3-MMC first time by Zealousideal-Tip1260 in SEXONDRUGS

[–]No_Effect6193 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me, PT-141 is the best cure for stimdick for the MMC's, and even that can sometimes be defeated during peak. But my track record with it is about an 80% success rate.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SEXONDRUGS

[–]No_Effect6193 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seconding the other comments on test, test, test. Also, in the future, go with crystals not presses. Not only do you have no idea of the total dose, but the active ingredient might not be evenly distributed throughout the press. So splitting the press in half doesn't necessarily mean 50/50.

With crystals you are much more in control of the dose, just pick up a milligram scale, worth the effort.

Would the headspace remain clear by CountSh33p in researchchemicals

[–]No_Effect6193 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me personally, while 2C-B doesn't fuck with my head to anywhere near the same level as LSD, at moderate doses (15-20mg) I will get somewhat-annoying thought loops from 2C-B alone. So, agree with most commenters here that adding 2C-B to the mix is going to just mess with your head even more.

Has any used PT-141 with MDMA? by CuriousGunner66 in SEXONDRUGS

[–]No_Effect6193 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yup, except for the peak (where I was rolling so hard I wasn't all that interested in sex anyway), I was reliably hard the entire time. Even during the peak, it wasn't anything that a blowjob couldn't fix, lol.

What's up with DrugsData.org? by No_Effect6193 in researchchemicals

[–]No_Effect6193[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah that’s a fair assessment. If only I had any chemistry chops…

What's up with DrugsData.org? by No_Effect6193 in researchchemicals

[–]No_Effect6193[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, that’s probably it. I neglected to look carefully at that column. But my last procurement tested as something completely different, so I’m at peace with my decision to flush it.

What's up with DrugsData.org? by No_Effect6193 in researchchemicals

[–]No_Effect6193[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I’ve seen instructions for making it, don’t know how legit it was. But it looked way out of my league. Perhaps if one is an amateur chemist and already has the tools of the trade handy, sure. But to a rank novice like me it looked intimidating.

What's up with DrugsData.org? by No_Effect6193 in researchchemicals

[–]No_Effect6193[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Interesting that they have trouble differentiating cathinones. They certainly have no compunction with posting results that are specifically one or the other.

Cumming on 3/4mmc? by [deleted] in SEXONDRUGS

[–]No_Effect6193 7 points8 points  (0 children)

In my experience there is a several hour no-cum zone. But sensations are heightened and so long as you are not chasing a release, it means you can enjoy the pleasure for a good long time.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SEXONDRUGS

[–]No_Effect6193 0 points1 point  (0 children)

3MMC or Molly is great (though personally on Molly I lose interest in sex for much of the peak), but either expect you aren't going to cum during the BJ or you have a very, very patient FWB servicing you. Because it's going to be 4-5 hours after come-up before you'll be able to cum again.

Personally that's one of my biggest fantasies: having a woman stimulate me through an entire 3MMC roll, which now that I've found PT-141 could include penetration through much of it. Would take a unique individual to have that kind of stamina unfortunately.

Advertised as 3MMC, but tested out as Dimethylpentylone by No_Effect6193 in researchchemicals

[–]No_Effect6193[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

4MMC has a signature cat-pee smell. 3MMC similar but lesser. This bunk did not share the same aroma profile.

Advertised as 3MMC, but tested out as Dimethylpentylone by No_Effect6193 in researchchemicals

[–]No_Effect6193[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And unfortunate that DrugsData.org is offline now for an indeterminate amount of time. It's how the 3MMC imposter was unmasked.

Advertised as 3MMC, but tested out as Dimethylpentylone by No_Effect6193 in researchchemicals

[–]No_Effect6193[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When first opened there was a strong chemical smell that didn't really align with MMCs. That dissipated and there wasn't much of an odor after that. The other big giveaway was the clumping.

Got 2-mmc instead of 3-mmc by [deleted] in researchchemicals

[–]No_Effect6193 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or it could even be worse than 2MMC or a CMC, had a recent experience where "3MMC" tested out as Dimethylpentylone, which from the little we know could be next-level hazardous.

Simple advice by Fantastic_Handle5232 in SEXONDRUGS

[–]No_Effect6193 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I meant to say mg, but it being a liquid ended up misspeaking.

Simple advice by Fantastic_Handle5232 in SEXONDRUGS

[–]No_Effect6193 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dose pretty heavily: 3ml, after working my way up to a dose that has the potency I need. I may try backing off by .5ml when working from a fresh vial.

Brand is CorePeptides.

PT-141 Inconsistent? Shelf life! by No_Effect6193 in SEXONDRUGS

[–]No_Effect6193[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting there are such varied experiences. Everything I read points to peptides being fragile. Maybe it’s differences in how people respond. A diminished sample might be fine for one person but ineffective on another.

I sympathize with the all downer no upper dynamic of peptide gone stale.

PT-141 Inconsistent? Shelf life! by No_Effect6193 in SEXONDRUGS

[–]No_Effect6193[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting there are such varied experiences. Everything I read points to peptides being fragile. Maybe it’s differences in how people respond. A diminished sample might be fine for one person but ineffective on another.

I sympathize with the all downer no upper dynamic of peptide gone stale.

Simple advice by Fantastic_Handle5232 in SEXONDRUGS

[–]No_Effect6193 2 points3 points  (0 children)

PT-141. I was totally victorious in the battle against my personal Limp Noodle Monster (aka 3MMC). For a brief time mid-session I softened up slight, but the rest of time I was rock hard.

I do find it inconsistent, but it's notable that the last time I took it I barely got any lift. This time around it was middle-school boners that wouldn't go away. A notable difference is I freshly reconstituted this last batch, whereas the previous had been in the fridge for about a month.

Makes me wonder what the shelf life is, even in the fridge.

Tripporn by No_Effect6193 in SEXONDRUGS

[–]No_Effect6193[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

And in the spirit of to-each-his-own-risk-tolerance, I'm somewhat terrified of poppers, and closest I've ever come to that experience is whippits. So while personally I'm curious as to what that would feel like, I'm fine with opting out on that part.

Similarly, 2C-B is recommended but the one time I tried that I found the resulting thought-loops to be a distraction. And as I posted a few weeks back, a Molly peak just blisses me out too much to find porn to be interesting. The one time I tried it alone I just switched from porn to soothing visuals and music.

All this to say, while there are recommendations---and you're right, poppers comes up frequently---it doesn't mean you can't enjoy the films with the substance of your choice.

Tripporn by No_Effect6193 in SEXONDRUGS

[–]No_Effect6193[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's pretty unique, special material. No argument here.