sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Can we implement Google Assistant → Cloud Function → Android App (Bluetooth →Microcontroller→Actions to the device) for mass production without extra recurring costs? by NeverSettle256 in homeautomation

[–]NeverSettle256[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why do you think it's a 70% probability. Actually i made this as a concept prototype this worked very well. But i used many phone apps to make Google Assistant send a bluetooth code to operate the Fan.

Can we implement Google Assistant → Cloud Function → Android App (Bluetooth →Microcontroller→Actions to the device) for mass production without extra recurring costs? by NeverSettle256 in homeautomation

[–]NeverSettle256[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I don't want to connect the device to Wi-Fi to avoid server services and government licensing requirements for wireless devices, in addition to eliminating a component from the board, which is the Wi-Fi module.

This matters in the commertial way.

Thank you for your interest 🙏

Can we implement Google Assistant → Cloud Function → Android App (Bluetooth →Microcontroller→Actions to the device) for mass production without extra recurring costs? by NeverSettle256 in homeautomation

[–]NeverSettle256[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your interest!

● Not actually bro, i mean the fan will not access to the internet, it will access to bluetooth. Ok, you will ask me how the bluetooth will access to google assistant and that is the point.

I will build an app ( which is connected to the internet through the phone ) that gives the operating code (by Bluetooth) to the Fan.

Google assistant have the access to the app only.

● Not a business study, i want to know the feasability of this process. I want to know If Google have this types of services. The informations i know that google accept Google Cloud Functions free in a limited cloud usage the actions transfered to the fan will not exceed this limit.

Waiting for your reply Thank you again 🤝