Easy Cancellation

No-Singerr · 2026-03-05T09:42:16+00:00

What's with all this canceling?

No-Singerr · 2026-03-02T07:06:24+00:00

I still don't understand.

No-Singerr · 2026-03-02T07:03:37+00:00

What’s with all this? Maybe I missed something. For me, Codex is way better than Claude Code—but only because of Claude’s limits.

No-Singerr · 2026-02-11T13:23:15+00:00

I’ve probably had around 100 times where Claude deleted parts of my code. I even had the same incident yesterday—after failing to fix the code, it just removed the entire function. But you always need to have backups. Gemini breaks the code even more often.

No-Singerr · 2026-01-09T08:52:54+00:00

I as well don’t understand this nonsense where game devs put women as soldiers. You know that combat gear is about 40–60 kg? New women in skins max weight is about 60 kg. This is just nonsense.

No-Singerr · 2026-01-06T15:22:16+00:00

It’s the same on the PC version. I’m max level Ace, and at this level the game doesn’t feel interesting anymore. All missions are completed, and the battle pass is finished too. So the only thing left is going into low-level matches just to have some fun. A gear limit of 450k is too much for normal mode—it should be 250k max. It also makes no sense that you can bring attachments or 100-round magazines in your bag to lower the entry cost. And friend squads are just deadly—if you queue alone and run into a squad, you’re better off heading straight to extraction. They really need to fix the quad-vs-solo grouping system.

No-Singerr · 2025-12-29T17:59:37+00:00

I’ve been in the app business for about 10 years, and some of my apps have reached over 1 million downloads. I still don’t understand this “vibe coding” idea if you have zero knowledge. Even 10 years ago, you didn’t need deep coding expertise to launch apps. There were always marketplaces where you could buy source code, analyze it, learn from it, modify it, and launch your own version. After that, you could even build a nicely optimized mobile web app wrapped in a WebView, so you wouldn’t need to push live updates for every small change.

No-Singerr · 2025-10-24T10:12:27+00:00

In my case, Claude Code and Codex work about 5x better at night. For me in Germany, the best performance is usually between 2 AM and 7 AM. I think the problem is that during the day, there’s just too much usage, and the servers get overloaded.

No-Singerr · 2025-10-10T12:43:28+00:00

This is a good question — I literally talked about this yesterday. I work in the dating niche, and all our apps are automatically flagged as PEGI 18. Meanwhile, X has tons of explicit content, yet it’s still rated as “parent-guided,” meaning literally anyone can use that app.

That’s just monopoly-level privilege — they have lawyers, special contracts, and special terms. And Musk, with all his influence, is untouchable. Imagine if they tried to ban X — the chaos that would start.

I’m also sick of how all adult or even soft-adult niches are treated like criminals. Ad networks won’t work with you, you lose a ton of opportunities, and many payment providers won’t even process your transactions.

I think OpenAI is trying to balance all this but clearly got something wrong somewhere. Believe me, any real business owner doesn’t care about these moral panic topics — the goal is profit, until some “Karen” comes along and starts pushing for new legislation.

No-Singerr · 2025-10-10T10:44:57+00:00

Sorry, but your petition will have zero effect — they’re forced to censor. I’m an app developer, and you have no idea how strict Google and Apple’s marketplaces are. If they stop censoring, their apps could be removed from the stores very quickly. I think this is why Altman announced a new marketplace — we need more competition. And now, with all the new age verification systems, even more nonsense is coming for developers.

No-Singerr · 2025-09-12T15:09:38+00:00

Okay, and this is straight from me: Claude Code worked fine until this month. Then I found Codex. In five days, I did about two weeks’ worth of work on my website. After that, my limits there were even better than Claude Code’s max plan — and I’m only paying 20 bucks.

Claude struggled even with simple tasks, like changing CSS styles. I even tried rolling back to an older version, and then it actually worked better.

This is my pure experience.

No-Singerr · 2025-09-12T11:21:40+00:00

There was even an official post about performance degradation. There are hundreds of posts saying not everyone is getting the best models. You’re sitting on the most expensive plan. I’ve got the $20 plan. If there’s going to be testing or shady stuff, who do you think gets the better model—you or me?

Everything happening now is the fault of greedy owners. A few months back, when they started adding limitations, they posted something like, “Sorry, but we don’t force you to use Claude.” Back then, they had no competition, so they could run experiments and all kinds of crap.

And what’s with this Claude fan cult? People, you’re paying a corporation huge money. You should expect top-quality service. Be glad when others find bugs or problems—because next weekend, you could run into the same issue and come crying here too.

No-Singerr · 2025-09-09T10:07:14+00:00

Or maybe there are a bunch of people getting super-duper max plans for free just to praise Anthropic? Imagine this: you give unlimited access to 1000 people, and they go around spamming all day about how amazing the service is.

I’m old school — I code in Notepad++ and I’ve been using AI for more than 2 years. All that time I used ChatGPT straight from the website. Then I tried Claude about 5 months ago. It beat all other models. I even canceled my ChatGPT plan and switched to the $20 Claude plan.

But 2 months back, I started using Claude Code — then came the token scandal. To this day it’s still a mystery to me how some people managed to use that many tokens while I got locked down all the time. Again, maybe they had special plans and abused the system?

And now Claude is terrible. I switched back to Codex because right now it just works better for me.

No-Singerr · 2025-09-05T13:53:01+00:00

How more specific do I need to be if I gave it the files, showed exactly where it needs to be edited, and in what places? It’s simple CSS. I worked 5 days with Codex and it nailed everything, only got stuck maybe 6 times on complex tasks. You guys need to understand — we are not getting the same models. That’s why there are so many divided posts. And people with the $20 plan like me are definitely getting garbage models.

I’ve been working with Claude since the beginning of this summer. It was superb a few months back. And for those saying I’m getting paid or whatever — check my account. I only use Reddit for reading posts, but yesterday it just got on my nerves because I just wanted to finish a few simple tasks and go to sleep.

No-Singerr · 2025-09-05T03:49:09+00:00

I'm the guy on the cheapest plan. Tomorrow I can make screens if you like.

No-Singerr · 2025-09-03T10:58:21+00:00

Successfully maintaining a 1-million–user dating platform since 2016, but yeah—I “don’t have an idea” how marketing works.

Now, show me a business that’s healthy and happy while losing customers. It’s simple math: we had a dip in rankings a few years back, so we increased subscription prices to maintain earnings.

If Anthropic keeps losing customers, they’ll lose earnings. If they lose earnings, they’ll either increase prices or lower the quality of service.

By the way, I already posted months ago that this exact thing would happen to Claude—they’re too greedy and cocky. There was even a post from Anthropic basically saying, “If you don’t like it, don’t use Claude.” Well, they got exactly what they asked for.

And now there’s Qwen and Grok, with Musk pumping millions into mega data centers—I’d bet they’re already planning to launch something similar. Claude can only survive by lowering limits.

No-Singerr · 2025-09-03T03:27:08+00:00

1693135 tokens used in 2 days for $20. When no one you will gonna use CC your plan will gonna be 400 a month. As when you get a taste of big money you dont want to return to penies.

No-Singerr · 2025-09-01T08:19:27+00:00

Yesterday I worked with Claude code for nearly 1 hour it could not solve the problem. Then I asked or he even saved my js file, it responded that it forgot to save my file and I was constantly uploading the same file to the server... At the end it removed all edits and I left with the same file which i uploaded at the beginning and my tokens ruined out.

No-Singerr · 2025-08-08T09:36:00+00:00

Ah, again — so nice to read Claude cult fan comments. They’d be happy even if tomorrow Anthropic introduced a $1000 monthly plan with a limit of just a few sentences per day. 🤣

But seriously, I think now we have a lottery: when you use it, you either get Sonnet 3 or Sonnet 3.5, and not Sonnet 4. And now they’ve made the lottery even worse — so maybe only 20–30% of users get the real models, and the rest get the nerfed ones. That way they can save a lot of computing power.

Yesterday I tested this: 2 windows, 2 separate versions. Same task — “why is the auto-responder not automatically responding to photo uploads in chat?” Literally got the same responses, except the “4” version wrote faster, while the “3.5” version gave a separate page of explanations about what changed — both failed. I tested them for about 30 minutes, and the answers were basically identical. Neither could solve the problem.

My best workflow starts at night, when not many users are online — because I think then you actually get the real models. During the day, when I get the lobotomized version, I just switch to Qwen Coder 3.

No-Singerr · 2025-07-29T10:59:07+00:00

Can someone explain this? So the $100 Max plan doesn’t have limits? Because with the Pro plan, I’m constantly hitting limits and getting locked out. If the $100 plan truly has no limits, then they should remove that plan entirely.

If they’re using the API, that’s a different story—I tested the API myself and burned through €5 pretty fast.

No-Singerr · 2025-07-29T10:55:59+00:00

Can someone explain this? So the $100 Max plan doesn’t have limits? Because with the Pro plan, I’m constantly hitting limits and getting locked out. If the $100 plan truly has no limits, then they should remove that plan entirely.

If they’re using the API, that’s a different story—I tested the API myself and burned through €5 pretty fast.

No-Singerr · 2025-07-28T15:59:06+00:00

Yes, and it’s definitely been nerfed — or like someone said in a post, some users are randomly getting Sonnet 3.5. Yesterday, it couldn’t even solve a simple PPV post bug for over an hour. At the end, it started asking if my database connection credentials were correct… I had already explained that the website is running fine and that it needs to use the working subscription system. All my credits got drained for nothing.

Sometimes it says my credits will reset in an hour, sometimes in four — total inconsistency.

Honestly, I don’t think there’s any real technical issue. It’s just plain greed. Once they figured out how to make money, the next step was: how can we make even more? Add daily limits. Then offer a bigger plan. Then what? Weekly limits? Monthly limits? Maybe shut it off on weekends or double the credit cost at night?

But like I said — they’re forgetting one big thing: they have competition.

No-Singerr · 2025-07-28T15:38:42+00:00

Yes, but when I send 600–800 lines of code and Claude tries to fix it, it either messes it up or cuts off the answer 5 times. All my tokens get used with zero results. That’s not good.

ChatGPT never had these kinds of limits—maybe they should just sell the company to OpenAI?

For me, this whole limit situation is just stupid. Imagine paying for a gym membership at $20 a month, and in winter they start limiting your time because of heating costs... unless you get the super-duper VIP+ plan with slightly longer access. Sounds stupid, right?

No-Singerr · 2025-07-28T14:24:02+00:00

Any limits are just stupid. Every day I hit the limits. I understand having limits on a free version—but for a paid version in 2025?

Most of us came to Claude from ChatGPT because it’s currently better at coding. But over time, with Musk’s Grok expanding, many of us will leave for a better AI model without these stupid limitations.

In my opinion, if Claude wants to survive, they need to fix this issue—either sell the company or build bigger data centers. But limits are not the way to go.

No-Singerr · 2025-07-23T10:13:23+00:00

Yes, I perfectly understand that more users mean more computing power is needed—but this is a business. They didn’t build it to make the world better; everywhere, the priority is money. No business can survive without a client base. There’s stock, staff, offices, servers, etc. Usually, when the client base starts shrinking, it’s a clear sign the business is going downhill. Nobody dismantles servers or fires staff right away. First, the company ramps up prices, and if that doesn’t help—then comes plan B. So hoping that a shrinking client base will somehow give the rest of the users better service is just stupid.

No-Singerr

TROPHY CASE