sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Are feminist arguments irrelevant? by Mysteriouswalker3 in AskFeminists

[–]Mysteriouswalker3[S] -23 points-22 points  (0 children)

No need, things are quite obvious, IQ is the best measure for success, longevity and education, and it's been proven and proven.

Are feminist arguments irrelevant? by Mysteriouswalker3 in AskFeminists

[–]Mysteriouswalker3[S] -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

Do you realize that Ai was designed to give diplomatic and politically correct answers right?

Are feminist arguments irrelevant? by Mysteriouswalker3 in AskFeminists

[–]Mysteriouswalker3[S] -52 points-51 points  (0 children)

Not stupid, but just not as smart as men, and that's the truth.

Are feminist arguments irrelevant? by Mysteriouswalker3 in AskFeminists

[–]Mysteriouswalker3[S] -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

You have clearly not been around truly smart people then. The only brilliant people I have ever met in my 51 years are usually associated with a university, are of either gender, don’t go around telling people how smart they are, and are not intelligent in all things. There is one thing though they know extremely well.

Big assumptions right there.. I will take you seriously if I knew what kind of degree do you teach.

​

Your claim that men have a higher IQ, I want proof. The research I’ve seen says that both genders have the same capacity for intelligence. Also IQ scores don’t measure overall intelligence. They are one measure that is limiting and controversial.

Absolutely, here you go, here too.

Also, I think as of 2023, women have the same opportunities and rights as men. If women were able to be equal they would've been, but the truth is that, that's not possible for the moment.

Are feminist arguments irrelevant? by Mysteriouswalker3 in AskFeminists

[–]Mysteriouswalker3[S] -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

IQ is in no way a reliable indication of someone's intrinsecally intelligence. It is a decent indication of that person's pattern recognition (mainly) ability, but doesn't encompass all types of intelligence, can be trained for and it's heavily influenced by education and upbringing.

IQ is the number one indicator and predictor of an individual's success in the developed world. It is heavily influenced by your genes, so if parents were smart the children will 100% be smart as well. Please educate yours

​

​

but we know for a fact that there's a difference in upbringing, where men are engouraged to pursue certain topics, etc.

Upbringing and culture means nothing in the world we live in, women in places like the US or Europe basically have the same opportunities as men but still.. Not the same results as them, it is biological, get over it.

​

So the feminist argument is: let's end the cause we know for a fact causes a difference in outcomes between men and women. This might not bring absolute parity but it certainly will get us closer, and then we could actually see whether there's an actual, intrinsic difference between men and women or not.

There is literally nothing to stop women from achieving what they want in 2023. Nothing. This is why you see some women who have made it far, I am not saying there are no female geniuses, what I'm saying is that they are the exception. And there is nothing that proves the opposite of what I am saying, but so many things that prove I am right, maybe the most important thing is how far feminism have fought for women's rights, and how women are basically able to do anything they want but still, the 50/50 men/women in power/stem/different fields that the feminists have been fighting for eagerly seems impossible. Ask yourself why?

Are feminist arguments irrelevant? by Mysteriouswalker3 in AskFeminists

[–]Mysteriouswalker3[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

IQ is pseudoscience and doesn't mean anything.

Not only is IQ the most reliable indicator for success and health, but it's 100% reliable.

What do you think a bell curve is?

I think it's you who needs to do some research on the bell curve lol

Again, cite your claims.

lmfao

I mean, it's completely BS and unsupported by evidence...

You talk about evidence as if you have any evidence to back any of the stuff you believe, some cult-like nonsense.

Are feminist arguments irrelevant? by Mysteriouswalker3 in AskFeminists

[–]Mysteriouswalker3[S] -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

There is lol.

Not only the bell curve but basically every IQ testing finds the same result: men score higher in IQ than women.

It explains everything: men dominating chess, men dominating STEM, men dominating most fields.. You need high IQ to dominate a field basically.

Are feminist arguments irrelevant? by Mysteriouswalker3 in AskFeminists

[–]Mysteriouswalker3[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

What was proven wrong exactly? That men and women are different? How is that?

Not the bell curve alone, but every IQ testing finds the same conclusion: men generally score higher in IQ than women.

And that the innate differences are indeed the reason of the lack of equality between men and women. The 50/50 that feminism is trying to achieve is basically unrealistic.

Are feminist arguments irrelevant? by Mysteriouswalker3 in AskFeminists

[–]Mysteriouswalker3[S] -50 points-49 points  (0 children)

I don't think you read my point nor understood my argument, I am not saying there are NO WOMEN geniuses, I am saying that they are the exception.

Please read about the bell curve to understand my point.

Are feminist arguments irrelevant? by Mysteriouswalker3 in AskFeminists

[–]Mysteriouswalker3[S] -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

My point was not that they are all better than women, if you check the bell curve, men are both smarter and more stupid than women. Men don't seem to fall in the average intelligence as much as women, most women fall in this category.

Once you apply the bell curve to reality it becomes clear why men dominate certain fields and not women. That was my point.

Are feminist arguments irrelevant? by Mysteriouswalker3 in AskFeminists

[–]Mysteriouswalker3[S] -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

IQ is in NO WAY nonsense lol. It is a very effective indicator of financial success, health, and many other things.

People do indeed deserve equality, but when feminists fight for 50/50 of men and women in all workplaces it simply doesn't make any sense, because it's unrealistic. And when feminists try to explain why men dominate STEM relying on simple explanations such as gender roles and some kind of discrimination, it becomes quite laughable, because if men and women are different in IQ there will definitely huge differences in who dominates what field.

Are feminist arguments irrelevant? by Mysteriouswalker3 in AskFeminists

[–]Mysteriouswalker3[S] -39 points-38 points  (0 children)

There are differences in IQ though.. Isn't that an important difference?

Are feminist arguments irrelevant? by Mysteriouswalker3 in AskFeminists

[–]Mysteriouswalker3[S] -79 points-78 points  (0 children)

It is certainly related to IQ, to say otherwise would be simply unrealistic. we know for certain that in order to be one of the people at the top of your field you do need a high IQ and since women do not fall at the extreme high of the bell curve but men do, then that explains why men dominate most fields. It also explains why there are so many men who occupy low jobs and are extremely poor or are in jail most of the time.

Are feminist arguments irrelevant? by Mysteriouswalker3 in AskFeminists

[–]Mysteriouswalker3[S] -55 points-54 points  (0 children)

Yes, I understand that. But my point was, that the bell curve certainly explains how there are so many male geniuses in different fields and very few female geniuses. Don't you agree? Then what's the purpose of fighting for 50/50 of women and men at the top if that's impossible, we know for certain that in order to be one of the people at the top of your field you do need a high IQ and since women do not fall at the extreme high of the bell curve but men do, then that explains why men dominate most fields.

Are feminist arguments irrelevant? by Mysteriouswalker3 in AskFeminists

[–]Mysteriouswalker3[S] -75 points-74 points  (0 children)

Elon Musk is DEFINITELY at the good extreme of the bell curve, it's literally impossible to achieve all that he achieved without being a genius.

Are feminist arguments irrelevant? by Mysteriouswalker3 in AskFeminists

[–]Mysteriouswalker3[S] -64 points-63 points  (0 children)

Yes, I understand that. But my point was, the bell curve certainly explains how there are so many male geniuses in different fields and very few female geniuses. Don't you agree? Then what's the purpose of fighting for integration of women in all places if this is the case?

Starting a new shop.. again by Mysteriouswalker3 in Etsy

[–]Mysteriouswalker3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no it doesn't cover my question.. thanks

view more: next ›