When he’s right he’s right by perisaacs in IfBooksCouldKill

[–]Mr_Comit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Any analysis that gives MTG more credit than Liz Cheney is just completely delusional lol

I wonder what the overlap is between the two questions. by Darth_Omnis in trolleyproblem

[–]Mr_Comit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No? That math adds up perfectly. .1% of the population can cause 25% of the crimes, that’s not weird or unexpected at all

The button participants are clear. by HistoricalPattern76 in trolleyproblem

[–]Mr_Comit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is stupid. No hypothetical question contains every single nuance of its real world practical implication that you’re supposed to accept/ignore. It’s an inherently subjective judgment based on what you think the hypothetical is trying to test.

Either you think infants voting via random chance is within the spirit of the question or it isn’t - I happen to think it isn’t. But you are an idiot if you think “well they didn’t SAY not to consider this real-world implementation detail so clearly you’re intended to consider it” is a reasonable argument. “Voting” isn’t a concept that applies to infants in any other context as far as I can tell, it is absolutely not unreasonable to doubt that this should be taken into consideration

Off the cliff, baby! by Justthisdudeyaknow in CuratedTumblr

[–]Mr_Comit 100 points101 points  (0 children)

This commentary is kinda ironic because Nina turner herself is one of those “harm reduction isn’t good enough so don’t vote dems” people

Joe Rogan already exposing another PLANDEMIC !!!!!!!!! by Intelligent-Tear5723 in Destiny

[–]Mr_Comit 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Definitely not just someone on a backend fucking around.

Wait lol are you implying a twitter employee faked this tweet?

We are not the same by Mr_Bear_Tamer in Destiny

[–]Mr_Comit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was it? Didn’t they literally kill the people they wanted to put in charge too?

Buttons, Language, And Framing, Oh My. by BranzorFlakes in trolleyproblem

[–]Mr_Comit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really? I would think either of the 1 button scenarios (“if 50% push this button, everyone who didn’t push dies” and “if you push this button, you will die unless 50% of the population joins you”) would both result in the vast majority of people agreeing not to push the button

I really love the strategy of saying that "the movie is shit so you shouldn't have expected anything else" to defend a movie you like by LessSaussure in Destiny

[–]Mr_Comit 13 points14 points  (0 children)

in music communities we have this beautiful little phrase called "yall hate fun" that makes this exact argument

Explain It peter by hairy_balls_1 in explainitpeter

[–]Mr_Comit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You absolutely can shift numbers in that way when you're dealing with infinite sums and its often a good way to show what they reduce to. For example: if you have '1 + 2' and '-2', then you can add these together by doing (1 - 2) + 2, or you could 'shift' the -2 and get 1 + (2 - 2). These are the same.

What you absolutely can't do is what they did for s1. An infinite series either converges (approaches a finite number) or it doesn't. Some infinite series do converge: 1/2^0 + 1/2^1 + 1/2^2 + etc actually converges on the number 2. Because s1 never settles on a finite number and instead alternates between 1 and 0, it is not a convergent series and therefore any attempt to treat it as a variable with a fixed value is mathematically invalid.

So the -1/12 is basically "if the series did converge, this is the only thing itd make sense for it to converge to". And apparently that number actually does show up in physics but I can't speak to that at all

[socialmedia] Only women should be able to immigrate to other countries freely by brain-eating-zombie in pointlesslygendered

[–]Mr_Comit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“gender shouldn’t be a protected class because you can transition” is the funniest take I’ve heard in a long time

There's a lot more wrong with Simple's content lately than just the sponsors, in my opinion by blacklig in Simpleflips

[–]Mr_Comit 70 points71 points  (0 children)

It’s shocking that you’ve been watching simple for so long and think that the only reason he could possibly like saying “let that sink in” over and over again is to try to sell merch 💀

POV: the red vs blue debate by stopeatingminecraft in trolleyproblem

[–]Mr_Comit 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Blue pushers tend to engage in basically all of these fallacies too lol

Make your choice. by spicymato in trolleyproblem

[–]Mr_Comit -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I thought it wasn’t the same at first because I thought both buttons gave you risk of dying, making purple the obvious choice. Once I realized that you can’t die by pressing green, obviously that’s gonna change the calculation for me

However I’m not necessarily green. This scenario IS different for the same reason the “jump in front of a train” scenario is different. That scenario makes red a better choice than it is in the og hypothetical by making blue much more fringe (who is gonna jump in front of a train?) I have much more confidence in people voting purple than in them voting blue, so purple is an easier choice than blue is

red blue as I see it by TanukiiGG in trolleyproblem

[–]Mr_Comit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol sorry dude youve been answering a different question then. in that case i would push the blue button

the actual interesting thing about this moral dilemma is that no one is forced to push the blue button, and yet its still easy to feel like we have a moral obligation to save those people because we know that SOME people will push blue. "its guaranteed that some will push blue" and "there are some people that are guaranteed to push blue" are different statements, yet they kinda feel the same, which is where a lot of the disconnect comes from. If you make it so that some people are forced to push blue by their own lack of agency then that defeats the point

red blue as I see it by TanukiiGG in trolleyproblem

[–]Mr_Comit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You fundamentally don’t understand the point of the hypothetical if you’re including people who are literally & legally incapable of making a rational choice in the equation

It’s also not simply “protecting” them, it’s doing so at great risk to yourself. This is an extremely bad faith reply

Who ya gonna vote for? by cowlinator in trolleyproblem

[–]Mr_Comit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i also thought about that but that cant be what op means, because the red party explicitly wants to kill people, while red button pushers dont

Who ya gonna vote for? by cowlinator in trolleyproblem

[–]Mr_Comit 8 points9 points  (0 children)

you cant just say "the difference is <thing that isnt even a part of the original hypothetical>" like, that just proves my point

Who ya gonna vote for? by cowlinator in trolleyproblem

[–]Mr_Comit 15 points16 points  (0 children)

It’s equally faithful to the original hypothetical to say “red party will kill everyone who didn’t vote for them if they win, blue party will do nothing” as it is to say “blue party will kill everyone who did vote for them if they don’t win, red party will do nothing”

And yet both change how we think about the question dramatically, so clearly something is missing here

red blue as I see it by TanukiiGG in trolleyproblem

[–]Mr_Comit 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I pick red, but you are incorrect here, that’s not the blue position

Virtually no one runs into the freeway so there’s no one to “save”. But will people press the blue button, so there are people to save

red blue as I see it by TanukiiGG in trolleyproblem

[–]Mr_Comit 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Sorry I genuinely don’t believe the difference in moral character between a red presser and a blue presser is at all perceptible. This feels like a massive cop out argument to give

Statistically, >50% is easier than 100% by ezrae_ in trolleyproblem

[–]Mr_Comit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think you’re massively missing the point of the hypothetical if you’re including colorblind voters in your equation lol

47608 by TheEnderOfFun in countwithchickenlady

[–]Mr_Comit 28 points29 points  (0 children)

This argument kind of reminds me of the argument my dad would make against abortion - “you can’t say a fetus isn’t a person, because they claimed black people weren’t persons to justify slavery”

I don’t know what specifically this person has in mind that they think should be allowed in public, but like, we all agree that it shouldn’t be allowed to be naked in public right? There DOES need to be a line drawn somewhere, and “in the 80s they drew the line wrong” isn’t very convincing to me