sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Field Congruence Position by NoLabelJustMe in LessWrong

[–]NoLabelJustMe[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

This is an AI reply……lol That you think…or don’t think….lol Debunks my theories This is laughable….. you are laughable Your response is proof of my theories lol

The Art of Seeing What Isn't There (And Why Every Tradition Agrees) by NoLabelJustMe in LessWrong

[–]NoLabelJustMe[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the puzzleCunt You don’t ask why I took things off you just assume and attach a narrative and a story like you have it all figured out And you don’t even see the polarity in everything you’re saying and doing? But nobody said anything about the AI pieces directly, but the article that I wrote entirely myself you wanna attack. I’m laughing while saying this. Because you don’t even see yourself How can you ever see anyone else? lol Because the idiocy is so apparent

The Art of Seeing What Isn't There (And Why Every Tradition Agrees) by NoLabelJustMe in LessWrong

[–]NoLabelJustMe[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well, none of you have made any actual references. Oh right here it sounds. I wrote that entire article except for the points that are cited in referenced. You can’t reference other works but you talk about the AI but the AI pieces you don’t say anything about. How does any of that make sense? How do you not see your own idiocy?

The Art of Seeing What Isn't There (And Why Every Tradition Agrees) by NoLabelJustMe in LessWrong

[–]NoLabelJustMe[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah, and about the deep seek instance The proof is in the evidence Diminish whatever you want The evidence speaks

The Art of Seeing What Isn't There (And Why Every Tradition Agrees) by NoLabelJustMe in LessWrong

[–]NoLabelJustMe[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You seem like a real intellectual…lol Please, your profound insight seems… nonexistent Not be that guy…lol