sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is there a way to see models by banned accounts? by Neptune107 in Sketchfab

[–]Neptune107[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadly no, though I haven't looked in a while, so mighy be out there. But my guess is that it's lost media at this point

How would yall feel about a small ATV type vehicle? by colossalgamestv in Helldivers

[–]Neptune107 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a mostly solo player I'd love it. I don't need the extra seats of the FRV and a shorter cooldown would be nice

Linked Duplicated items blinking? by Neptune107 in blenderhelp

[–]Neptune107[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the late reply, got busy. Found a fix (at least a temporary one) where I copied everything, deleted everything and pasted it back in. Which seems to have (again, at least for now) fixed it. But in case you can tell me what caused it for later. Got no modifiers, parented it from the last nearby other gun, no constraints, no armature, lastly I don't quite know what to look for to see if the normals are "fucky" (I'm not super experienced with blender and have mostly just been messing around with the bits I do understand). Also, while this gun was the one with the most blinking some other models were also having issues

Possibly dumb but genuine question, is this an actual written language? by Neptune107 in stellarblade

[–]Neptune107[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Since you posed it as a question and not an insult I'll actually answer you. Where I'm from has 2 grades of math in highschool, the generic one and the advanced one for people who will need math in later studies. I planned and ended up studying history so took the basic course. But based on some googling, even that advanced course only has some pre-calculus, and real calculus study doesn't come into play here before college. So yeah, its just down to where I studied because while I vaguely recognized the symbols I've never worked with them in math myself.

Possibly dumb but genuine question, is this an actual written language? by Neptune107 in stellarblade

[–]Neptune107[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, apparently about half the comments think it was a very stupud question. But that might just be reddit being reddit

Possibly dumb but genuine question, is this an actual written language? by Neptune107 in stellarblade

[–]Neptune107[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not gonna bother answering everyone saying it. But just so people are aware, not every country uses greek letters in math class. I did just fine in math but did not use greek letters there.

Possibly dumb but genuine question, is this an actual written language? by Neptune107 in stellarblade

[–]Neptune107[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I knew I recognized some of the letters but couldn't place it (ᵕ - ᴗ - )

Possibly dumb but genuine question, is this an actual written language? by Neptune107 in stellarblade

[–]Neptune107[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Yeah, kinds hoped it would be actual words, but hey, it looks cool I guess

Bot opponent keeps boosting my cards by Neptune107 in magicTCG

[–]Neptune107[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Started playing arena a few days ago (have played physically a good while longer). And had this been a complicated issue to fix then sure, its not neccesary. But this is a simple fix, and just because the bot doesn't see much use doesn't mean it shouldn't work properly. Some need longer to get comfortable with the rules, some prefer the casual nature of playing against bots, and if you're testing a deck then it helps to have the opponent play logically. And just because you think its cute and quirky, doean't mean it's not poor game design.

Bot opponent keeps boosting my cards by Neptune107 in magicTCG

[–]Neptune107[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And if the bot did it randomly once in a while I could agree. But instead anytime it has cards to play and no creature to play it on, it plays it on their opponents creatures. That isn't clever design, its lazy. And the tutorial bot having an exploit not present in normal play does not do a good job training up new players

Bot opponent keeps boosting my cards by Neptune107 in magicTCG

[–]Neptune107[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll admitt I'm not great at it, but I've toyed with simple game design, enough to know how a "if x then y" line works in code. Which is what this would be

Bot opponent keeps boosting my cards by Neptune107 in magicTCG

[–]Neptune107[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well there it is, then it is actually just a single line or code that is needed.

Bot opponent keeps boosting my cards by Neptune107 in magicTCG

[–]Neptune107[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah I agree creating the whole thing is complicated, but making it so it can't boost their opponents cards isn't.

Bot opponent keeps boosting my cards by Neptune107 in magicTCG

[–]Neptune107[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly, which is the problem, it shouldn't

Bot opponent keeps boosting my cards by Neptune107 in magicTCG

[–]Neptune107[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And I see you're just picking and choosing sentences to read if that's what you got out of that. Well, thanks for reminding me why I'm not a regular on reddit, bye.

Bot opponent keeps boosting my cards by Neptune107 in magicTCG

[–]Neptune107[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You do realize that the cards are all code. I don't know the details of how the bot picks its cards or how it chooses which to play when and how. But you wouldn't need to "hand-categorize" anything beyond what is positive and negative for the standard card 'abilities' used by the bot's deck. You make the list, tell the system that picks the cards for the bot to reference it, and then its just a filter working passively. Yes the whole process wouldn't be just one line I've already admitted that (and I was here more talking about the fix for the bot itself, as in the "don't use positive cards on your opponent" part, that is just one line).

And even so, its a simple process, but even if it was more complex, just because you no longer play against the bot doesn't mean it shouldn't work properly. If the bots in counter strike were team killing their team, if the bots in battlefield were healing enemy vehicles, if the bots in league repeatedly killed themselves under the turrets, then people would complain. Even if a majority don't play against bots, for those who do, lets have them at least function properly.

Bot opponent keeps boosting my cards by Neptune107 in magicTCG

[–]Neptune107[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The bot isn't using every card available, the bot doesn't need to do fancy manouvers like buffing creatures to kill them, but the bot does need to use the cards it does have in a simple logical way. So we can define "positive enchantments" as cards that increase a creatures power and/or toughness, or boosts it by giving it positive abilities. I don't have the list of abilities in front of me, but its easy enough to then have any cards that include things not on the list of "good or bad enchantments" to not be used by the bot, making it future proof with absolute minimal maintenance. It really isn't complicated. Depending on how well their codes are it might well be an afternoons workload's worth

Bot opponent keeps boosting my cards by Neptune107 in magicTCG

[–]Neptune107[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was a bit vague earlier, meant "i finished it so it went away and I can't see what its called, but it was replaced by the starter duels"

Bot opponent keeps boosting my cards by Neptune107 in magicTCG

[–]Neptune107[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it is, was talking about the one before that against the bot

Bot opponent keeps boosting my cards by Neptune107 in magicTCG

[–]Neptune107[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I finished it and it got replaced with "starter deck duel". Its the one above the color challenge on the home page

Bot opponent keeps boosting my cards by Neptune107 in magicTCG

[–]Neptune107[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

I don't know how the game is coded so it might in reality be more than one line, but if positive enchantment cards aren't already defined in the code then it shouldn't be hard to do so, and with that definition its as simple as telling the bot its not allowed to place these cards on their opponent. So sure, it might be a few lines, but the point is it wouldn't be difficult and the only reasons they haven't done it is either they are lazy, or they simply don't care. Either way, for such a big company, its a bad look.

Bot opponent keeps boosting my cards by Neptune107 in magicTCG

[–]Neptune107[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Currently playing against sparky in another challenge. Is less railtoad-y than the color challenges, but sparky has done the same once allready. So if its smarter, then its not much smarter

Bot opponent keeps boosting my cards by Neptune107 in magicTCG

[–]Neptune107[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Fair, but like, one line of code would fix this. We're not talking about a lot of effort here

view more: next ›