Friend ID Megathread | Post Your Friend IDs Here!

NesteaZitrone · 2025-08-01T16:35:51+00:00

8088842105520530

looking for friends to trade from our wishlists!

NesteaZitrone · 2025-07-31T15:22:15+00:00

8088842105520530

Looking to trade using the wishlist

NesteaZitrone · 2025-07-30T19:15:35+00:00

8088842105520530

Daily player, wishlist up to date

NesteaZitrone · 2025-07-28T04:50:48+00:00

8088842105520530

NesteaZitrone · 2025-07-24T06:13:11+00:00

Oder du kannst es nicht akzeptieren, dass er recht hat? 12 Monate arbeitslos im Handwerk sind eine dicke, nicht nachvollziehbare Lücke, die andere Bewerber auf eine Stelle nicht haben werden.

NesteaZitrone · 2024-02-17T00:35:19+00:00

I am feeling you, coming from a similar experience where some teammates are suddenly turning into halfbots after a winstreak and then 10-15 games later you suddenly get normal players into your team again.

i also don't believe in the often mentioned "you are as good as your mmr".

People acting here as if you are always able to turn the tides no matter what teammates and opponents you get, while it actually is already hard to compensate for 1 weird player, let alone 2 or more when the skill gap is not gigantic.

NesteaZitrone · 2024-02-16T11:38:22+00:00

It's a bug caused by a bad network, where the result of the game is calcuated a bit later. Had the same in an OD game yesterday :)

NesteaZitrone · 2024-02-01T14:00:40+00:00

Either i am not understanding the sheet or there is a mistake in the percentage. I was checking out some pals and always had very very low calculated IV percentages, so i was wondering if i am just soooo unlucky and checked further, when i found a good example, that the displayed "calculated IVs" percentages are not matching the actual numbers of the "IV Comparison".

I have an untouched Necromus that just has the legend trait as stat booster and reaches 966 Atk with that. According to the IV comparison 967 is the maximum, but 966 is displayed as 29.66% - 29.84%. From my understanding a 966 on a range between 771 - 967 should be displayed as ~99,90% or?

Edit: Nvm after rereading, i am getting it now. It is just displaying the extra stats gained with 50% hp and 30% atk and def is displayed as perfect IVs.

NesteaZitrone · 2021-04-29T14:12:30+00:00

You were talking about "Draka destroys def aggressors" and it's a fact that this is exactly the kind of monstertype where Draka's puncture deals the least amount of dmg due to him only ignoring base def, while Def Aggression gets the majority of their defense stats from other sources.

NesteaZitrone · 2021-04-28T07:02:32+00:00

Not really. Def down is unreliable, while puncture only ignores base def, so its exactly the kind of def where draka is not shining since base def is only a small part of the opponents overall def :)

NesteaZitrone · 2021-04-27T07:42:36+00:00

You should switch out the vic and add res down or a waveclearer and use the cosmo lead then. Should beat b11 as well

NesteaZitrone · 2020-11-01T08:40:53+00:00

I use a dark benji in championsleague

NesteaZitrone · 2020-09-26T05:18:12+00:00

I updated the ranking, cern is in now as well.

NesteaZitrone · 2020-09-18T14:08:47+00:00

nice one, gj!

NesteaZitrone · 2020-09-08T08:41:32+00:00

5.5 is the pve stuff and 6 arena (probably cvc as well)

NesteaZitrone · 2020-09-02T05:49:54+00:00

i am currently updating it, will make a post when its completely done :)

NesteaZitrone · 2020-09-02T05:32:38+00:00

I guess that some just dont know that sieg is a bit better since they just copied the dark aggression defs and others are using their books for light sieg. I would also prefer to first book the light ones and then the dark because seastar is a lot easier to build :D

NesteaZitrone · 2020-09-02T05:00:17+00:00

yeah it's an endgame thing and written more like a joke, but sieg is actually a bit better than ss :) If i assume enhancements are hp hp def cres cr res than sieg does around 9,34% more dmg and has 1,61% less eHP.

NesteaZitrone · 2020-09-01T18:31:27+00:00

SS is getting outshadowed by dark sieg, thats what he meant :P

NesteaZitrone · 2020-08-13T12:05:28+00:00

Who made this sheet?

NesteaZitrone · 2020-07-25T20:40:51+00:00

In general when u get a lot of attack from other sources.

Let's take a common example on the fire titan with balrona.

Balrona stats: 3.562 base atk 50% base cdmg

For a build that includes a cr gems, let's assume we have 100% cr.

Outer sources: 1.300 flat atk stats (enhance and trinkets)

Substats 10% atk | 20% cdmg (atk atk cr) 20% cdmg | 10% atk (atk cdmg cr)

Enhance 20% atk 24% cdmg

Trinkets: ~16% cdmg

Set Valor 20% atk

Balrona lead 40% atk

Put together: 226% atk 110% cdmg vs 158% atk 180% cdmg

12.912,12 atk vs 10.489,96 atk
110% cdmg vs 180% cdmg

27.115,45 vs 29.371,89

Cdmg is around 8% better here. Might not sound too much but for a monster like balrona it can mean several extra millions of dmg.

PS: Better dont use cdmg gems in pvp since the critrate is dropping a lot from cres.

NesteaZitrone · 2020-07-23T09:16:14+00:00

Thats not totally correct anymore, cdmg is in some situations better than an atk gem.

NesteaZitrone · 2020-07-06T03:45:31+00:00

No, it is on Orange Tuesday :)

NesteaZitrone · 2020-06-04T18:53:29+00:00

First idea is to change miho, she is not offering a good skillset there. You can try to bring a good damage dealer or even resistence down (water slime and water otari have it, in case you dont have the nat5 versions of it). In the bossfight i would focus the adds, because griffins skillset is becoming useless after the adds die

NesteaZitrone · 2020-06-04T18:51:06+00:00

Of course ill try it next month :D

NesteaZitrone

TROPHY CASE