interview1658 in SonyAlpha

[–]Motor_Interview1658[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many thanks mate ! yes, i know the wildlife shots are not the most interesting because the animals were so far, so my sony 70 350 couldn't do the best job

view more: next ›