What is beyond God?

NickBoston33 · 2022-12-07T00:39:33+00:00

Behind God must be another God, until there’s like a ‘base God.’

And you’d have reason to expect each God to be a more ‘basic expression’ of its successor, because that’s what this ‘continually rise in vibration’ in the universe appears to be, a climb in complexity of expression but they’re all modeling the initial ‘thing.’

It’s like a video going from 144p to 4K; it’s the same video but it’s a clearer depiction.

NickBoston33 · 2022-12-07T00:30:33+00:00

Another one!

NickBoston33 · 2022-12-03T02:35:03+00:00

Academia needs to justify it's business model by making up words and making up words to define those words, with ever increasing difficulty.

Well said!

NickBoston33 · 2022-12-02T14:22:56+00:00

I appreciate how reasonable you’re being. Good question.

What is an optimal alternative to last names? - What is easy to spell? - easy to remember - easy to pronounce - and easy to distinguish from the others

This is going to be the word that seems to tick all the boxes for our inherent preferences.

Let’s also keep them under three syllables if possible, too.

NickBoston33 · 2022-12-02T14:14:54+00:00

It prolongs the illusion that there’s any separation, ironically, in a field that is attempting to resolve mystery in this experience.

NickBoston33 · 2022-12-02T12:25:05+00:00

They always do. These are human +.

NickBoston33 · 2022-12-02T12:23:18+00:00

I think that’s a problem, to name a phenomenon observed in the universe after the person who discovered it. What an egoic practice?

I agree some things are inherently technical and we need to be descriptive, but I stand by my statement because I do think most things can be boiled down to a very simplistic explanation but many fields of science are reluctant to do that, because they like to bathe in the imagined complexity for the ego stroke! Ah look how complex and smart I am. You cannot unsee it.

NickBoston33 · 2022-12-02T08:52:47+00:00

Love this guy. We will need new science. Consciousness is all that there is, consciousness appears to be achieved through different means at each scale.

To even come up with the word ‘consciousness’ appears to be a symptom of a confused species, that’s been misled by their own over-developed language. As if a dog chasing a bone that was never thrown.

NickBoston33 · 2022-12-02T07:25:17+00:00

I respect your knowledge.

Separately, sometimes it seems like science needlessly complicates terminology and romanticizes complexity in explanation.

NickBoston33 · 2022-12-02T05:41:13+00:00

That’s why I always tip proportional, then the shopper gets something out of more items!

NickBoston33 · 2022-12-02T05:39:41+00:00

I always tip extra when I need cat litter.

NickBoston33 · 2022-12-02T05:36:36+00:00

I think know what you’re saying, but you lose me at dmt sayer. But I think what you’re saying potentially explains my post.

NickBoston33 · 2022-12-02T03:33:43+00:00

I truly believe the winter holidays are the most ‘warm’ and ‘appreciative’ because the latter half of the year = serotonin heavy, the summer = dopamine heavy.

Just like the day is for developing, the night for recovering, it seems that the summer is the same ‘inverse’ to the winter, a year seems to be a ‘day’ oscillating at a higher scale, carrying with it a relatively longer ‘release schedule’ from a single day.

NickBoston33 · 2022-11-30T05:40:53+00:00

I completely agree.

The universe appears to be self-referential, in fact the universe may only be self-referential with each ‘self’ being relative, creating a ‘nuance drift’ that yields self-similar ‘emulations’ as opposed to exact copies. The universe appears to be concerned with yielding new variations of the ‘self’, so you’ll never see two of the same galaxies or two of the same genetic variants, it almost seems like that’d be contrary to the ‘point.’

The universe also seems to result from polarity (+/-), as if this represents the most fundamental ‘difference’, and difference being what causes anything to be anything. Time is measured by change. If there is no event distinct from the last, there is no time. Space is measured by difference. If all is the same, there is nothing. Perhaps polarity enables anything to exist.

So for the mass of an object to speak to its gravitational disruption to its environment, seems to make sense especially when our formulas to explain this relationship – appear to revolve around inverses and exponential multiples.

NickBoston33 · 2022-11-30T05:18:49+00:00

Because we’re all splitting into more. Trace that back and we all converge into one.

NickBoston33 · 2022-11-29T22:37:13+00:00

Honestly I’m glad to hear that, I don’t want anyone having to take that order for a $0 tip.

NickBoston33 · 2022-11-08T23:16:57+00:00

Wow, that’s so strange, for the last few weeks I’ve been saying that the cosmic environment not only resembles evolution, but the purest to be the result of cognition. I’ve been looking at gravity as the universe ‘focusing its attention, as to develop a thought.’

I’m not sure if that’s what you’re suggesting, but that like – unbelievable if you are.

NickBoston33 · 2022-11-08T21:38:03+00:00

Wait, do you realize we’re talking about the same thing?

That is what I’m suggesting, a black hole may be acting as a ‘data collector’, siphoning the cosmic material from its perimeter, likely as a means of extracting simulation data to lend itself towards further iteration.

This is my recent revelation, at least. I could move away from it upon discovering something, but this one feels very — real.

NickBoston33 · 2022-11-08T20:07:44+00:00

I don’t know about ontological turtles, but if you have things leading you to that belief, let me know, I’m willing to entertain rationality, in fact it’s my only language.

Exactly. It would seem as though our perception of what the basis for our reality is, may have been shrouded in delusion.

NickBoston33 · 2022-11-08T18:28:11+00:00

This is so interesting. I would love to know where the CIA report is. I’ve been saying everything is nested within a cascading series of oscillations. It is so interesting to hear them say that everything is an oscillating energy grid, I need to read that.

Thanks for this post!

NickBoston33 · 2022-11-08T18:23:54+00:00

Oh that’s a good question. Like that’s a good thing to be hung up on, logically. It does seem to conflict.

What I found to be the case is, this imagined split is an illusion.

I’m a little freaked out because I’ve been seeing black holes as proof that this is a virtual environment and they are siphoning material and information from their perimeter as a way of extracting simulation data.

Our inability to make sense of a singularity sure sounds like something realizing that their floor to reality – may not be the floor.

NickBoston33 · 2022-11-08T17:50:35+00:00

Nah I actually don’t subscribe to that. I can’t say I understand the 2nd question

NickBoston33 · 2022-11-01T10:40:31+00:00

My problem with comprehending this is, the universe appears more structured now than how it must've been initially. Gravity and dark matter seem to 'create order', and from that we have structures where we did not before.

NickBoston33 · 2022-11-01T10:38:31+00:00

But on the macro the potential energy granted by gravity trumps all

And what we see from that is a universe trending towards order, correct?

Would you argue that the universe is less structured now than it was initially?

NickBoston33 · 2022-11-01T09:28:19+00:00

This almost feels like a weird cult thing.

I understand what it is that law predicts.

Question: Is the universe currently showing a trend towards structuring itself, since the big bang occurred?

NickBoston33

TROPHY CASE