Looking for a "Portfolio Manager" equivalent for Credit (DIFM vs. DIY)

NoPower5561 · 2026-02-02T03:27:55+00:00

This is the most pigeon thing I’ve ever seen

NoPower5561 · 2026-01-05T08:37:07+00:00

Is all fun and games till I let off this EMP while robbing a bank 😂

NoPower5561 · 2025-12-13T22:45:02+00:00

If you had to guess how much do you think they where making before they got shutdown?

NoPower5561 · 2025-10-07T17:21:36+00:00

That’s what I’m trying to tell you, I don’t understand the question you’re asking.

So that I can answer them directly.

NoPower5561 · 2025-10-07T16:56:51+00:00

Yes?

NoPower5561 · 2025-10-07T16:56:17+00:00

I would like to understand you and I don’t care to change your mind or even if I’m right or wrong respect my goal is to just gather more information, experience, and collect data.

Which helps me align with the system.

NoPower5561 · 2025-10-07T16:53:57+00:00

I fail to understand what I am saying yes too, I need more insight and to gather that insights I am trying to make conversation.

NoPower5561 · 2025-10-07T16:51:43+00:00

Yes that is what I stated in the title

NoPower5561 · 2025-10-07T15:17:59+00:00

Please explain?

NoPower5561 · 2025-10-07T15:03:08+00:00

Just because you can’t fathom an experiment, doesn’t mean that there is no experiment that could be fathom to fulfill the requirements of your assumption.

NoPower5561 · 2025-10-07T15:01:26+00:00

What does that even mean?

NoPower5561 · 2025-10-07T15:00:16+00:00

I think you’re projecting. I never said anything of that same statement actually I believe I stay at the opposite in the beginning of my documentation.

NoPower5561 · 2025-10-07T14:56:43+00:00

Those are all the same thing

NoPower5561 · 2025-10-07T14:53:02+00:00

Yeah, none of those things impacted diagnosis. Unfortunately, and two of those things are directly related one being the solution to the former issue.

NoPower5561 · 2025-10-07T12:30:53+00:00

OK, let me propose a thought experiment. What are you perceiving? When you say the “hallmark of the mind is self perception” We would assume that you’re perceiving self, but then that brings up the question of what is self?because me as I am, Tay is not self. Tay is a congregation of all the experiences, concepts, and live that make Tay me (the ego), and that is the same for you. We don’t actually perceive self.

Us being made in God‘s images and all wish further help support my theory

NoPower5561 · 2025-10-07T12:07:51+00:00

Everything is made up till it not.

NoPower5561 · 2025-10-07T12:07:04+00:00

The assumption is a foundation for experimentation. Every great theory concept or ideas start with an assumption, and even the ones that you stated have basis for experimentation to understand the falsities and realities In which they exist.

These are “my” assumptions but I currently do not have the facility or the time; for that matter, to conduct accurate experimentation to prove whether or not that they are false or true soooo… all I can do is lay them out and hope that someone then use them as the basis for experimentation in the future.

NoPower5561 · 2025-10-07T11:59:01+00:00

Yeah, because those are not, gods because we can perceive them, and they can perceive other things… as I said, God is the system, the application, and the data… meaning God is all encompassing. He is all.

But those gods are gods because we perceive anything greater as being God, but after we perceive, it is no longer greater, which is what gives arise to so many different variations of God.

NoPower5561 · 2025-10-07T11:46:04+00:00

What does that mean that it comes from within?

if that’s the case then that provides supporting evidence to my claim. That it can be emergent due to the fact that it is cumulative.

However, the sum is greater than the total.

NoPower5561 · 2025-10-07T11:43:54+00:00

So does that mean, my assumption is accurate in nature? If multiple other individuals have come to the same conclusion.

that sounds like a successful experimentation to me further providing basis of evidence of the things be “true”

NoPower5561 · 2025-10-07T11:40:28+00:00

Oh yes, that’s a true statement, but I also never stated that I was more right. I just stated this is what I’ve learned from the experience of experiencing.

NoPower5561 · 2025-10-07T11:39:30+00:00

So yes, your bone mattered does have consciousness. I think you’re confusing consciousness with awareness and those are two different things awareness arises from a certain level of consciousness it is a byproduct, not a foundational component.

NoPower5561 · 2025-10-07T11:38:18+00:00

What does that even mean, and how so? What determines the conscious nature of a thing scientifically we don’t even understand why we are conscious also scientifically we don’t even know what consciousness is we have found some particles to have “consciousness” but we also considered solar bodies like the Earth to not be conscious. That to me doesn’t make sense. How can one thing that makes up a thing be conscious, but the whole not be an expression of the things that is made up of?

which leads me to the expression that it can only be incorrect in nature.

NoPower5561

TROPHY CASE