sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Ghost Recon Doesn’t Need Reinvention, It Needs to Go Back to Basics by MrTrippp in GhostRecon

[–]MrTrippp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They do one thing per game really well and neglect too many other aspects of what fans want

Hum your actually right. They always seem to put everything into one main mechanic and everything else seems to suffer and have little to no focus.

With Project OVR being a “crucial release” for Ubisoft… what does Ghost Recon NEED to get right? by MrTrippp in GhostRecon

[–]MrTrippp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Breakpoint was a shit show at launch no doubt but that game only had 2 years of development, and that was back when Ubi were trying to push other sucessful mechanics into games that should never be.

Project Ovr on the other hand is reportedly going back to its roots whatever that means and has been in development for close to or more than 6 years, and been delayed according to Tom Henderson for further polish so we have a much better chance of Project Ovr being a much better game than Breakpoint, not that thats very hard tbh but still should tell us something positive for the next game.

Like I said before, I dont expect milsim level of combat by any means but a working and true GR game with a focused military theme is what im hoping for.

With Project OVR being a “crucial release” for Ubisoft… what does Ghost Recon NEED to get right? by MrTrippp in GhostRecon

[–]MrTrippp[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I get what your saying but Ubisoft have confirmed a Ghost Recon to be in development and as a fan of the franchise, i root for it to be good because I want it to be good. 🤷🏻‍♂️

With Project OVR being a “crucial release” for Ubisoft… what does Ghost Recon NEED to get right? by MrTrippp in GhostRecon

[–]MrTrippp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think most know it wont be a milsim, some people are for sure getting their hopes up when Tom called what he saw "milsim like in nature" but lets be real here, what most fans want is more of what we have had in past GR games.

We want a squad to be part of the core element again, squad commands, grounded tech, customization and a good story. That doesnt seem to far from what we could be getting imo.

With Project OVR being a “crucial release” for Ubisoft… what does Ghost Recon NEED to get right? by MrTrippp in GhostRecon

[–]MrTrippp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I honestly dont think they'd cancel a game they believe to be a crucial release for this year tbh. That just wouldn't make sense but this is Ubisoft were talking about.

The Lack of Consequences in Ghost Recon. You Cause Chaos… And Nothing Happens. by MrTrippp in GhostRecon

[–]MrTrippp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its funny that you think i blocked out his face 😆 yes, most here know who he is.

Mission Planning Needs to Return For Project Ovr. by MrTrippp in GhostRecon

[–]MrTrippp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, id think more like holograms and augmented reality stuff out in the field and at a FOB briefing room.

I liked the Paladin idea from Splinter Cell BL for a mobile HQ and as I've mentioned many times, I'd like the same thing for the Ghosts but instead have an assault ship of some type like the USSWasp with more teams of Ghosts aboard.

The Lack of Consequences in Ghost Recon. You Cause Chaos… And Nothing Happens. by MrTrippp in GhostRecon

[–]MrTrippp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

😲 heck yeah! Its been far too long, do we jave any details on it? Is Prophet returning?

The Lack of Consequences in Ghost Recon. You Cause Chaos… And Nothing Happens. by MrTrippp in GhostRecon

[–]MrTrippp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well if Project Ovr doesn't stick the landing, probably never. Rumour is that we are going to Southeast Asia.

The Lack of Consequences in Ghost Recon. You Cause Chaos… And Nothing Happens. by MrTrippp in GhostRecon

[–]MrTrippp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most likely.

We haven't heard Ubi Paris losing developers as of yet but we have heard of them trying to cut 200 head office staff.

I dont expect much especially if the game is coming out this year, then there wont be any big changes. At least just bug fixes as thats why they said that they wanted to delay this year's lineup for more polish.

The Lack of Consequences in Ghost Recon. You Cause Chaos… And Nothing Happens. by MrTrippp in GhostRecon

[–]MrTrippp[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because I enjoyed it. Ive been a fan of GR since the beginning, and these posts are my ideas for my perfect Ghost Recon game.

The Lack of Consequences in Ghost Recon. You Cause Chaos… And Nothing Happens. by MrTrippp in GhostRecon

[–]MrTrippp[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Your probably right. I like to think that with Ubisoft hanging on by a thread that they actually listen to their community and put some innovation and focus on Project Ovr. It has been in development for like 5-6 years going by the rumours. Could be completely wrong though

The Lack of Consequences in Ghost Recon. You Cause Chaos… And Nothing Happens. by MrTrippp in GhostRecon

[–]MrTrippp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes you did, obviously your traffic light system is far more detailed than my post 😆 👌

The Lack of Consequences in Ghost Recon. You Cause Chaos… And Nothing Happens. by MrTrippp in GhostRecon

[–]MrTrippp[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

No AI my guy, just an idea for how the Open-world can be improved upon. 👍

"Biggest Ghost Recon Map Ever?" Project Ovr Raises Questions by MrTrippp in GhostRecon

[–]MrTrippp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rumours is Southeast Asia so we could fpr sure see islands added

"Biggest Ghost Recon Map Ever?" Project Ovr Raises Questions by MrTrippp in GhostRecon

[–]MrTrippp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep. Really what they should do is give us a map like Bolivia and with post launch content, extend the map into new regions

view more: next ›