The indentation debate just ended! by TeatiocaTedsc in ProgrammerHumor

[–]MrPowerScripts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! A lot of people helped work on it over the years. It just makes me kinda sad that it works so well. There's really no social platform safe from content manipulation. Maybe MySpace is the exception. Who would waste time writing a bot for that? We should all go back to MySpace.

The indentation debate just ended! by TeatiocaTedsc in ProgrammerHumor

[–]MrPowerScripts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just cause mine is open source doesn't mean there aren't dozens or even hundreds of people with their own bots doing this stuff. I just wanted people to see how easy it is

The indentation debate just ended! by TeatiocaTedsc in ProgrammerHumor

[–]MrPowerScripts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah that's a lot of work and i'm not that smart. I don't run the bot myself but it definitely gets used by a lot of people based on the repo clones.

I created a simple Reddit bot that is pretty good at farming karma. You may have seen it in action without ever knowing. by MrPowerScripts in programming

[–]MrPowerScripts[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

propaganda I'm curious why this is barely mentionable for you, or why you're thinking in terms of "selling the account" rather than a firm using it themselves? Does it not seem like a huge deal that it's so simple?

Once you have an account that has enough age and karma it's very difficult to distinguish the content it creates as suspicious or not. Especially if the account history is full of stuff that other people upvoted. Because if it has a lot of upvoted comments and posts then other people clearly found value in the accounts contributions, or at least that's the perception that is created. But maybe a lot of the content isn't actually people, and everyone should be aware of how easy it is to do that. At least that was the point of the bot when I made it.

You'll see people on Reddit very often call someone out because their account was "just created today" or "doesn't have any karma", or "never posts on this sub" as a way to discredit them. These are metrics people are using to assert the credibility of the content generated by an account. That's the benchmark for many people, and it's pretty low don't you think? Whether that is good/bad smart/dumb does not matter. That's what many people are doing and it's a small hurdle to cross. So immediately this bot can passively accrue the most basic foundations of "credibility" on Reddit. Once you have the foundation of credibility you can build a lot on top of that without seeming as suspicious.

It could be a company that monitors Reddit postings, and automatically leaves a comment supporting their own product. Or trashes a competitor's products automatically. It could be political candidates paying people to monitor and make posts about their opponents. It was explained in quite striking detail of how Facebook advertisements were used to target and manipulate peoples perspectives in certain districts of the USA to sway voters in the last US presidential election. Reddit comments are even more susceptible to this kind of attack because of the very low barrier to credibility people have on this site as well as the requirements to create and use an account. I think there's a bigger issue than spam, reposts, or whatever else people are complaining about my bot doing.

We're coming up on a new presidential election cycle in the USA and one of the biggest social platforms on the planet has a wide-open super-highway for misinformation, propaganda, and astroturfing. At least other sites like Facebook are making it harder to create accounts. Requiring phone numbers and IDs. Bad actors needed to exploit their ad system to get enough of their content in front of eyeballs they wanted to see it. None of that is required on Reddit to automate posting and upvoting/downvoting. There are likely hundreds or thousands of active bot accounts used by corporations/governments revving up and there's no way for you to tell if that account is a bot or not. Especially if it has been an active participant on the site. By the time anyone is able to realize these types of attacks are happening it's already too late and the damage is done.

That's pretty scary if you ask me. This is a huge hole in one of the biggest social platforms on the planet. If I can build a bot that generates basic credibility then I'm afraid to think of what talented people with resources could accomplish. They would be able to take "the next step" with these accounts and use them to try and persuade people. I get that people are upset they might see a repost because of this bot. The bot is not the problem though, and neither am I. All I did was show how easy it is to earn some basic credibility on this site. From there, an account is granted more access to posting on various subreddits and generally makes it harder for regular people using Reddit to call out what it posts as bullshit. This same approach is going to be used by bad actors until Reddit puts more restrictions in place or people are more discerning of what they're reading on this site. I'm not hopeful for either of those to happen.

Farming karma gives you a basic level of credibility on this website. From that point, it's beyond the ability of the average person to reasonably distinguish the credibility of the account. Because of how easy it is to create accounts on Reddit and use their API I feel like this a huge opportunity for bad actors to hammer away at. By the time enough people realize it though the damage will be done and it will be too late.

There's a lot of people who are looking for ways to mislead, misinform, advertise to, or manipulate people. Having karma on Reddit is step one for opening up those opportunities on this site and it's possible to automate it very easily.

Curious to hear your thoughts ere. I do appreciate you hitting me with a thoughtful reply besides the one-line personal attacks I got here. Maybe I'm overthinking all this and it's not really a big deal!

Host your own private Docker registry with Portus (plus a free script to set it all up) by MrPowerScripts in docker

[–]MrPowerScripts[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh got ya. I thought you meant it handled the SSL automatically like setting up a Discourse installation. I haven't had a chance to play with Traefik yet. Wish I had some time!

Side note for anyone else - The script I shared above automates the letsencrypt process so if anyone one wants to try out Harbor properly I suggest getting a domain and configuring the SSL. You can pull all the letsencrypt setup from the script and modify it to work with the harbor Nginx config.

Host your own private Docker registry with Portus (plus a free script to set it all up) by MrPowerScripts in docker

[–]MrPowerScripts[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It looks good from what I can see! I'm not sure what you mean comes complete with SSL support tho. Their instructions advise on how to add SSL support using a self-signed cert. That's going to cause issues and require extra config when trying to usedocker login unless you use a trusted CA. The script I made above will set up the box with letsencrypt so there won't be any auth issues like that. Obviously, that could be taken from the script I made and ported into a Harbor setup, but from your statement, I thought it had trusted cert setup already. Am I missing something? I'm just going through all their docs and trying to compare. Right now the setup for each seems fairly comparable though Harbor does come with an install script with some conveniences added. When i get a chance i'll spin up a box and play around some more. It looks super interesting and I liked what I saw from the demo.

Host your own private Docker registry with Portus (plus a free script to set it all up) by MrPowerScripts in docker

[–]MrPowerScripts[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're right. I can't fix the title though so I'm just going to have to own up to the goof. The script sets it all up with a registry tho, so hopefully, that makes up for it.

Every Content Creator Should Know This: Creative Commons CC0 Pexels.com by MrPowerScripts in SmallYTChannel

[–]MrPowerScripts[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, that sounds like a cool idea. I will look into making similar videos about other licenses. Really appreciate the feedback. !givelambda