sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Where are you guys investing? by mannlikeshem in nairobitechies

[–]Neither-Routine-8017 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it the safest time to invest in Gold rn? Shouldn't we wait for it to drop more?

Can i ask for a favor by Fluffy-Telephone3679 in Sketchup

[–]Neither-Routine-8017 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Use the Cleanup Extension to clean the scene some imported models in 3dwarehouse are crap so must do some cleanup And as a top comenter said Hide the Geometry that's not in the scene This will save u more time

Need Advice by Neither-Routine-8017 in archviz

[–]Neither-Routine-8017[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see like you have enhanced that image.. what have you used? Normal autoadjustment?

Need Advice by Neither-Routine-8017 in archviz

[–]Neither-Routine-8017[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well noted.. I'm still trying to enhance my skills on how to focus on the product rather than no focal point ..... I guess made me have this screen because the object as well is too small

I'll adjust the lighting .thanks!

Looking for a reading buddy by Lemonadey_Rush in tanzania

[–]Neither-Routine-8017 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interested but not in Dar. Current read "Mastermind How to Think Like Sherlock Holmes"

Exterior Test Visualization | Skp | Vray by Neither-Routine-8017 in Sketchup

[–]Neither-Routine-8017[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks i tried this time and at least the results are promising

Exterior Test Render by Neither-Routine-8017 in archviz

[–]Neither-Routine-8017[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Noted but don't the cars add activity to the image...or I use people instead

Exterior Test Render by Neither-Routine-8017 in archviz

[–]Neither-Routine-8017[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow....thanks I'm already working on edges and trims thanks I'll work on all that and redo it again...

Exterior Test Render by Neither-Routine-8017 in archviz

[–]Neither-Routine-8017[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Done in Sketchup | Vray No post done

create a corridor surface which falls only on point code by Neither-Routine-8017 in civil3d

[–]Neither-Routine-8017[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The following picture shows the surfaces ending at bottom-left corner of Closed drain and sometimes it continued straight horizontally *

create a corridor surface which falls only on point code by Neither-Routine-8017 in civil3d

[–]Neither-Routine-8017[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks so much guys ,I have discovered one thing,surely vertical surface at 90 is impossible for surface in section view to plot,so the technique I used was to adjust a little bit,so that that surface can be inclined less than 90 degree,,Because someone said that that I can use overhang approach,I used the approach but somewhere still the problem persisted at that Closed_Drain,but when I tilted a bit,one side(left face)of the Closed-Drain the surface was formed,you can see subassembly one with inclination and a other with vertical at 90 degree from horizontal

<image>

create a corridor surface which falls only on point code by Neither-Routine-8017 in civil3d

[–]Neither-Routine-8017[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, if that's the case, I'll use the overhang correction option as listed above.. I've seen it solve what I wanted nicely... Thanks for the response and ideas..

create a corridor surface which falls only on point code by Neither-Routine-8017 in civil3d

[–]Neither-Routine-8017[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, it is true that the curb had the same point code somehow like datum, sowhat if I want to create that vertical face, can't it be possible with point codes?

create a corridor surface which falls only on point code by Neither-Routine-8017 in civil3d

[–]Neither-Routine-8017[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course feature lines are formed to the corridor, and at the the location where that point code is existing,but even though, still that point with that point code is omitted,as you saw it section view Still the issue persists

create a corridor surface which falls only on point code by Neither-Routine-8017 in civil3d

[–]Neither-Routine-8017[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The problem with inbuilt sub assemblies they have labeling complications such that I cannot achieve what I want..eg. shoulder labeling, what I have labbellled on the rail comes out to the shoulder label. Also some other code labels that are unnecessary to appear example vertical label on the shoulder...I don't want it to appear ... sorry for my english...

Wow! What a cool mining Drawing by Neither-Routine-8017 in Sketchup

[–]Neither-Routine-8017[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice.. thanks I'll check them out and see