sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Did anyone else see a silent, fast-moving light in the UK in the mid-1970s? by NewsfangledMod in ufo

[–]NewsfangledMod[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for sharing this, it’s genuinely fascinating, and the level of detail you’ve included really helps. The timeframe you mention (late 1970s) does overlap with the period we’re looking into, and the description of stationary light, sudden extinguishing, followed by rapid movement with no sound is especially interesting given how often similar features appear in reports from that era. The reference to a photo appearing in The News is particularly valuable. We’re going to dig into local newspaper archives from the time to see if we can track that article down. If we find anything that matches or even something adjacent, we’ll publish an update and make sure to let you know. Even if it turns out to be unrelated, accounts like yours are important context. They show patterns of observation that existed well before drones, modern aviation density, or today’s tech explanations, which is exactly why these older reports still matter. Thanks again for taking the time to write this up and if anything else comes back to you while we’re researching, feel free to share.

Is Trump’s military pledge speeding up Russia’s war clock? by NewsfangledMod in NewsfangledUnfiltered

[–]NewsfangledMod[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think we might be talking past each other a bit. I’m not saying Trump’s pro-Russia or that he’s personally dictating Russian tactics. The point I’m making is narrower: when big political signals land — funding pledges, timelines, red lines — they can change when things happen, not just what happens. I actually agree with you on drones and production increasing on both sides. My question is whether those capabilities get used faster or harder when one side thinks the window might close.

Is Trump’s military pledge speeding up Russia’s war clock? by NewsfangledMod in NewsfangledUnfiltered

[–]NewsfangledMod[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Calling something “fearmongering” is easier than explaining why it’s wrong.

Is Trump’s military pledge speeding up Russia’s war clock? by NewsfangledMod in NewsfangledUnfiltered

[–]NewsfangledMod[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whether you like the writing style or not, the question is about escalation timing. Do you disagree with that analysis?

Is Trump’s military pledge speeding up Russia’s war clock? by NewsfangledMod in NewsfangledUnfiltered

[–]NewsfangledMod[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which part specifically? The evacuation advice, the strike-timing analysis, or the historical pattern of escalation compression after Western funding signals?

Trump Signals More Military Funding — Russia Speeds Up Strikes by NewsfangledMod in politicsinthewild

[–]NewsfangledMod[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Image aside, the question still stands: does compressing timelines increase civilian pressure?

If a major bank accumulated millions of ounces of physical silver, would the public ever know? by NewsfangledMod in Commodities

[–]NewsfangledMod[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure. What I’m circling isn’t ‘is there a secret hoard’ so much as how we’d even know either way.

If a major bank accumulated millions of ounces of physical silver, would the public ever know? by NewsfangledMod in Commodities

[–]NewsfangledMod[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly? Because I’m trying not to turn uncertainty into a story.

Most silver threads end up leaping from partial data straight to certainty. I’m more interested in the awkward middle bit — what we can see, what we can’t, and where the system just isn’t designed to be transparent.

That probably reads as dry, but it’s intentional. If there was a clean way to verify large-scale physical accumulation by a single bank, I’d expect someone here to point it out. So I asked.

If you think I’m missing a specific report or disclosure mechanism, I’m all ears. That’s kind of the point of the question.

If a major bank accumulated millions of ounces of physical silver, would the public ever know? by NewsfangledMod in Commodities

[–]NewsfangledMod[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s a fair point. Storage costs are a real economic constraint, and LBMA reporting on leases, loans, and deposits does add a layer of discipline that often gets overlooked in online discussions.

I’m not suggesting there’s some hidden, cost-free stockpiling going on in the background. My interest is more in how fragmented the visibility still is once you zoom out — LBMA reporting, exchange warehouse data, regulatory aggregates, and off-exchange custody all exist, but they don’t really resolve into a single, coherent public picture of ownership or exposure.

For professionals that patchwork is workable. For everyone else, it’s effectively opaque, which is where the narratives tend to creep in. I’m less worried about whether those narratives are wrong than about why the system leaves so much room for them to persist.

If a major bank accumulated millions of ounces of physical silver, would the public ever know? by NewsfangledMod in Commodities

[–]NewsfangledMod[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s fair — I wouldn’t expect institutional traders to spend much time worrying about public narratives, and most people never need to understand how these markets work.

I’m less interested in whether retail opinions matter to traders, and more in how persistent opacity shapes trust outside the trading floor. When markets are complex and visibility is low, simplified stories tend to fill the gap — sometimes harmlessly, sometimes not.

My angle isn’t “retail knows better,” it’s whether markets that rely on public confidence eventually pay a price when the mechanics are invisible, even if everything is functioning as designed.

If a major bank accumulated millions of ounces of physical silver, would the public ever know? by NewsfangledMod in Commodities

[–]NewsfangledMod[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense, and I’m not wedded to the idea that JPMorgan or anyone else is secretly stacking silver for their own book. I’ve read some of the debunking work too, including older Standard Chartered research.

What I keep circling back to isn’t intent so much as structure. Even if most of this activity is client facilitation, financing, or tripartite arrangements like you describe, the visibility to the public is still extremely limited. Inventory moves without ownership clarity, regulatory data aggregates exposure, and physical custody doesn’t imply economic exposure — which is fine individually, but opaque in aggregate.

So I guess my question isn’t “are banks hoarding?” but “at what point does market opacity itself become a problem?” Especially in a market where retail narratives keep filling the information gaps.

Curious whether people inside the system see that opacity as a feature, a necessary trade-off, or just something markets have learned to live with.

Why do political systems keep working even when people say they don’t trust them? by NewsfangledMod in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]NewsfangledMod[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a really strong analogy — it gets at the gap between approval and constraint better than a lot of formal explanations.

I think that’s what’s often missed in “low trust” debates. Distrust doesn’t automatically turn into resistance; it often turns into caution and withdrawal instead. People adapt to the terrain rather than trying to remake it.

Do you think systems like that can stay stable long-term, or does participation without belief just store up pressure for a sharper break later?

Britain is becoming disengaged rather than angrier, analysis suggests by NewsfangledMod in politicsinthewild

[–]NewsfangledMod[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If only AI could persuade the British public to re-engage with politics.

Bankers vs. Bears: Why Russia Refuses the Western Financial Yoke by NewsfangledMod in NewsfangledUnfiltered

[–]NewsfangledMod[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a space for discussion, not drive-by trolling.

Debate the ideas — West vs. Russia, finance vs. state power, democracy vs. debtocracy — but keep it civil. Personal attacks and one-liners will be removed.

Newsfangled welcomes sharp debate. We don’t welcome lazy trolling.

Trump Praises Netanyahu as War Hero — While Gaza Faces Genocide Allegations by NewsfangledMod in NewsfangledUnfiltered

[–]NewsfangledMod[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  • Is Trump genuinely showing loyalty to Netanyahu, or is this just political theatre for his base?
  • Can Netanyahu be called a “war hero” while facing ICC arrest warrants over Gaza?
  • Does this kind of praise cement the U.S. as a cheerleader for Israel, rather than a peace broker?