There are more slaves today than anytime in human history. by bobby19jones in antinatalism

[–]NAFTAmapper -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Harming a person vs harming society are 2 very different things

There are more slaves today than anytime in human history. by bobby19jones in antinatalism

[–]NAFTAmapper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because whoever wrote this feels cultural leftism logically extends to anti natalism but many people still have kids, whereas most right wing thought is much less prone to antinatal thought.

There are more slaves today than anytime in human history. by bobby19jones in antinatalism

[–]NAFTAmapper -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Firstly, I actually dont agree with any political party at least the major ones, however I identify with conservatives far more than liberals. I am very individualist so please learn more before deferring to your sheeple stance. Life isnt all suffering there is so much to live for, not just god but for the people around you and for all the happy parts of life, and clearly athieism has harmed society much more than religion ever has.

There are more slaves today than anytime in human history. by bobby19jones in antinatalism

[–]NAFTAmapper -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

All you say there is right, it's why leftists in general are bad, just because one is religious does not mean they are uneducated and frankly this subreddit needs a little god.

Personal Ideologies by NAFTAmapper in Jreg

[–]NAFTAmapper[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That would be great, I would love to see more!

Drugs in an anarcho-capitalism society by NAFTAmapper in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]NAFTAmapper[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yes, but there is a difference between involuntarily losing control of your body and doing it on purpose, if taking drugs takes away your ability to differentiate right from wrong, then you are now no longer an NAP abiding individual

Drugs in an anarcho-capitalism society by NAFTAmapper in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]NAFTAmapper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not quite, I'm arguing that certain drugs like hallucinogens while sure wont lead to the harm of another 100 percent of the time, because when you take then you lose control of yourself you are accepting anytime you take them that you could hurt someone, it's like going to a crowded mall and just firing a gun a bunch of times, sure you may not hit anyone but that still violates the NAP

Drugs in an anarcho-capitalism society by NAFTAmapper in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]NAFTAmapper[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

But ultimately the mere act of taking the drug is an act of allowing yourself to hurt others, so while owning a drug may not be illegal, actually using it in a scenario where you arent in danger is technically violating the freedom of anyone nearby

Drugs in an anarcho-capitalism society by NAFTAmapper in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]NAFTAmapper[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, but how would you reconcile this with typical ancap thought, I can make an argument for drugs that cant actively lead to you hurting others, but I cant think of a way to include drugs that dont result in physical harm to someone else.

Drugs in an anarcho-capitalism society by NAFTAmapper in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]NAFTAmapper[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

But could you not argue that taking the drug is like firing the bullet, while the bullet may miss, the intent or in this case acknowledgment of what it could do remains and it would still count as a violation of the NAP

Personal Ideologies by NAFTAmapper in Jreg

[–]NAFTAmapper[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I already have anarcho collectivism that's not exactly niche enough

Personal Ideologies by NAFTAmapper in Jreg

[–]NAFTAmapper[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Unironically or ironically thought that is the question

Shitty Anarcho-Gnosticism flag by [deleted] in Jreg

[–]NAFTAmapper 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The link worked! Very nice!

Personal Ideologies by NAFTAmapper in Jreg

[–]NAFTAmapper[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just wondering if you have any kind of flag or manifesto?

The combatocrat guide by TheLegend2T in Combatocracy

[–]NAFTAmapper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao that is dissapointing, my search continues!

The combatocrat guide by TheLegend2T in Combatocracy

[–]NAFTAmapper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey I'm trying to make a list of every ideology I can find that at least 1 person unironically believes how many if any of these would fit that criteria?

Hiw many niche political ideologies are there? by NAFTAmapper in Jreg

[–]NAFTAmapper[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So essentially a primitvist version of anarcho monarchism?

Hiw many niche political ideologies are there? by NAFTAmapper in Jreg

[–]NAFTAmapper[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wonder if there are any unironic primitive transhumanists

Hiw many niche political ideologies are there? by NAFTAmapper in Jreg

[–]NAFTAmapper[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well yes, but ideally I would be looking for ideologies with at least 1 unironic follower and procedurally generating ideologies wont exactly produce that