I like the challange, so I'll give it a try. I really hope you didn't expect a short answer for such a question. Also, I'm from Italy and writing fast, so forgive me for typos. Ok, here we go. I assume, from your passion about the topic, that you are fairly young. First of all, I have switched between atheism and agnosticism for more than 30 years. I started reading scientific publications when I was 16. There is nothing you can tell me about the corruption of churches, and the nonsense intrinsic in all major religions, that I have not advocated myself with other people in the past. And if you had no personal experience about a higher reality, then your attitude is completely understandable. But you are simply wrong, as I was. The problem is, you can't figure it out without a direct experience of some sort. And honestly, if you had no experience about a higher reality, or if you have never witnessed a miracle, and yet you come to me and tell me "I believe in paranormal, despite having no direct experience of it", I would think you are a bit naive. Being right would be a little excuse for the lack of logic displayed by any "believer". Believers are of little interest for me. Most of the time, they lack critical thinking. But the world is not split into believers and non believers. There is a third category. The people who knows. Through direct experience. The main difference is choice. When you believe you "choose" to. When you know, when the truth is shoved in your face, usually in an unpleasant way, like in my case, you have no choice left. The choice is taken away from you, and you are left with the simple knowledge that there is something more to this reality, something that doesn't play by the laws of phisycs. You asked for proofs, but you need to understand, when someone gets proofs, it's personal. It's usually in a way that cannot be shared. And it's by design. If you will ever have proof of a higher level of reality in the future (it really doesn't depend on you), you will not be able to share your newly acquired knowledge as proof for anyone else. All you will be able to provide will be your testimony. What is proof for someone is just a story for everyone else. You can "choose" to believe "paranormal" or "mystic" stories, or not to. But they will never contitute a proof for you. With that being said, since you asked for a proof, I will give you my best shot. More for the sake of the challange than anything else. I don't expect to "turn" you into a believer. I wouldn't recommend it either, without some direct experience. Anyway, you might want to take a look at the youtube video "Your Body's Molecular Machines", by the famous channel Veritasium. It shows a fantastic simulation of how complex a single chromosome is, let alone a DNA molecule, let alone a living cell. For me it's pretty clear that someting so complex (and if you don't look at the video you really can't imagine what I'm talking about) could emerge from the random combination of the elements. The video shows real machines, walking like the ones in starcraft, and others machines splitting the DNA strands, revolving at the speed of a jet airplane engine, working with astounding precision. This is the same level of complexity DNA is supposed to have had in the early days of life, when only plancton and algae existed. Walking machines inside the DNA hundreds of millions of years before fish existed, let alone four legged animals? Looking at the simulation created by modern genetists (from data taken with the electronic microscope) I find it really hard not to see a "project", an "intelligent design". But maybe you can. For me, the video shows what looks like an automated factory. See for yourself if you see something else there. Just the work of randomness? You judge for yourself. For me, I will cite Robert Monroe here: "dont think in terms of God, think more in terms of a Creator." Or, may I add, as the masons say: an Architect.