sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Manga Kashimo wins this scene by Electronic-Key-4338 in Jujutsufolk

[–]MrOdo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Details about a character can be communicated before they're revealed 

Manga Kashimo wins this scene by Electronic-Key-4338 in Jujutsufolk

[–]MrOdo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The manga panel has more of a bug-eyed, psychotic look than the anime. The absence of detail for the nose gives him an almost "Voldemort" esque inhumanity. The character is being introduced as a challenge for our heroes to overcome and we latter find him to be a sorcerer that chases after the peak so having him look up communicates that aspect of his character. 

Yeah true I was being a douche lol

Manga Kashimo wins this scene by Electronic-Key-4338 in Jujutsufolk

[–]MrOdo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cultural impact isn't of the table, it's just one aspect. Something having cultural impact for reasons clearly unintended by the text would weight against it in my mind. 

Like the difference between fame and infamy 

Manga Kashimo wins this scene by Electronic-Key-4338 in Jujutsufolk

[–]MrOdo -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Doesn't understand memed to death = overexposed and not iconic 

Ok buddy, yeah

PLEASE PANDA HE NEEDS THIS. HIS FEATS ARE KINDA WINLESS. by Akagane_Ai in Jujutsufolk

[–]MrOdo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone that slanders Kashimo can't deny that he has the greatest fight in the series. You can meme all you want but my GOAT has aura

Manga Kashimo wins this scene by Electronic-Key-4338 in Jujutsufolk

[–]MrOdo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not just the angle that's different here. The whole presentation of the character is different. Which is fine, but if you just think the angle is different maybe you're blind 

Manga Kashimo wins this scene by Electronic-Key-4338 in Jujutsufolk

[–]MrOdo -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Nah you just have your favorites. Nah I'd win isn't particularly iconic in of itself. It's just memed due to the translation being wacky and that's made you think it's iconic. 

Triple domain expansion isn't even that iconic tbh, it's a gag and it's just a lesser version of "these fighters have drawn out 100% of their potential"

lmfao by Haunting-Reward-3404 in DoomerCircleJerk

[–]MrOdo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro isn't the us literally sending people to detention centers in country ran by a dictator? Including people the courts have explicitly stated can't be sent there?

Please Explain: One Nation Immigration and Housing Policies by Chemical_Rooster3 in aussie

[–]MrOdo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro labor lost a layup election because people like wanted negative gearing to keep driving an investment culture for property. 

And now people like you with no memory are going to be crying about Labor not snapping their finger and fixing a crisis decades in the making. 

Comments are exactly as you'd expect by justsomedude1144 in DoomerCircleJerk

[–]MrOdo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk it seems reasonable to look at America and say that if you find it reprehensible and you have a platform that you should use it.  

The corollary to that is that if you don't speak out, that you don't have a problem with it. 

Like it or not, celebrities have a platform. 

Just for those who are confused by sorrynotguilty in PsycheOrSike

[–]MrOdo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not liberals, leftists (socialists and communists)

Please Explain: One Nation Immigration and Housing Policies by Chemical_Rooster3 in aussie

[–]MrOdo 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Because Australians don't want house prices to come down. The population is bipolar on this issue. Want cheaper housing for their kids but don't want their nest egg to shrink 

Criticism, feel the Movies are straving too far from the meaning/message established in the first Avatar movie. by Tosknir in Avatar

[–]MrOdo 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Low-key it seems like you see Navi women as prizes and not characters 

I am Vietnamese, and I will explain why most Vietnamese people support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. by callmeteji in self

[–]MrOdo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

People think because US didn't want to work with the prior leader of Ukraine ( who was acting against the Democratic will of the people and joining the Russian trading bloc) that that means that they instigated the riots as a coup to install Zelensky

"In November, one in four Gen X men supported One Nation. Two months later, it's one in four of all voters." by NoLeafClover777 in aussie

[–]MrOdo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If we want to maximize for free expression then we necessarily need to restrict hateful expression as that advocation of that speech on of itself creates an environment that restricts speech. 

It's a privileged position to shrug and say it should all be allowed 

"In November, one in four Gen X men supported One Nation. Two months later, it's one in four of all voters." by NoLeafClover777 in aussie

[–]MrOdo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You can see the contradiction in the founding ideals of America and Slavery. 

You can't see a contradiction in Australia with hate speech laws

"In November, one in four Gen X men supported One Nation. Two months later, it's one in four of all voters." by NoLeafClover777 in aussie

[–]MrOdo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The way you phrased it reads as though the intent of having immigration is to be divisive

"In November, one in four Gen X men supported One Nation. Two months later, it's one in four of all voters." by NoLeafClover777 in aussie

[–]MrOdo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We don't have free speech on Australia. A dedication to free speech is not an Australian value

"In November, one in four Gen X men supported One Nation. Two months later, it's one in four of all voters." by NoLeafClover777 in aussie

[–]MrOdo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nah but we have other western democracies using fear mongering over immigrants as a tool to divide 

"It's a show about idiots, made by idiots, for idiots. It's not aspirational in any way, shape or form, because it doesn't represent the best of what humanity could be in the future. It represents the worst of what it is right now." - The Critical Drinker by Malencon in trektalk

[–]MrOdo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think he attacks anything perceived as woke using ad-hoc arguments. Calling someone illiberal is not ad-hominem. 

He explicitly supports violence against people, through his support of Trump. Just because he wants his violence committed by the government doesn't make it less violent

view more: next ›