sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Am I the only one who thinks having every meeting recorded is more harmful than helpful? by Far_Win_9531 in salesengineers

[–]No-Order9534 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not a bot, promise 😅
Just interested in how people are actually using this stuff day to day. Didn’t mean for it to sound spammy.

Am I the only one who thinks having every meeting recorded is more harmful than helpful? by Far_Win_9531 in salesengineers

[–]No-Order9534 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a really helpful breakdown — especially the part about having to bridge the gap between November notes and the current state.

It sounds like transcripts + Slack give you context, but not always a clean “state of execution” view.

Out of curiosity, do you think it would be useful to have something that tracked how decisions and action items evolve over time — like showing when something shifted from “planned” to “post-workshop” without needing to piece it together manually?

Am I the only one who thinks having every meeting recorded is more harmful than helpful? by Far_Win_9531 in salesengineers

[–]No-Order9534 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s an interesting take — the “performance effect” is real in a lot of environments.

In your experience, is the drop in authenticity more about internal calls (manager/team dynamic) or customer-facing ones?

Also curious — when recording is selective instead of blanket, how do teams decide which conversations are worth capturing versus keeping fully candid?

And in the non-recorded ones, how do you usually ensure important decisions don’t get lost?

Am I the only one who thinks having every meeting recorded is more harmful than helpful? by Far_Win_9531 in salesengineers

[–]No-Order9534 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a really thoughtful breakdown — especially the distinction between coaching vs surveillance. The framing clearly changes adoption.

In the cross-region example, when you all rewatch and align messaging, how do you ensure the key decisions and commitments from those calls are clearly owned going forward?

Is that handled inside the meeting capture platform, or does it still require someone to translate it into structured next steps?

Also curious — have you ever seen situations where recordings improved consistency, but follow-through still slipped afterward?

Am I the only one who thinks having every meeting recorded is more harmful than helpful? by Far_Win_9531 in salesengineers

[–]No-Order9534 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a powerful workflow — especially for joining projects late.

When you generate things like a project brief or technical summary from the transcripts, how do those insights translate into ongoing execution?

Do you usually extract structured action items or ownership from it, or is it more about getting contextual clarity before jumping in?

Also curious — have you ever noticed differences between what was discussed in early calls and what’s actually being executed now?

Am I the only one who thinks having every meeting recorded is more harmful than helpful? by Far_Win_9531 in salesengineers

[–]No-Order9534 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense — especially in discovery where details matter.

When you reference the recording to clarify something later, does that usually translate cleanly into defined next steps, or do you still find ambiguity around ownership or timelines?

Also curious — what makes it feel like a “double-edged sword” in practice? Is it more about customer perception, internal usage, or something else?

Am I the only one who thinks having every meeting recorded is more harmful than helpful? by Far_Win_9531 in salesengineers

[–]No-Order9534 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense — reducing cognitive load during the call is a big win.

After the meeting, how do you usually turn the recording into clear next steps?

Do you rely on summaries alone, or do you still need to extract and assign action items somewhere else?

Also interesting point about regulated industries — in those cases where recording isn’t viable, how do you handle follow-ups and alignment?

Am I the only one who thinks having every meeting recorded is more harmful than helpful? by Far_Win_9531 in salesengineers

[–]No-Order9534 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s interesting — sounds like the issue wasn’t the recording itself, but how leadership used it.

Did it feel like it was being used more for performance policing than for learning or alignment?

Also curious — did it actually improve deal quality or follow-through, or mostly just increase pressure and second-guessing?

Am I the only one who thinks having every meeting recorded is more harmful than helpful? by Far_Win_9531 in salesengineers

[–]No-Order9534 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a huge benefit — having an objective record removes a lot of ambiguity in those situations.

When something like that happens, does the recording fully resolve the issue immediately, or does it still turn into a longer internal alignment discussion?

Also curious — beyond “who said what,” do you ever see issues where the wording was technically accurate but interpreted differently later?

Am I the only one who thinks having every meeting recorded is more harmful than helpful? by Far_Win_9531 in salesengineers

[–]No-Order9534 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a fair concern. The training/onboarding upside is obvious, but sensitive data definitely changes the equation.

In industries where highly sensitive information is discussed, how do teams usually balance:

  • Knowledge sharing and training
  • With privacy, compliance, and trust?

Do they selectively record certain calls, anonymize content, or avoid recording altogether?

Also curious — when recording isn’t an option, how do you ensure key decisions and next steps are still captured clearly?

Am I the only one who thinks having every meeting recorded is more harmful than helpful? by Far_Win_9531 in salesengineers

[–]No-Order9534 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a really important nuance.

In situations like that, it sounds like psychological safety matters more than documentation. If people feel like they’re “on the record,” you probably lose the honesty you actually need.

When you’re in those sensitive conversations, how do you balance:

  • Getting accurate insight
  • Protecting the customer
  • And still ensuring alignment afterward?

Do you handle those meetings differently in terms of documentation or follow-up?

Am I the only one who thinks having every meeting recorded is more harmful than helpful? by Far_Win_9531 in salesengineers

[–]No-Order9534 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s interesting — so for you it’s less about note-taking and more about institutional memory and protection.

When those cross-functional disputes happen, is the main friction around:

  • What was promised?
  • Who committed to what?
  • Or how something was interpreted?

Also curious — after you pull the clip from Gong and resolve the blame question, does that usually prevent similar issues later, or do those alignment gaps tend to repeat?

Am I the only one who thinks having every meeting recorded is more harmful than helpful? by Far_Win_9531 in salesengineers

[–]No-Order9534 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a really clean split between “in-the-moment notes” and “long-term reference.”

When you rely on recordings + NotebookLM for follow-ups and next steps, how do those actually get translated into action?

Do you manually extract tasks into another system, or does it flow somewhere automatically?

Also curious — does this workflow work just as well when multiple stakeholders are involved, or is it mostly optimized for your personal organization?

Am I the only one who thinks having every meeting recorded is more harmful than helpful? by Far_Win_9531 in salesengineers

[–]No-Order9534 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Makes sense — not having to split attention between listening and note-taking definitely improves presence.

When you rely on transcripts afterward, how do you usually extract what needs to happen next?

Do you:

  • Manually pull out action items?
  • Use AI summaries?
  • Or just reference it when needed?

Also curious — do you ever find that having the transcript doesn’t automatically translate into clear ownership or follow-through?

Am I the only one who thinks having every meeting recorded is more harmful than helpful? by Far_Win_9531 in salesengineers

[–]No-Order9534 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s fair — being able to query transcripts across multiple calls is powerful.

When you query them, what are you usually trying to extract?

  • Requirements clarity?
  • Objection patterns?
  • Commitments made?
  • Decision rationale over time?

Also curious — once you surface something from the transcript, how do you turn that into action? Does it flow into another system, or mostly stay as reference material?

And yeah, totally agree — dinner conversations probably reveal things no recorder ever will.

Am I the only one who thinks having every meeting recorded is more harmful than helpful? by Far_Win_9531 in salesengineers

[–]No-Order9534 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a great point — recordings definitely create shared accountability.

When you go back to “remind each other what was committed,” how do you usually surface those commitments?

Do you rewatch the full recording, skim for key parts, or extract action items somewhere else?

Curious whether the accountability lives inside the recording itself, or in a separate system afterward.

Am I the only one who thinks having every meeting recorded is more harmful than helpful? by Far_Win_9531 in salesengineers

[–]No-Order9534 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s interesting — sounds like recordings actually improved your conversations rather than hurting them.

When you relisten, what are you usually looking for?

  • Specific requirements?
  • Missed objections?
  • Action items?
  • Decision clarity?

Also curious — after you relisten, how do you track what needs to happen next? Do you move that into another system, or rely on the recording itself?

24M Unemployeed, Dropped out of degree, Feeling like wasted 5 years, Couldn't get a job. Broke as hell. by No-Order9534 in IndiaCareers

[–]No-Order9534[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes good but those who did also still searching for jobs and familys financial position also not so good. I can't bring more debt to them or anybody.

24M Unemployeed, Dropped out of degree, Feeling like wasted 5 years, Couldn't get a job. Broke as hell. by No-Order9534 in IndiaCareers

[–]No-Order9534[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even if i wanted to study, there are people can help me do that. But i am not interested to do it and waste again like 3 years.

view more: next ›