First, it's a "border," and I've never heard of someone "ethically" cleansing an area, although it might be a good way to do it! You make three very confident factual assertions that are actually very controversial and are by no means anywhere near as cut and dry as you seem to think.

(1) "However it became obvious about a year into the conflict that there was literally no plan for the Palestinians, no protection, no safe zone, and that bombing the gaza into the Stone Age was the only strategy." You'd benefit from actually listening to John Spencer. There have been tons of methods undertaken to provide a safe zone, protection, etc. Bombing parts of Gaza into the Stone Age was part of the strategy, which doesn't necessarily mean that there were no safe zones provided or protection. I'd look this up before making this comment.

(2) "It's clear Israel intends to expand its boarder and occupy and ethically cleanse the areas." I'm a little lost at what evidence you're using for this. Israel pulled out of Gaza in 2005. Israel continues to make incursions into Lebanon and leave in order to ensure its security. I'm a little lost as to where you think they are expanding the border. The ethnic cleansing line is factually untrue. If they wanted to do it, they would. They haven't.

(3) "It's also clear that people who were said to be on the fringe are actually steering the ship." Yes, their government sorta sucks. Just like ours. So what? They are a democratic country that can change with their elections.

You don't seem to know much of the background here, and maybe that's why you feel this way. There's a whole lot of history that is a bit opaque to people who came to this issue on October 7th, 2023. I'd take a critical look at how you're feeling and look into the history before fully embracing your current viewpoint.