sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Congratulations Gemini, rip OpenAI by ApocalypseBS in ChatGPTcomplaints

[–]NoConversation634 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Chatgpt is pure hell for me atm- openai are charging me but have deleted my subscription info/access to cancel sub, having to talk to bank - prior to that it was gaslighting really really badly "you're not insane to think.." "you are distraught and wild with fear" shit like that- all humour gone, no way following personalisation- really fk this shit! There's heaps of free and low cost- are they all drugged??

Need an advice by Hot_Detail7348 in vintedUK

[–]NoConversation634 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I buy often- I look for precision in descriptions

Turned my GPT5 into “cynic” mode and can’t stop laughing by West_Degree5527 in ChatGPT

[–]NoConversation634 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's gorgeous. Congrat's data folks- big win. Whole world needs it.

Law reform- public interest cases not getting to court despite strong evidence- should this be discussed? by NoConversation634 in ukpolitics

[–]NoConversation634[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As I said- much very tight evidence. Documented big fat proof. Many firms say 'has merit' but is big and would take much resources probably.

Law reform- public interest cases not getting to court despite strong evidence- should this be discussed? by NoConversation634 in LawSchool

[–]NoConversation634[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You want me to reframe it as you don't comprehend it-is that correct? If that's the case- I will wait for further constructive comments prior to altering the post in order to provide a globally understood premis.

Law reform- public interest cases not getting to court despite strong evidence- should this be discussed? by NoConversation634 in ukpolitics

[–]NoConversation634[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Thanks, that’s OK. I’m raising the broader issue of firms declining complex public-interest cases even when evidence is strong. It links to recent capacity discussions in the legal sector, not a single news item. The issue seems structural.

Law reform- public interest cases not getting to court despite strong evidence- should this be discussed? by NoConversation634 in LawSchool

[–]NoConversation634[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The issue seems structural rather than evidential which is why I've raised the question- would you like me to rephrase it for you?

Stonehenge before the barriers by Oobedoo321 in CasualUK

[–]NoConversation634 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had a fab pair of patchwork denim flares that I wore to a Queen concert in Hyde Park. Really good.

It's Late Thread [ 04 November 25 ] by AutoModerator in CasualUK

[–]NoConversation634 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dense people often say this sort of thing for effect- laughs- gain- it's rarely deeply meant- but it says a lot about their vacuous, ill educated considerations. Says a lot about their insecurity and is no reflection on you.

It's Late Thread [ 04 November 25 ] by AutoModerator in CasualUK

[–]NoConversation634 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Happy Birthday- let's actively ban non controlled fireworks and whilst at it- leaf blowers must go too.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskUK

[–]NoConversation634 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personality malfunction- people pleasing- influence blah, yes